![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Norfolk, Va
Posts: 665
|
Re: mike barrow
The odds are against him right now. No one can take away from all of his acomplishments and career stats. Old age has finally caught up with him and it'll be a long road to coming back from this type of injury. As Bubba Tyer put it 'This injury is career threatening'. He'll be given a chance, before June 1st cuts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Playmaker
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,159
|
Re: mike barrow
MIke Barrow was last year's version of Dave Fiore. Barrow and Fiore had long and solid and productive careers in the NFL and were willing to come play here for not a backbreaking amount of money. The reason they would take less than huge money is that both Barrow and Fiore had mileage [translation: wear and tear] on them. And unfortunately, both of them got hurt here and never gave the Redskins anything that even resembled what they had accomplished prior to coming to Washington.
This is NOT something to beat up the FO about. They made good signings with both of these guys but the "football gods" did not smile on the Skins in those situations. Neither guy is the reason the Skins are having "cap difficultes". The FO took a shot at two productive players who had some injury history; in both cases, they crapped out. Hi Ho!
__________________
The Sports Curmudgeon www.sportscurmudgeon.com But don't get me wrong, I love sports... |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,620
|
Re: mike barrow
Quote:
![]() sh*t happens... but i don't have any problems or regrets with those signings unlike the massive deals to over the hill guys like bruce smith and mark brunell :P |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 8,317
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|