Preliminary '06 ratings

MTK · 05-22-2005, 10:10 PM

Skins D got totally robbed

Code:

 Team     Overall	 Offense	  Defense
Patriots	97		92		96
Eagles		96		96		94
Steelers	91		89		92
Vikings		90		86		92
Colts		90		99		68
Chargers	88		90		79
Seahawks	86		89		84
Ravens		86		85		90	
Panthers	86		87		92
Chiefs		85		91		77
Bengals		85		85		76
Falcons		85		80		87
Jaguars		84		83		86
Texans		83		84		83
Rams		82		90		69
Jets		81		86		76
Raiders		81		88		65
Packers		80		92		63
Cardinals	78		78		79
Bills		78		70		95
Lions		78		87		74
 Redskins	77		82		74
Buccaneers	75		76		83
Broncos		74		73		80
Bears		73		70		76
Cowboys		73		72		79
Saints		72		83		66
Giants		72		68		75
Dolphins	70		68		79
Titans		69		76		66
49ers		67		70		68
Browns		61		62		60

wolfeskins · 05-22-2005, 10:16 PM

just look at the skins d and the vikes d.... thats a bunch of bullsh*t.

wolfeskins · 05-22-2005, 10:19 PM

the skins offense got a higher number then thier defense.

MTK · 05-22-2005, 10:19 PM

The D-line must kill the overall D rating, what else could it be??

Gmanc711 · 05-22-2005, 10:25 PM

WOW! Thats downright horrible. How our offense got a better rating than our D is beyond me. The D line isnt super, but they shouldnt bring down the rating that much; especially with Griffin keepin a higher number. Who knows

Sheriff Gonna Getcha · 05-22-2005, 11:56 PM

The Chiefs have a better D rating! That's ridiculous

That Guy · 05-23-2005, 01:09 AM

the bills have a 95 and we have a 74? WTF...

MTK · 05-23-2005, 08:53 AM

I'm not sure how they get these overall ratings, but at least we know the Skins D will be stacked with guys like Arrington, Washington, Taylor, Griffin, Springs, etc. Rogers should be rated pretty well as a rookie, so at least there will be plenty of playmakers on this defense.

TheMalcolmConnection · 05-23-2005, 08:56 AM

Just like I said in another post, these guys basically go with what they see on paper (even though them giving us such a horrible ranking for D is baffling). It's like they plug it into a computer. I mean how else would they get numbers for these type of things?

Redskins_P · 05-23-2005, 10:04 AM

Thats some bullshit.

joecrisp · 05-23-2005, 05:13 PM

The Madden guys are obviously putting a lot of stock into the free agency additions/losses.

I guess from an outsider's standpoint, the losses of Smoot and Pierce would presumably have a devastating effect on the Skins' defense (or at least their Madden equivalent), especially when the D-line wasn't upgraded at all.

On the other hand, the Vikings and Chiefs made several splashy free agency additions to their defenses, so you would expect their ratings to go up...

Personally, I've been modifying the league rosters on Madden 2005 ever since free agency started, creating draftees, and altering the players' attributes to more accurately reflect (at least in my mind) the players' real-life abilities. I think my version of the Skins' defense will be rated a little bit higher than 74.

I always like to do that in the offseason to see how my projected team and player ratings compare to the ratings in the new game when it comes out. Yeah, I know, it's totally geeky-- but I get pretty damned bored in the offseason.

skinsfanthru&thru · 05-23-2005, 11:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joecrisp

Personally, I've been modifying the league rosters on Madden 2005 ever since free agency started, creating draftees, and altering the players' attributes to more accurately reflect (at least in my mind) the players' real-life abilities. I think my version of the Skins' defense will be rated a little bit higher than 74.

I always like to do that in the offseason to see how my projected team and player ratings compare to the ratings in the new game when it comes out. Yeah, I know, it's totally geeky-- but I get pretty damned bored in the offseason.

I 2 do this cuz even though we are a bit biased, there's no way some of our players (especially on the defense) should have such low stats and rankings. Plus there should be some way for them to put into atleast the first season the fact that the club (minus a couple free agent losses) is bringing back last years #3 defense without one of its bigtime players playing much last year.

and there's no way the offense should be at 82 or whatever it is. It should be no higher than 76.

FRPLG · 05-29-2005, 12:07 PM

That is some crazy shit. How is it that we're now the new Cowboys and everyone loves to hate on us?

wolfeskins · 05-29-2005, 01:25 PM

almost every media person who speaks of the skins offense says that the skins have not really improved their offense with the offseason additions, with the exception of casey rabach and the return of jansen. yet the offense get rated higher than the #1 defense in the nfc last year. a defense that lost only a #2 cb and a mlb that has been the starter for only 1 year.

BossHog · 05-30-2005, 05:27 PM

I'm sure our defense will play better than it's rating.

05-22-2005, 10:19 PM	#4
MTK \m/ Join Date: Feb 2004 Age: 52 Posts: 99,741	Re: Preliminary '06 ratings The D-line must kill the overall D rating, what else could it be??

05-22-2005, 10:25 PM	#5
Gmanc711 Thank You, Sean. Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Gaithersburg, MD Age: 39 Posts: 7,506	Re: Preliminary '06 ratings WOW! Thats downright horrible. How our offense got a better rating than our D is beyond me. The D line isnt super, but they shouldnt bring down the rating that much; especially with Griffin keepin a higher number. Who knows __________________ #21

05-22-2005, 11:56 PM	#6
Sheriff Gonna Getcha Franchise Player Join Date: Feb 2004 Age: 45 Posts: 8,317	Re: Preliminary '06 ratings The Chiefs have a better D rating! That's ridiculous

05-23-2005, 01:09 AM	#7
That Guy Living Legend Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: VA Age: 42 Posts: 17,574	Re: Preliminary '06 ratings the bills have a 95 and we have a 74? WTF...

05-23-2005, 08:53 AM	#8
MTK \m/ Join Date: Feb 2004 Age: 52 Posts: 99,741	Re: Preliminary '06 ratings I'm not sure how they get these overall ratings, but at least we know the Skins D will be stacked with guys like Arrington, Washington, Taylor, Griffin, Springs, etc. Rogers should be rated pretty well as a rookie, so at least there will be plenty of playmakers on this defense. __________________ Support The Warpath! \| Warpath Shop

05-22-2005, 10:16 PM	#2
wolfeskins The Starter Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: chesapeake,va. Posts: 2,160	Re: Preliminary '06 ratings just look at the skins d and the vikes d.... thats a bunch of bullsh*t.

05-22-2005, 10:19 PM	#3
wolfeskins The Starter Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: chesapeake,va. Posts: 2,160	Re: Preliminary '06 ratings the skins offense got a higher number then thier defense.

05-23-2005, 08:56 AM	#9
TheMalcolmConnection I like big (_\|_)s. Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Charlottesville, Virginia Age: 43 Posts: 19,254	Re: Preliminary '06 ratings Just like I said in another post, these guys basically go with what they see on paper (even though them giving us such a horrible ranking for D is baffling). It's like they plug it into a computer. I mean how else would they get numbers for these type of things? __________________ Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted.

05-23-2005, 10:04 AM	#10
Redskins_P Fight for old DC! Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Aldie, VA Age: 46 Posts: 4,101	Re: Preliminary '06 ratings Thats some bullshit.

05-23-2005, 05:13 PM	#11
joecrisp The Starter Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Charlottesville, VA Age: 49 Posts: 1,501	Re: Preliminary '06 ratings The Madden guys are obviously putting a lot of stock into the free agency additions/losses. I guess from an outsider's standpoint, the losses of Smoot and Pierce would presumably have a devastating effect on the Skins' defense (or at least their Madden equivalent), especially when the D-line wasn't upgraded at all. On the other hand, the Vikings and Chiefs made several splashy free agency additions to their defenses, so you would expect their ratings to go up... Personally, I've been modifying the league rosters on Madden 2005 ever since free agency started, creating draftees, and altering the players' attributes to more accurately reflect (at least in my mind) the players' real-life abilities. I think my version of the Skins' defense will be rated a little bit higher than 74. I always like to do that in the offseason to see how my projected team and player ratings compare to the ratings in the new game when it comes out. Yeah, I know, it's totally geeky-- but I get pretty damned bored in the offseason.

05-29-2005, 12:07 PM	#13
FRPLG MVP Join Date: May 2004 Age: 46 Posts: 10,164	Re: Preliminary '06 ratings That is some crazy shit. How is it that we're now the new Cowboys and everyone loves to hate on us?

05-29-2005, 01:25 PM	#14
wolfeskins The Starter Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: chesapeake,va. Posts: 2,160	Re: Preliminary '06 ratings almost every media person who speaks of the skins offense says that the skins have not really improved their offense with the offseason additions, with the exception of casey rabach and the return of jansen. yet the offense get rated higher than the #1 defense in the nfc last year. a defense that lost only a #2 cb and a mlb that has been the starter for only 1 year.

05-30-2005, 05:27 PM	#15
BossHog Registered User Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Norfolk, Va Posts: 665	Re: Preliminary '06 ratings I'm sure our defense will play better than it's rating.

Preliminary '06 ratings

Parking Lot