The never ending Jason Campbell player haters ball

[aceinthehouse]

Originally Posted by SirClintonPortis

Threads can become sweet, sour, stupid in a good way, or stupid in a bad way. You're the master of making them stupid in a bad way.

And you barge into my [merged] thread with a brain-dead analysis in which you displayed an inability to distinguish between the concepts of accountability, which Campbell is lacking in, and class, in which he has some.

Actually,I believe I made excellent point's that you obviously disagree with portis...and that's your opinion and fine.

And what you call brain-dead analysis,many others would call facts.

The fact alone that "he's a nice guy" isn't even a fact.
He may appear that way to you,but it doesn't make true.

I pointed out that the guy takes no responsibility for the mistakes that he's at least a Big part of...yet he never acknowledges it. Ever!

Then he's surprised to be taken out,when his performances was absolutely terrible.

Tom Cable gets it...Mike Shanahan gets it....
The only people that don't get it,are the Campbell supporters till the very end and perhaps Al Davis who reminds him of Jim Plunkett.

Now Al I can give a break too,cause the guy is older than the crypt keeper
But there just is no excuse for the stupidity for those who actually still believe...

It's the raiders O-line
Running game
Defense

or whatever lame excuses they have came up with this week.
Same excuses and same results

[over the mountain]

is OMFG one of those acronyms kids use nowadays?

whoever made that thread in the parking lot about guessin what some acronyms they posted means, that was pretty cool.

[SirClintonPortis]

Originally Posted by aceinthehouse

Actually,I believe I made excellent point's that you obviously disagree with portis...and that's your opinion and fine.

And what you call brain-dead analysis,many others would call facts.

The fact alone that "he's a nice guy" isn't even a fact.
He may appear that way to you,but it doesn't make true.

I pointed out that the guy takes no responsibility for the mistakes that he's at least a Big part of...yet he never acknowledges it. Ever!

Then he's surprised to be taken out,when his performances was absolutely terrible.

Tom Cable gets it...Mike Shanahan gets it....
The only people that don't get it,are the Campbell supporters till the very end and perhaps Al Davis who reminds him of Jim Plunkett.

Now Al I can give a break too,cause the guy is older than the crypt keeper
But there just is no excuse for the stupidity for those who actually still believe...

It's the raiders O-line
Running game
Defense

or whatever lame excuses they have came up with this week.
Same excuses and same results

You're dumb enough to not realize that I did not say "Campbell does take responsibility for his actions". You, just like that other member in the other thread, can't read a complete sentence when angry.

You can't even notice when I'm agreeing with you for something.

You should have been able to garner from my post that I conveyed the idea that Campbell is not holding himself accountable enough.

Also, you didn't use responsibility or accountability when first discussing Campbell, you used "class". If you cannot realize the dissimilarities between these two words in your native language, you're hopeless.

Oh, and before you charge blindly again, I'll point out exactly where I meant what I meant about Campbell's lack of personal accountability.

And you barge into my [merged] thread with a brain-dead analysis in which you displayed an inability to distinguish between the concepts of accountability, which Campbell is lacking in, and class, in which he has some.

[aceinthehouse]

yea..the back and forth is tiresome...

I'm just happy about the redskins situation and will continue to be...

And i think we can all agree that Jason Campbell has a lot of work to do,if he's going to take back the #1 job. He's running out of opportunities.

That's all I have to say in this thread.

[GTripp0012]

Originally Posted by MonkFan4Life

Hey GTripp remember when you said this ? Looks like I wasn't that far off on his skills or lack thereof. Go back and watch some more tape guy. However, I don't expect you to be able to analyze what he can or cannot do because deep down you must be right. I don't know if you actually feel right but,.... I really was. 2 NFL Head Coaches have agreed with me so far, then again I'm probably wrong.

I don't know, you seem as clueless now as you ever did. Thanks for pointing out that I did say that. I still stand by it of course.

Then again, you seem like a good enough guy, so if you ever get the urge for yet another strawman -- you know where to find me.

[KLHJ2]

Love the title! It's about time we call it what it is.

[GTripp0012]

Originally Posted by artmonkforhallofamein07

I was listening to the radio up in DC back in May ( it was the ESPN radio staion on FM ), and the talk show hosts asked a poll question as to whether the JC lead Raiders would have a better record then the Mcnabb lead Skins, and I would say at least 70-75% of the callers said the Raiders. All Skins fans, I was pretty shocked at how stupid people sounded and even astounded that some many callers really believed it. They absolutley were convincted of thier opinion.

I'd put my money on the Redskins because the Raiders generally don't have a clue, but:

We're 1-1.
They're 1-1.
They have the easier remaining schedule, by far.

[GTripp0012]

Also, this new thread title completely ends the need for this thread to be closed. May it live on indefinately!

[EARTHQUAKE2689]

Originally Posted by GTripp0012

Also, this new thread title completely ends the need for this thread to be closed. May it live on indefinately!

Yeah because we remember the last never ending thread here.

[GTripp0012]

Originally Posted by EARTHQUAKE2689

Yeah because we remember the last never ending thread here.

The OP of that one had better intentions, I would say.

[GTripp0012]

Originally Posted by freddyg12

That's a really good point. I'm one of those that was attached to him because Gibbs drafted him, he was the qb of the future & he is a likable media figure, though not dynamic in the least. I'd also watched him beat my Hokies in the sugar bowl in 04-5 & thought he was pretty composed as a leader.

Now as you said, he's got to start over, but the catch is that they expected him to be a starter from day 1 & play like their qb of the future. Well, either the future has been delayed or Gradkowski is their future.

Yeah, what's clear about Oakland now is that they didn't really go into the season with a strong philosophy on how they would throw the football, they went in just kind of figuring that subtracting Russell and adding Campbell and Hue Jackson would just fix whatever was wrong. And rather than start building that philosophy now a little late, they're just going to plug Gradkowski in for Campbell and hope that fixes things.

A spoiler: it won't.

They should still be good for 6 or 7 wins no matter who is at quarterback, and if anything, their offense is going to be better than I predicted because their philosophy of just adding talent and hoping for the best actually worked in the case of Darren McFadden. But even with a two-headed monster RB duo and a running game, they still won't break .500 because they can't protect the passer.

[artmonkforhallofamein07]

Originally Posted by GTripp0012

Also, this new thread title completely ends the need for this thread to be closed. May it live on indefinately!

PREACH!!

I still do not believe the Raiders will have as good a record as us. We are going to turn this thing up! Ha...... Screw the Raiders...

[53Fan]

I've been gone awhile...... have I missed anything?

[Lotus]

Originally Posted by GTripp0012

Also, this new thread title completely ends the need for this thread to be closed. May it live on indefinately!

Noooooooooooooo!

[EARTHQUAKE2689]

Originally Posted by GTripp0012

The OP of that one had better intentions, I would say.

Definitely agree with that.