Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Mega-Merge: 2010 Free Agency Rumors and Reports Thread

Locker Room Main Forum


Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-09-2010, 10:16 AM   #1201
freddyg12
Playmaker
 
freddyg12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,540
Re: Mega-Merge: 2010 Free Agency Rumors and Reports Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by SBXVII View Post
I was just wondering, what if the trade is not with the Browns. What if there is a trade in the works, word is leaked or slips out but we speculate it's the Browns and it's not. The front office can deny that a trade is in the works with the Browns but yet not be lying.

It's just a fabrication but what if we have a gentlemans agreement with the Rams for them to pick up Bradford and we pick up a player they would be interested in at our pick. We get stuck with the high cost of a #1 pick, trade Campbell to them for Bradford, and give them the pick they wanted at #4 at a lower cost? I know it sounds far fetched but the Rams have been looking into moving out of the pick, and it was rumored they were interested in Campbell. The only positive spot to get Bradford is at #1 otherwise we don't know what the teams prior to us or our trading team are going to want to do. Plus this gives the Rams two players or basically two picks for the #1 spot. They would get Campbell and whoever they wanted us to draft at #4.

It was also rumored that this might be their HC's last year. Supposedly their front office/ownership was not happy with how their season ended and rumor has it he has next year to turn it around. Why would the HC want to chance his job on a Rookie QB when he could get a proven commodity at a reasonable price in Campbell and a draft pick to fill another hole?

I'm not saying I agree with this or if the trade value is even comparable. I was just wondering if any of you other fans thought of this and or perhaps if those with the resources might want to explore this in regards to trade rumors. We would get the player Shanahan covets, the Rams get a decent QB and a player of another spot they need.
This makes a lot of sense, would really make sense if Al Saunders were still in St. Louis. Given the skins rebuilding of sorts, getting the rookie qb would seem to make sense if they really like Bradford. I just wonder if the Rams really don't think Bulger has it for another couple years. If Bulger is healthy JC isn't an upgrade over him.

this deal would also likely entail a new contract for JC. Would the Rams be willing to pay him? how much?
freddyg12 is offline  

Advertisements
Old 03-09-2010, 10:22 AM   #1202
theJBexperience
Impact Rookie
 
theJBexperience's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Boone, NC
Posts: 579
Re: Mega-Merge: 2010 Free Agency Rumors and Reports Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by SBXVII View Post
I was just wondering, what if the trade is not with the Browns. What if there is a trade in the works, word is leaked or slips out but we speculate it's the Browns and it's not. The front office can deny that a trade is in the works with the Browns but yet not be lying.

It's just a fabrication but what if we have a gentlemans agreement with the Rams for them to pick up Bradford and we pick up a player they would be interested in at our pick. We get stuck with the high cost of a #1 pick, trade Campbell to them for Bradford, and give them the pick they wanted at #4 at a lower cost? I know it sounds far fetched but the Rams have been looking into moving out of the pick, and it was rumored they were interested in Campbell. The only positive spot to get Bradford is at #1 otherwise we don't know what the teams prior to us or our trading team are going to want to do. Plus this gives the Rams two players or basically two picks for the #1 spot. They would get Campbell and whoever they wanted us to draft at #4.

It was also rumored that this might be their HC's last year. Supposedly their front office/ownership was not happy with how their season ended and rumor has it he has next year to turn it around. Why would the HC want to chance his job on a Rookie QB when he could get a proven commodity at a reasonable price in Campbell and a draft pick to fill another hole?

I'm not saying I agree with this or if the trade value is even comparable. I was just wondering if any of you other fans thought of this and or perhaps if those with the resources might want to explore this in regards to trade rumors. We would get the player Shanahan covets, the Rams get a decent QB and a player of another spot they need.
I would be all for a deal like this, but we need a veteran QB for Bradford to learn under for at least a season. Grossman would not be it, if we wind up signing him. Jake Plummer coming out of retirement?
theJBexperience is offline  
Old 03-09-2010, 10:26 AM   #1203
sandtrapjack
The Starter
 
sandtrapjack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,994
Re: Mega-Merge: 2010 Free Agency Rumors and Reports Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by SBXVII View Post
I was just wondering, what if the trade is not with the Browns. What if there is a trade in the works, word is leaked or slips out but we speculate it's the Browns and it's not. The front office can deny that a trade is in the works with the Browns but yet not be lying.

It's just a fabrication but what if we have a gentlemans agreement with the Rams for them to pick up Bradford and we pick up a player they would be interested in at our pick. We get stuck with the high cost of a #1 pick, trade Campbell to them for Bradford, and give them the pick they wanted at #4 at a lower cost? I know it sounds far fetched but the Rams have been looking into moving out of the pick, and it was rumored they were interested in Campbell. The only positive spot to get Bradford is at #1 otherwise we don't know what the teams prior to us or our trading team are going to want to do. Plus this gives the Rams two players or basically two picks for the #1 spot. They would get Campbell and whoever they wanted us to draft at #4.

It was also rumored that this might be their HC's last year. Supposedly their front office/ownership was not happy with how their season ended and rumor has it he has next year to turn it around. Why would the HC want to chance his job on a Rookie QB when he could get a proven commodity at a reasonable price in Campbell and a draft pick to fill another hole?

I'm not saying I agree with this or if the trade value is even comparable. I was just wondering if any of you other fans thought of this and or perhaps if those with the resources might want to explore this in regards to trade rumors. We would get the player Shanahan covets, the Rams get a decent QB and a player of another spot they need.
Theres a lot of speculation there, but stranger things have happened.

Believe it or not, I expect Bradfords stock to drop marginally. Clausen or even McCoy may get taken ahead of Bradford.

Fact of the matter is, no one has seen Bradford throw a football since he injured his shoulder and had the surgery. He did not throw at the combine, and it was just announced recently that he will not throw at his pro day at OU. So the jury will still be out on his shoulder going into the draft.

And that can be detremental to where he is selected in April.
sandtrapjack is offline  
Old 03-09-2010, 10:26 AM   #1204
BigHairedAristocrat
Playmaker
 
BigHairedAristocrat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,712
Re: Mega-Merge: 2010 Free Agency Rumors and Reports Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by SBXVII View Post
I was just wondering, what if the trade is not with the Browns. What if there is a trade in the works, word is leaked or slips out but we speculate it's the Browns and it's not. The front office can deny that a trade is in the works with the Browns but yet not be lying.

It's just a fabrication but what if we have a gentlemans agreement with the Rams for them to pick up Bradford and we pick up a player they would be interested in at our pick. We get stuck with the high cost of a #1 pick, trade Campbell to them for Bradford, and give them the pick they wanted at #4 at a lower cost? I know it sounds far fetched but the Rams have been looking into moving out of the pick, and it was rumored they were interested in Campbell. The only positive spot to get Bradford is at #1 otherwise we don't know what the teams prior to us or our trading team are going to want to do. Plus this gives the Rams two players or basically two picks for the #1 spot. They would get Campbell and whoever they wanted us to draft at #4.

It was also rumored that this might be their HC's last year. Supposedly their front office/ownership was not happy with how their season ended and rumor has it he has next year to turn it around. Why would the HC want to chance his job on a Rookie QB when he could get a proven commodity at a reasonable price in Campbell and a draft pick to fill another hole?

I'm not saying I agree with this or if the trade value is even comparable. I was just wondering if any of you other fans thought of this and or perhaps if those with the resources might want to explore this in regards to trade rumors. We would get the player Shanahan covets, the Rams get a decent QB and a player of another spot they need.
Interesting theory, but why go about it that way? Why not just trade the #4 pick and Campbell to the Rams for the #1overall pick prior to the draft?

If something like you suggest were going on, I'd think that SS would get wind of it and pass along the intel. I think its far more likely to take SS at his word and recognize that there simply isnt anything substantial going on at all.
__________________
Dolphins get good press for saving drowning humans.But we only hear about the swimmers theyve pushed ashore.You know who we havent heard from: all the people theyve pushed out to sea.Dolphins dont know what theyre doing-they just like pushing things.
BigHairedAristocrat is offline  
Old 03-09-2010, 10:42 AM   #1205
NYCskinfan82
Playmaker
 
NYCskinfan82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Queens, NYC
Age: 55
Posts: 3,803
Re: Mega-Merge: 2010 Free Agency Rumors and Reports Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by sandtrapjack View Post
Theres a lot of speculation there, but stranger things have happened.

Believe it or not, I expect Bradfords stock to drop marginally. Clausen or even McCoy may get taken ahead of Bradford.

Fact of the matter is, no one has seen Bradford throw a football since he injured his shoulder and had the surgery. He did not throw at the combine, and it was just announced recently that he will not throw at his pro day at OU. So the jury will still be out on his shoulder going into the draft.

And that can be detremental to where he is selected in April.

As it was pointed out to me yesterday Bradford's showcase day is the 25th.
NYCskinfan82 is offline  
Old 03-09-2010, 10:51 AM   #1206
Gtothearry
The Starter
 
Gtothearry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,525
Re: Mega-Merge: 2010 Free Agency Rumors and Reports Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by sandtrapjack View Post
Theres a lot of speculation there, but stranger things have happened.

Believe it or not, I expect Bradfords stock to drop marginally. Clausen or even McCoy may get taken ahead of Bradford.

Fact of the matter is, no one has seen Bradford throw a football since he injured his shoulder and had the surgery. He did not throw at the combine, and it was just announced recently that he will not throw at his pro day at OU. So the jury will still be out on his shoulder going into the draft.

And that can be detremental to where he is selected in April.
If he doesn't throw at all before the draft he will definitely drop.
Gtothearry is offline  
Old 03-09-2010, 11:20 AM   #1207
Monkeydad
Living Legend
 
Monkeydad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 46
Posts: 17,460
Re: Mega-Merge: 2010 Free Agency Rumors and Reports Thread

I'm expecting ARE to perform well in Pittsburgh. Just because that's our luck, no other reason.
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster
Monkeydad is offline  
Old 03-09-2010, 11:24 AM   #1208
freddyg12
Playmaker
 
freddyg12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,540
Re: Mega-Merge: 2010 Free Agency Rumors and Reports Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Buster View Post
I'm expecting ARE to perform well in Pittsburgh. Just because that's our luck, no other reason.
Well he performed well here at wr, and I would think he'll have another solid year as a #3 or 4 wr, maybe 30-40 catches w/a few tds.

If you'res saying he'll perform well in punt returning, that's a different story.
freddyg12 is offline  
Old 03-09-2010, 11:25 AM   #1209
CultBrennan59
Pro Bowl
 
CultBrennan59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,526
Re: Mega-Merge: 2010 Free Agency Rumors and Reports Thread

and what happend to larry foote yesterday, is he still at redskins park?
__________________
"Anyones better than Madieu Williams"
CultBrennan59 is offline  
Old 03-09-2010, 11:26 AM   #1210
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: Mega-Merge: 2010 Free Agency Rumors and Reports Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by theJBexperience View Post
I would be all for a deal like this, but we need a veteran QB for Bradford to learn under for at least a season. Grossman would not be it, if we wind up signing him. Jake Plummer coming out of retirement?
BHA will be thrilled to hear someone else is considering Plummer
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline  
Old 03-09-2010, 11:27 AM   #1211
Monkeydad
Living Legend
 
Monkeydad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 46
Posts: 17,460
Re: Mega-Merge: 2010 Free Agency Rumors and Reports Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by freddyg12 View Post
Well he performed well here at wr, and I would think he'll have another solid year as a #3 or 4 wr, maybe 30-40 catches w/a few tds.

If you'res saying he'll perform well in punt returning, that's a different story.
Overall.


However, if we DO play them in the SB, I want him to fumble and cost the game.
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster
Monkeydad is offline  
Old 03-09-2010, 11:28 AM   #1212
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: Mega-Merge: 2010 Free Agency Rumors and Reports Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chico23231 View Post
I think he deserves a look and think as a back up to replace Collins as the number 2 I would feel better about than Rex Grossman. More competition to the roster....
Everyone seems to believe that DA is going to end up in Arizona, though some have started to speculate Carolina
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline  
Old 03-09-2010, 11:29 AM   #1213
Monkeydad
Living Legend
 
Monkeydad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 46
Posts: 17,460
Re: Mega-Merge: 2010 Free Agency Rumors and Reports Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by CultBrennan59 View Post
and what happend to larry foote yesterday, is he still at redskins park?
Left without signing (yet) because he's also scheduled to visit the Cardinals later this week. The Steelers are also interested in getting him back.
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster
Monkeydad is offline  
Old 03-09-2010, 11:29 AM   #1214
PHazard
Special Teams
 
PHazard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Originally Portsmouth, VA but now Ocala, FL
Posts: 207
Re: Mega-Merge: 2010 Free Agency Rumors and Reports Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Buster View Post
I'm expecting ARE to perform well in Pittsburgh. Just because that's our luck, no other reason.
Yeah i was just thinkin that Antwaan Randle El would become a beast punt returner again lol

In other news, i think we should look at Richie Incognito for more competition at guard. i know he's regarded as "the dirtiest player in the game" but i dont think it could hurt to at least look at him or set up a visit. He's solid and he's only 26. Previously worked with Jim Haslett in St. Louis. Also saw that a Dewayne Smith isnt being retained by the lions he's a bigger DE that maybe we can get to play opposite phillip daniels or in a rotation. he's 29.
__________________
If "The Future is Now" why would we use our #4 Pick on a QB who will spend the 1st year on the bench?
PHazard is offline  
Old 03-09-2010, 11:30 AM   #1215
Monkeydad
Living Legend
 
Monkeydad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 46
Posts: 17,460
Re: Mega-Merge: 2010 Free Agency Rumors and Reports Thread

Antonio Bryant coming to visit:

Quote:
Bucs acquire WR Reggie Brown from Eagles

Bryant's agent, Lamont Smith, said Bryant had also arranged a visit with the Washington Redskins that could prove more enticing as Bryant would apparently be a second receiver behind Chad Ochocinco in Cincinnati.
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster
Monkeydad is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.96162 seconds with 12 queries