Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Redskins and Titans talking trade again on Albert Haynesworth

Locker Room Main Forum


 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 09-07-2010, 12:56 PM   #11
Longtimefan
Playmaker
 
Longtimefan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Germantown, Md.
Posts: 4,832
re: Redskins and Titans talking trade again on Albert Haynesworth

Quote:
Originally Posted by aceinthehouse View Post
I hate to say it...but they should have traded haynesworth when he was involved with the Mcnabb trade.

It would have cost us much less than the 2nd and (3rd or 4th) by him being involved in that trade.

But this was before we paid him his monster up front bonus and the eagles didn't want to be on the hook for all that money...which is exactly what's going to happen anyways now.

We pay haynesworth and ship him,when we could have done the same thing with Philly and traded him for mcnabb and less in draft picks...(probably could have kept our 2nd rounder that they got nate Allen with)

But then we would be facing him twice every season,so I don't fault the FO for not doing it either...
But if the guy is worthless, why should we worry about having to face him twice a year playing with a rival? Remember, we want him, but we don' want him. Can't be both ways, has to be one or the other.
__________________
A revolution is coming and it will be televised.
Longtimefan is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 3.70984 seconds with 11 queries