![]() |
|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools
![]() |
Display Modes
![]() |
![]() |
#166 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 920
|
Re: Yet Another QB Rumors Thread (Volume 9)
Can't help but think the Browns have the edge if they want them. The Rams would only lose 2 spots and can still pick who they want, and they get two first round picks instead of later round picks. In my mind, Cleveland just has a better potential offer if they want him.
Also can't help but wonder - we were 5-11, and the browns were 4-12. It's fun to have trounced the SuperBowl winning NY Giants x 2 last year, but it did end up costing us several draft picks if we do this deal for RG3. |
![]() |
Advertisements |
![]() |
#167 | |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Yet Another QB Rumors Thread (Volume 9)
Quote:
I mean I guess that means the Vikings spot at #3, which seems insanely high to get RT. But if that's the case then maybe the Redskins feel they need to make this move. The danger of course is in getting fooled by a bluff. As for the Eskin rumors...he's an ass. But that's beside the point, that's not quite what I've heard (that's closer to what I'd heard to get Luck at 1) but it's certainly feasible. Been out all day, but from what I've heard some more reports of Orakpo being part of a potential deal are starting to come out. Heard we spent a lot of time with Kirk Cousins today as well. Anyone know if he ran today? If so, what was his 40?
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#168 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,712
|
Re: Yet Another QB Rumors Thread (Volume 9)
Smoot, based on what you know now, what scenarios do you think are most likely for us as far as getting a qb?
__________________
Dolphins get good press for saving drowning humans.But we only hear about the swimmers theyve pushed ashore.You know who we havent heard from: all the people theyve pushed out to sea.Dolphins dont know what theyre doing-they just like pushing things. |
![]() |
![]() |
#169 | |
Gamebreaker
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 14,523
|
Re: Yet Another QB Rumors Thread (Volume 9)
Quote:
4.93 in the 40. NFL Events: Combine Tracker
__________________
"So let me get this straight. We have the event of the year on TV with millions watching around the world... and people want a punt, pass, and kick competition to be the halftime entertainment?? Folks, don't quit your day jobs."- Matty |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#170 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 363
|
Re: Yet Another QB Rumors Thread (Volume 9)
God, I hope we stay away from Cousins!!!
Luck RGIII Osweiler Foles Tannehill Wilson Cousins Weeden |
![]() |
![]() |
#171 | |
Warpath Hall of Fame
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 34,782
|
Re: Yet Another QB Rumors Thread (Volume 9)
Quote:
I wouldnt think it would be Miami, Seattle makes a ton of sense to want to do that.
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler He Gets Us |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#172 |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
|
Re: Yet Another QB Rumors Thread (Volume 9)
Smoke screen. Gotta love them. Force the Browns to give up both their #1's and more just to get him then we can trade up from round 2 to the second (late 1st) round pick and get a WR to go along with Weeden.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#173 | |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Yet Another QB Rumors Thread (Volume 9)
Quote:
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#174 |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Yet Another QB Rumors Thread (Volume 9)
Nothing new really. Had been hearing Dolphins for quite a while. Seems like others are talking about it now as well. But, like I said last night, the Redskins interest in moving up for him (and not Luck) is a minor surprise for me. So I may have been wrong about that. Have to see how it plays out.
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
![]() |
![]() |
#175 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Charleston , SC
Posts: 5,001
|
Re: Yet Another QB Rumors Thread (Volume 9)
That may be true, but does it equal Dangerous Bruce and Mike because that is who is calling the shots not the owner.
__________________
Just win. |
![]() |
![]() |
#176 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,526
|
Re: Yet Another QB Rumors Thread (Volume 9)
We need to start a Dan Marino rumor about RG3 so that teams pass him up.
If no one knows what the dan marino rumor is, it was that he had done cocaine in college.
__________________
"Anyones better than Madieu Williams" |
![]() |
![]() |
#177 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Washington, D.C.
Posts: 4,114
|
Re: Yet Another QB Rumors Thread (Volume 9)
If the Redskins don't get RG3 in the draft, then there's always Grossman and Beck. Perhaps Jonathan Crompton will surprise everyone in training camp and be the starter on opening day.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#178 |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Kutztown, PA
Posts: 41
|
Re: Yet Another QB Rumors Thread (Volume 9)
Leave
|
![]() |
![]() |
#179 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Yet Another QB Rumors Thread (Volume 9)
Quote:
Describing it as the Redskins vs. time simply points out the reality that the pick wouldn't get moved before draft day if the Redskins were to abstain from being part of the discussions. If you take out the biggest player for the pick, then there simply isn't much trade interest.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#180 |
Fire Bruce NOW
![]() Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 11,434
|
Re: Yet Another QB Rumors Thread (Volume 9)
Unacceptable! Now go to the corner and think about what you wrote.
__________________
Bruce Allen when in charge alone: 4-12 (.250) Bruce Allen's overall Redskins record : 28-52 (.350) Vinny Cerrato's record when in charge alone: 52-65 (.444) Vinny's overall Redskins record: 62-82 (.430) We won more with Vinny |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|