McNabb a REDSKIN!

[Longtimefan]

Originally Posted by SBXVII

Holey Crap! I don't look at it today and Bam. I'm not happy. I'm not a fan of McNoodle.

Any chance this is the beginning of a trade with the Rams? Especially since they were interested in McNabb anyway?

We're getting older by the minute, Methuselah will be coming in next week.

[Darrell_Green_28]

Or could we be about to make a deal , move back some and draft a lineman in the first and maybe a young qb later on for mcnabb to teach?

[D'BOYZ]

Hey Guys just saw this on NFL Network GREAT News for u Guys I can't belive one guyu here can complain about getting McNabb who at least has 4 more good years left of him for a 2nd round pick that was a great move and like some say now you focus on OT and you automaticly have a pretty good offense.

Now you guys have to mark two games next season Philly at Was and Was at philly both games are going to be really intense.

[mredskins]

I am not a fan of this move but I guess it is a wait and see type deal. I feel like we are back to the mentality that we are one player away from being a SB contender which is so untrue. I am disappointed.

[CRedskinsRule]

Snyder finally got out of his duct tape.
:vomit:

[Ruhskins]

Originally Posted by GMScud

I must say this is very reminiscent of a Snyder move. Giving up a high draft pick for a big name vet past his prime.

McNabb notoriously underthrows receivers and can't create with his feet anymore. In fact I'd argue that JC is more mobile that DM right now. Unless that line gets a ton better, we've come nowhere with this. I wonder what all the lovers would be saying if it was Cerrato who made this same move?

I'm still undecided, but I'm leaning towards not really liking this, especially since we'll probably give him a lucrative extension as well. With this move, I now forsee at least a few current players traded before the draft.

Well a Snyder/Cerrato would have been us giving up our first rounder.

[tryfuhl]

Originally Posted by GTripp0012

In 2009 DVOA, Romo was 7th, Eli was 11th, Kolb (who barely qualified) was 16th, and McNabb was 20th. Campbell was 25th.

We could argue all day whether McNabb or Kolb is the better 2010 QB, but the team that had them both thinks Kolb is. We think McNabb is.

We may think that Kolb is as well, but if they're enamored then it probably isn't worth us giving it up. Plus we probably want a veteran to lead us into the next "era"

People put value on potential play.. we've seen it before.. kind of like Favre/Rodgers just because of different reasons

[SBXVII]

Originally Posted by Darrell_Green_28

hmmm wonder if we are cosidering trading him to the Rams and work a deal for the #1 pick? could this be a possiblility

This is what I actually think is going to happen. Everyone is getting their panties in a bunch about now having him but the Rams were interested also. They just couldn't get the job done. We send McNabb and our 4th round pick and I bet we get the #1 overall.

Trade JC for a #2 and were right back in it with an OL.

I don't know maybe it's just me.

[cdskins26]

Originally Posted by Darrell_Green_28

hmmm wonder if we are cosidering trading him to the Rams and work a deal for the #1 pick? could this be a possiblility

I would love it, but at this point that would almost never happen. If we wanted to swing a trade with the Rams and take Bradford, we definitely have the resources to have done that otherwise. I see now why we have brought in all of those veteran RB's.

[Ruhskins]

Originally Posted by 44Deezel

This has backfire written all over it. Stupid move.

Well, weren't you one of the people that hated JC no matter what?

[takethecake]

Originally Posted by Ruhskins

Well a Snyder/Cerrato would have been us giving up our first rounder.

hahaha that made me laugh

[GTripp0012]

Originally Posted by 12thMan

And for all the pundits out there fawning over Kolb, he's thrown a grand total of 130 passes.

The relevant question though is how many passes MORE will he throw compared to McNabb.

If McNabb lasts longer here than Kolb does in Philly, we probably end up winning this trade. In all other scenarios, we probably lose it.

The gamble is that we can get better production from the 33.5 year old than they can get from their 26.5 year old. It's a gamble that we'll lose most of the time. But you only have to win it once, I suppose.

[SBXVII]

Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule

Snyder finally got out of his duct tape.
:vomit:

LOL this is some funny stuff.

[CRedskinsRule]

Originally Posted by skinsfaninok

So JC is headed to Buffalo? That's still being mentioned on ESPNRADIO

Why would ANY team give us anything major for Campbell now. Maybe before we could say oh, we will just keep him. Now, if we don't trade him... wow,

:vomit:

[12thMan]

I don't get the logic of some not wanting to bring McNabb here, but wanting us to draft a rookie that wouldn't have an impact doesn't make sense to me.

The fact remains, there will be quarterbacks available in the draft from now until eternity.