Patten on Ramsey

[MTK]

Originally Posted by backrow

I knew about the pounding, but did not realize he had led the league!

I just did a quick check of his stats from '03, after the first 4 games he had thrown for 1036 yards, 5 TDs and 2 INTs with a QB rating of 88.625.

[firstdown]

His average sack total per game was about th same in 2003 and 2004.

[Gmanc711]

Originally Posted by firstdown

His average sack total per game was about th same in 2003 and 2004.

Yeah. However, although there is no stat for it, you could tell that his sacks in 2003, were just plain guys having a feild day with him. Where he didnt take as many hard shots in 2004. Ya know what I mean?

[TheMalcolmConnection]

Yeah, and if they had stats for "knock downs" I bet they would be substantially higher in 2003.

[firstdown]

Originally Posted by Gmanc711

Yeah. However, although there is no stat for it, you could tell that his sacks in 2003, were just plain guys having a feild day with him. Where he didnt take as many hard shots in 2004. Ya know what I mean?

I totaly agree it was much worse in 2003. I was just surprised when I looked up the stat.

[skins052bgr8]

They were out coached under the old ball coach. Defenses had a field day with the Redskins offense in 03. Game planning to pick up other teams blitzes was not a speciality so to say it was completely PR's fault for holding the ball to long is not fully accurate. Any quarterback would have struggled behind that line and blocking schemes. It was ritual week after week that teams came with the house no surprise we were just out coached. There has to be a happy medium between max protection and straight defense in your face when you drop two steps. I think the coaches are realizing that as well this year and will make the adjustments. He has followed the coaches plans to the T with Spurrier he would toss it around last year Gibbs asked him to be conservative and he adapted. PR is very smart, tough and in the right position will get it done.

[offiss]

It's tough to say he held the ball to long his first few years because he never had time to hold the ball, he was guilty of trying to actually plant and throw, Brunell didn't hold the ball to long and we saw the result of what happens to a QB when we run simplistic pass patterns with WR's who can't get open, or catch the ball when they are.

Ramsey is guilty of nothing more than trying to make a play when there was nothing there, which was the case the majority of the time, teams knew exactly how to play us on defense, as Portis said it's what like they knew what we were running, as far as I am concerned Ramsey has been scapegoated by inferiour coaching his whole career, my only concern about Ramsey is will Gibbs catch up this season to utilize all of his talents?

[jermus22]

I like Ramsey's guts, courage, and leadership abilities, as well as his willingness to work hard to improve. All of those qualities are most important for any qb. Talent alone isn't enough (look at Jeff George). I also like Ramsey's rocket arm, and it's good he's shown improvement on his accuracy and ability to move around. But unless he fixes his touch on long passes, his ability to read defenses, and continues to improve his poise in the pocket, he won't remain with us beyond this year. I'm really rooting for the guy, but I also realize Campbell is waiting in the wings and has all the abilities necessary for a Gibbs type qb.

[offiss]

Jermus22, what abilities do you think he has that would make him a Gibbs type QB? Brains are the biggest attribute for a Gibbs QB, then a strong arm, considering Campbells first wonderlik test he scored a 9, and he doesn't have elite type arm strength, then consider Ramsey as far as intelligence goes is bordering on genious level, and has one of the strongest arms in the NFL, which vastly exceeds Campbells, if Ramsey can't get it done under Gibbs then what would make you think Campbell could? Also consider it took Campbell 4 year's of playing in college to figure out the college game, and IMO excelled his last year because of superiour talent surrounding him, why should anyone believe he can remotly get it done on the NFL level? Especially next season?

[SmootSmack]

Is it fair to say it took Campbell four years of playing college ball to understand the college game? I mean didn't he have four different offensive coordinators he had to learn from? It's not like he was ever given one solid system to learn under

[MTK]

According to this report Campbell's first wonderlic score was a 14, he took it again and got a 28.

http://www.usatoday.com/sports/footb...-QB-Auburn.htm

Positives... Has a very strong throwing arm and quick feet to avoid pressure, but is better suited throwing out of the pocket. ... Does a nice job of carrying out fakes and has a quick, high release with the strength to get the ball downfield. ... Is developing good toughness in the pocket and no longer looks for a rush lane or to hold on to the ball too long when his primary targets are covered. ... In 2004, Campbell had very good success with the deep outs, fades and posts. ... Shows better timing and the ability to give his receivers a chance to compete for the ball than he did in the past. ... Does a good job maneuvering when forced out of the pocket, but is better standing in the pocket than on the roll out, as he is more effective when he has a chance to time his throws. ... His natural athletic skills are what makes him an intriguing prospect, but understand that this is a player that has had to digest four different offensive systems during his four years in college. ... Made excellent progress in most areas of his game over the last year. ... Used to lock on to his main target too much, but coach Al Borges showed him that with patience, he does a much better job of scanning the field or taking hits stepping up in the pocket.

Negatives... Still, for a player of his size, he shows good mobility. ... When he rolls out of the pocket, he will sometimes hold the ball low and exposed, resulting in costly fumbles. ... Still needs to show better judgement, but has the power behind his throws to thread the ball in a crowd. ... His touch on his long ball has improved quite a bit, but he still needs to work on his underneath throws. ... Still has not fully grasped the mental aspect of calling his own game yet, and will need to have the plays called for him until he can prove that he can handle play-calling on his own. ... Does well in school (3.0 grade point average). His first Wonderlic test score (14) was lower than you like from a player at the quarterback position, but he then scored a much-improved 28 at the Combine in February. ... Needs to work on some fundamentals, especially his feet in his pass set, but he has the quickness to get back from center. ... Made more sound decisions in 2004 than he did in the past, but he still must improve in reading coverages.

[offiss]

Originally Posted by TAFKAS

Is it fair to say it took Campbell four years of playing college ball to understand <a href='http://67.15.154.58/cmapp/zx-hclick.php?hid=2' target='_blank'>the</a> college game? I mean didn't he have four different offensive coordinators he had to learn from? It's not like he was ever given one solid system to learn under

I don't believe it's fair to say that because no one seems to want to cut Ramsey that kind of slack, Ramsey has had a college coach for his first 2 years in the NFL with a minimal amount of playing time over that span, because he was in and out of the lineup from the beatings he was taking every week, Ramsey has something like 22 games under his belt, that's a season and a half, while having to deal with coaches trying to find their way, all the while doing it in the NFL, not an inferiour collegiate level.

I also want to know since Campbell had 4 different coordinators and had each one for the same amount of time, and each one had a different system to learn, then why is it he figured out the last system and not the others? Could it be the talent around him was just overwhelming?

If we are to say coaching makes the QB then why is everyone so quick to blame Ramsey and not SS, and Gibbs, and if we are to say the QB makes the coach, then why did we draft Campbell?

[MTK]

Originally Posted by offiss

I don't believe it's fair to say that because no one seems to want to cut Ramsey that kind of slack, Ramsey has had a college coach for his first 2 years in the NFL with a minimal amount of playing time over that span, because he was in and out of the lineup from the beatings he was taking every week, Ramsey has something like 22 games under his belt, that's a season and a half, while having to deal with coaches trying to find their way, all the while doing it in the NFL, not an inferiour collegiate level.

I also want to know since Campbell had 4 different coordinators and had each one for the same amount of time, and each one had a different system to learn, then why is it he figured out the last system and not the others? Could it be the talent around him was just overwhelming?

If we are to say coaching makes the QB then why is everyone so quick to blame Ramsey and not SS, and Gibbs, and if we are to say the QB makes the coach, then why did we draft Campbell?

Fair enough point about people not cutting Ramsey enough slack and I agree. He's been in different systems and has been in and out as the starter, I really don't think he's had an honest fair shot at being a NFL starter. Hopefully this year he'll get a full 16 starts and I think then he can be properly evaluated. It makes me chuckle when people say he's had a fair shot and has had enough starts to prove himself. He's started 23 games, a season and a half, and people think that's enough. :frusty:

As far as Campbell goes, I didn't see much of him in college so I don't know if he had a good senior season due to the talent around him, or perhaps it was due to his maturation as a player. Perhaps it's safe to say it was a combo of the two?

From most of the reports I've read on him, it sure sounds like he improved his game last year, from his accuracy to his decision making in the pocket.

[wolfeskins]

Originally Posted by offiss

I don't believe it's fair to say that because no one seems to want to cut Ramsey that kind of slack, Ramsey has had a college coach for his first 2 years in the NFL with a minimal amount of playing time over that span, because he was in and out of the lineup from the beatings he was taking every week, Ramsey has something like 22 games under his belt, that's a season and a half, while having to deal with coaches trying to find their way, all the while doing it in the NFL, not an inferiour collegiate level.

I also want to know since Campbell had 4 different coordinators and had each one for the same amount of time, and each one had a different system to learn, then why is it he figured out the last system and not the others? Could it be the talent around him was just overwhelming?

If we are to say coaching makes the QB then why is everyone so quick to blame Ramsey and not SS, and Gibbs, and if we are to say the QB makes the coach, then why did we draft Campbell?

paragraph 1- i totaly agree with you.

paragraph 2- i too would like to know the answer to that question. did campbell really struggle in the other systems or did he still play well but the team, overall, was worse ? did campbell play with, roughly, the same players in all those years ?

paragragh 3- i think the success of qb and the coach go hand in hand.

[Defensewins]

Originally Posted by offiss

Jermus22, what abilities do you think he has that would make him a Gibbs type QB? Brains are the biggest attribute for a Gibbs QB, then a strong arm, considering Campbells first wonderlik test he scored a 9, and he doesn't have elite type arm strength, then consider Ramsey as far as intelligence goes is bordering on genious level, and has one of the strongest arms in the NFL, which vastly exceeds Campbells, if Ramsey can't get it done under Gibbs then what would make you think Campbell could? Also consider it took Campbell 4 year's of playing in college to figure out the college game, and IMO excelled his last year because of superiour talent surrounding him, why should anyone believe he can remotly get it done on the NFL level? Especially next season?

What does the wonderlik test have to do with being a good QB in the NFL or for being a QB for Joe Gibbs?
NOTHING.
The test is a joke as a predictive tool for future NFL players.
Two rather undistinguished players from Harvard Pat McInally and Ryan Fitzpatrick (2005 7th round pick) are the only players to achieve a perfect 50.

But Donovan McNabb scored a 12 (on his second try), Dan Marino 14. Daunte Culpepper 15. Steve McNair 15, Michael Vick 20, Brett Farve 22. These scores are below average intelligence.
A statistical analysis by M. P. Mirable, "Intelligence and Football: Testing for Differentials in Collegiate Quarterback Passing Performance and NFL Compensation" found that the wonderlic test does not support the predictive power of quarterbacks. In other words this research discovered that a good score on the wonderlic test does not translate to anything, especally being a good QB in the NFL.
In fact more of the great QB's scored in the low range. Not a single hall of fame Qb or soon to be hall of fame QB score higher than 39 out of a possible 50.

Regarding Campbell, we will see what he has to offer. Nobody can predict what a rookie will do.
Who would have thought last year that Roethlisberger would outplay the #1 and #2 drafted players and 3rd year Patrick Ramsey?