I See QB Rumors (2012 QB Thread: The Sixth Sense)

[EARTHQUAKE2689]

Originally Posted by Dirtbag59

Depends on what the other picks are, but generally speaking it wouldn't be the worst thing we could do.

Not the worst thing but it's definitely not what I want to see happen:

1st choice: Andrew Luck
2nd choice: Robert Griffin III
3rd choice: Morris Claiborne
4th choice: Justin Blackmon
5th choice: Trent Richardson
6th choice: Trade down
7th choice: Dre Kirkpatrick
8th choice: 1st round offensive lineman

[redskins forever]

why do you just get a matt flynn, or someone close to that, keep grossman as a backup, and hold on to next year and then try to get matt barkley and just spend this years draft getting playmakers and more depth

[Gmanc711]

Originally Posted by redskins forever

why do you just get a matt flynn, or someone close to that, keep grossman as a backup, and hold on to next year and then try to get matt barkley and just spend this years draft getting playmakers and more depth

Cause whether he's worth it or not, Flynn is probably going to be looking for starter money.. and you don't make that investment just to draft someone in a year.

[EARTHQUAKE2689]

Originally Posted by redskins forever

why do you just get a matt flynn, or someone close to that, keep grossman as a backup, and hold on to next year and then try to get matt barkley and just spend this years draft getting playmakers and more depth

Because we would be paying Matt Flynn $50 million to be a stopgap, Grossman would still be on the roster, we would need the worst record to get Matt Barkley and that won't happen and we did that last year, time to get our QB. No more next years class is better BS.

[KI Skins Fan]

Originally Posted by EARTHQUAKE2689

Am I the only one would be upset with a 1st round top 10 pick OT?

I wouldn't like it either. There seems to be a number of good OT prospects in this draft such as Barrett Jones, Zebrie Sanders, and Levy Adcock, who we can get later.

I'd have no problem with trading down if we couldn't get any of your Top 5.

[NC_Skins]

Originally Posted by EARTHQUAKE2689

Am I the only one would be upset with a 1st round top 10 pick OT?

Considering your LT is one bong hit away from a years suspension and your RT is most likely not going to be on the squad, no I wouldn't be upset with it.

[IrMitchell]

I'd be upset if it was Riley Reiff. He got killed in his final two games.

I'm honestly tempted to draft Coples/Upshaw and have the best rushing core in the league.

[EARTHQUAKE2689]

Originally Posted by NC_Skins

Considering your LT is one bong hit away from a years suspension and your RT is most likely not going to be on the squad, no I wouldn't be upset with it.

Suspension is the ugly way of looking at it. Think of it as a yearlong mandatory vacation from work.

[EARTHQUAKE2689]

Originally Posted by IrMitchell

I'd be upset if it was Riley Reiff. He got killed in his final two games.

I'm honestly tempted to draft Coples/Upshaw and have the best rushing core in the league.

Put Michael Brockers in that group too.

[skinsguy]

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

Tough to say, but probably Claiborne since they expect to make some moves for WR during free agency.

If we stay at 6, and he's not taken yet, I think Claiborne is probably at the top of our list. Or they may go with someone like Riley Reiff

I know a lot of people think they'd just take Tannehill at #6, but I've never thought that. And, for various reasons, I'm starting to have some doubts on just how much they really like him.

Yeah at this point, I think drafting Ryan Tannehill at #6 would be ridiculous.

[IrMitchell]

Originally Posted by EARTHQUAKE2689

Put Michael Brockers in that group too.

Still undecided on him, love his character, love his potential.. But he's benefiting from having played on an OUTSTANDING defense, and he didn't have top 6 production.

He's not going to come into camp day 1 and win a spot like we've seen with our last few 1st rounders.

[BuckSkin]

Am I the only one that thinks RG3 could be there at 6?
1. Colts/ Luck...
2. Rams/ Kalil
3. Vikings/ Claiborne
4. Browns/ Blackmon
5. Bucs/ Richardson

[EARTHQUAKE2689]

Originally Posted by BuckSkin

Am I the only one that thinks RG3 could be there at 6?
1. Colts/ Luck...
2. Rams/ Kalil
3. Vikings/ Claiborne
4. Browns/ Blackmon
5. Bucs/ Richardson

I think he WILL be there at 6 but everyone thinks everybody will be gone when we pick.

[SmootSmack]

Originally Posted by BuckSkin

Am I the only one that thinks RG3 could be there at 6?
1. Colts/ Luck...
2. Rams/ Kalil
3. Vikings/ Claiborne
4. Browns/ Blackmon
5. Bucs/ Richardson

Would not surprise me in the least. And if he was, I'd be awfully tempted to say "Ok Miami we know you like RG3. Let's talk"

But I would only do that if we've secured at least one QB in free agency or via trade prior to the draft

[IrMitchell]

Originally Posted by BuckSkin

Am I the only one that thinks RG3 could be there at 6?
1. Colts/ Luck...
2. Rams/ Kalil
3. Vikings/ Claiborne
4. Browns/ Blackmon
5. Bucs/ Richardson

1. Luck
2. Kalil / Blackmon
3. Kalil / Claiborne
4. RG3
5. Where the draft begins.

RG3 won't be there at 6, no chance whatsoever.