A Few Words About London Fletcher....

[Gmanc711]

Originally Posted by los panda

he, along w deangelo hall and santana moss, will sign vet min deals as a show of faith.

Vet Min? No way. All three of those guys can find way more money than that somewhere else. Should they come back here for less money to be a part of this? Absolutley, and all three I think would....but if we offered any of them the vet minimum after what they've done (specifically Moss/Fletcher), I'd walk too.

That said, I thought all three played major roles this season and I'd like to see them all brought back, but Fletcher would be the most important. He was a freak the second half of the season.

[los panda]

Originally Posted by Gmanc711

Vet Min? No way. All three of those guys can find way more money than that somewhere else. Should they come back here for less money to be a part of this? Absolutley, and all three I think would....but if we offered any of them the vet minimum after what they've done (specifically Moss/Fletcher), I'd walk too.

That said, I thought all three played major roles this season and I'd like to see them all brought back, but Fletcher would be the most important. He was a freak the second half of the season.

it ill be the 3 of them, not even their agents, to make this offer to the redskins

[calia]

That may be, but I don't see their agents offering vet min because of concern that they'd be cut otherwise. They have to know that the Redskins need them and want them, and that desire will translate to more than the vet min.

Is anyone else finding themselves starting to obsess about next season already? After such a long time without tasting success, it's hard to let go of the 2012 season. It's like when you cross the desert and finally reach a cool pond of water never wanting to leave it. I was at the last home playoff game in 1999 (also a scrappy affair -- Brad Johnson actually body-slammed Robert Porcher -- it was phenomenal); it seems like a lifetime ago.

[Ruhskins]

Originally Posted by Gmanc711

Vet Min? No way. All three of those guys can find way more money than that somewhere else. Should they come back here for less money to be a part of this? Absolutley, and all three I think would....but if we offered any of them the vet minimum after what they've done (specifically Moss/Fletcher), I'd walk too.

That said, I thought all three played major roles this season and I'd like to see them all brought back, but Fletcher would be the most important. He was a freak the second half of the season.

Halll has said that he'd be willing to re-structure his contract, although it wasn't clear whether he'd take a pay cut or not.

[los panda]

Originally Posted by Ruhskins

Halll has said that he'd be willing to re-structure his contract, although it wasn't clear whether he'd take a pay cut or not.

"Like I said, whatever I’ve got to do to be here, I’m going to try to do that."

[Skinzman]

Originally Posted by Ruhskins

Halll has said that he'd be willing to re-structure his contract, although it wasn't clear whether he'd take a pay cut or not.

Hall has very little, if any, guaranteed money left on his contract due to his restructure in the uncapped year that initially brought on the cap penalty. Hall has no choice but to take a pay cut. He makes something like 8 mil this year and costs basically nothing to cut him. We cant keep him without a pay cut (we can but it makes no sense to) and if he doesnt take one, he gets cut. Either way, thats a pay cut for Hall, and he has no leverage in negotiations since the guaranteed money in his contract is gone.

[Ruhskins]

Originally Posted by Skinzman

Hall has very little, if any, guaranteed money left on his contract due to his restructure in the uncapped year that initially brought on the cap penalty. Hall has no choice but to take a pay cut. He makes something like 8 mil this year and costs basically nothing to cut him. We cant keep him without a pay cut (we can but it makes no sense to) and if he doesnt take one, he gets cut. Either way, thats a pay cut for Hall, and he has no leverage in negotiations since the guaranteed money in his contract is gone.

Sounds like he'll be taking a paycut, since he sounds pretty determined to stay. I still don't know if I want him at FS, b/c I'd rather have a young guy that's going to be there for years.