Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Smoot Lays The Smack Down (Redskins vs. Eagles)

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-27-2009, 08:41 AM   #16
skins89moss
Playmaker
 
skins89moss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 3,634
Re: Smoot Lays The Smack Down (Redskins vs. Eagles)

Is it just me notice anytime the Refs throw a flag they some how huddle up and pick the flag up.
__________________
www.islandstyleflowers.com Home of the Hawaiian Foam Flowers and Kukui Nut Leis. Great selections and best prices. Redskins Fan Since 1972
skins89moss is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 10-27-2009, 09:11 AM   #17
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,763
Re: Smoot Lays The Smack Down (Redskins vs. Eagles)

Looked like zone coverage on the TD and Rogers was expecting help over the top. I think Horton blew the coverage myself. Especially given his look after the play.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2009, 09:14 AM   #18
Southpaw
The Starter
 
Southpaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: So. MD
Age: 46
Posts: 1,319
Re: Smoot Lays The Smack Down (Redskins vs. Eagles)

Quote:
Originally Posted by jdlea View Post
I've gotta add Carlos Rodgers to that list. What the hell was he doing on that touchdown pass? He's supposed the "cover" corner and the double move by DeSean absolutely killed him. My bigger problem? There was absolutely no effort on his part after getting torched. No turn and sprint, he just continued to waltz his way in the general direction of the WR who just torched him.
I agree, but I think that Rogers' failures are more indicative of what's wrong with the organization than him forgetting how to cover. Watching him play, it looks like he's already mailed it in for the season. I don't think he wants to be here next season, but half assing it on the field isn't going to make any other teams break the bank for him.

I'd also add Laron Landry to the list. He's been invisible in most games this season(including last night), and I can't think of anything he's done of note, outside of horribly missing open field tackles.

And while Heyer had a bad game, the entire offensive line deserves to be on the list. There is absolutely nothing that they excel at anymore. They cannot block for the pass or the run. I know a lot of people are down on Portis this season, but there were several plays last night where he immediately had two defenders in his face as soon as he was handed the ball. Purple Jesus wouldn't even be effective under those circumstances.
Southpaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2009, 09:19 AM   #19
jdlea
Playmaker
 
jdlea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, VA
Age: 40
Posts: 3,109
Re: Smoot Lays The Smack Down (Redskins vs. Eagles)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72 View Post
Looked like zone coverage on the TD and Rogers was expecting help over the top. I think Horton blew the coverage myself. Especially given his look after the play.
I suppose it could have been, I thought he got beat a little further down the field, but it was about 15 yards from the LOS. I still think it was man with safety help. I'm thinking Horton should have been there sooner, but there's no excuse for that kind of coverage. Also, if it were zone, there wouldn't have been much reason for Carlos to continue to follow once the ball went up and Desean was 10 yards behind him. Finally, the Skins only brought 4 on that play which (in most cases) means the D is playing 2 Man Under where it's man with safety help.

I'd have to assume that was the coverage, particularly on a 3rd and 23. The thinking should be, "McNabb can't run for it, why open up holes in a zone? Go man with safety help on each side and give up the underneath if they want it."
jdlea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2009, 09:20 AM   #20
redsk1
The Starter
 
redsk1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,351
Re: Smoot Lays The Smack Down (Redskins vs. Eagles)

JC had a bad game. His lineman were horrible too. What more needs to be said?

Our hurry up offense takes WAY too long. There's no sense of urgency. JC has been around too long to be that slow in our hurry up offense.

We have some talented defensive lineman. They are pretty fun to watch.

I'd put Rock Cartright in the offense some how some way. Seems to hit the non-holes hard and runs fast. Why not? Not sure about his blocking though...
redsk1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2009, 09:24 AM   #21
skinsguy
Pro Bowl
 
skinsguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,766
Re: Smoot Lays The Smack Down (Redskins vs. Eagles)

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
Something tells me the Bruce Allen era is starting real soon. Will Gruden be far behind? My source still says no go on Gruden. I’m believing that less and less. But anyway, that’s all hearsay and speculation.

What’s fact is that people need to get smacked. Let’s get right to it

Antwaan Randle-El :Benched:

Stephon Heyer :confused:

Casey Rabach :frusty:

Jason Campbell

Well, I think that just about covers it for this week. Please note the Smackdown Shuttle will be on temporary hiatus over the next few weeks. In the meanwhile, keep an eye out for the Bring the Pain PainTrain to come rolling through your warpath neighborhood
Couldn't have said it better myself.
__________________
"Fire Up That Diesel!"
skinsguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2009, 09:28 AM   #22
jdlea
Playmaker
 
jdlea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, VA
Age: 40
Posts: 3,109
Re: Smoot Lays The Smack Down (Redskins vs. Eagles)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Southpaw View Post
I agree, but I think that Rogers' failures are more indicative of what's wrong with the organization than him forgetting how to cover. Watching him play, it looks like he's already mailed it in for the season. I don't think he wants to be here next season, but half assing it on the field isn't going to make any other teams break the bank for him.

I'd also add Laron Landry to the list. He's been invisible in most games this season(including last night), and I can't think of anything he's done of note, outside of horribly missing open field tackles.


And while Heyer had a bad game, the entire offensive line deserves to be on the list. There is absolutely nothing that they excel at anymore. They cannot block for the pass or the run. I know a lot of people are down on Portis this season, but there were several plays last night where he immediately had two defenders in his face as soon as he was handed the ball. Purple Jesus wouldn't even be effective under those circumstances.
This. However, I would say that Landry's shortcomings are mutually his and the schemes. It's difficult to be a playmaker from the "angel" position. We all know Sean did it, but Sean was a once-in-a-generation talent and it's difficult to expect that from Landry. Landry is, IMO, at fault because he's an immature player always looking for the kill shot (much the way Sean did before the light went on and he became dominant). I think the Skins should think about moving LL back to strong safety and seeing if Kareem can hack it as the FS (Angel).

As for Rodgers, you can't call out ownership and then show up and play like THAT. I don't like him essentially being wasted by starting him 10-15 yards away from the WRs all the time, but that should have aided in his ability to stay with Desean on that play.

Outside of that play and the end around, I think the D played pretty well, not that it matters.

One final thought: you're 100% correct about the O Line. Heyer is bad at LT and serviceable at RT (I think he'd be a great backup), but the rest of the O Line was absolutely horrendous the entire game as well. There's no way any QB can survive this. It's looking like 2003 when it was open season on Ramsey at this point.
jdlea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2009, 11:10 AM   #23
BDBohnzie
Playmaker
 
BDBohnzie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Frederick, MD
Age: 46
Posts: 4,628
Re: Smoot Lays The Smack Down (Redskins vs. Eagles)

On the long TD pass, McNabb throws a pump fake to the right...from which, and we won't know unless we get an overview angle, it's possible that Horton bit on the fake, hence why he wasn't back in deep coverage. CBs don't usually drop receivers like Rogers did unless they are expecting help over top...hopefully GTripp will have more on that play during his analysis of the game.

This OL is atrocious. They are going to get Campbell killed. Then again, they planned protection schemes with Cooley in the game, and while he's not a great blocking TE, Davis is worse. Rabach had several mishaps, including a rally killer inside the 5 on that 4th down.

The analysts mentioned Campbell not setting his feet to throw, and even broke out footage of Gruden's camp kids doing a set drill. I think Campbell's right ankle/foot is worse that they are letting on. Since it's his plant foot, it looks like he's not able to put much pressure on it, and to throw, he's shuffling his feet. He's also playing scared. He's afraid to stand up in the pocket, but who can blame him. The OL is giving him virtually no time to get through his progressions. I'm hoping that the bye week allows him to rest and get back on track, or at least get Collins and Woodson reps with the first team.

Randle El took his eyes off the ball on that punt. Plain and simple. And quite frankly, with Thomas, Kelly, Davis, and Mitchell, he should be on his way out.

ESPN for showing Fletcher puking during their pregame shots. No one needs to see that...
__________________
Bad Things man, I mean bad things...

“WE TOOK HIM IN THE SIXTH ROUND SO WE'RE NOT SMART EITHER.” - Shanny on what the Skins saw in Alfred Morris
BDBohnzie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2009, 02:36 PM   #24
sportscurmudgeon
Playmaker
 
sportscurmudgeon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,159
Re: Smoot Lays The Smack Down (Redskins vs. Eagles)

Smootsmack:

Might I dare to follow your lead and add to your listing here?


Montgomery:

Rabach:

Rogers:

Horton: :confused:


Sherm Lewis:

Vinny:
__________________
The Sports Curmudgeon
www.sportscurmudgeon.com
But don't get me wrong, I love sports...
sportscurmudgeon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2009, 01:21 AM   #25
tryfuhl
Gamebreaker
 
tryfuhl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Waldorf, MD
Age: 41
Posts: 12,514
Re: Smoot Lays The Smack Down (Redskins vs. Eagles)

What was your issue with Lewis?
tryfuhl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2009, 12:29 PM   #26
sportscurmudgeon
Playmaker
 
sportscurmudgeon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,159
Re: Smoot Lays The Smack Down (Redskins vs. Eagles)

My issue with Lewis is very simple. He should have had a huge advantage in that game because there was no "book" on him calling plays. The Eagles' defensive folks had no tendencies on him; they didn't know if he would pass or throw or quick-kick on any given down. Teams look for the element of surprise in playcalling; Lewis had it in his hip pocket; he did next to nothing with it. He should have had the Eagles' defense in a spot where they needed to cover every angle because they didn't know what he would do next.


Now maybe I was dozing through that part of the game where the Redskins' offense had left the Eagles' defensive players and defensive playcallers bedazzled. If so, tell me when that was so I can go back to my DVR and check the replays...


If the "playcaller" needs to have an intermediate person in the loop to call the pass protection schemes for the plays that the "playcaller" has called, then the only proper word for the "playcaller" is UNPREPARED. Maybe the Skins should hire another consultant to give Sherm Lewis another set of eyes so that the new guy can get to call plays in some future game this year. After all, it worked out so well here.


Have I explained what my issue with Lewis was?
__________________
The Sports Curmudgeon
www.sportscurmudgeon.com
But don't get me wrong, I love sports...
sportscurmudgeon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2009, 12:34 PM   #27
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: Smoot Lays The Smack Down (Redskins vs. Eagles)

Fair points SC. But I think (hope?) we'll see more of Lewis' impact in a couple of weeks. Monday night I think he was just getting a basic sense of what his offense could do.
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2009, 01:26 PM   #28
diehardskin2982
Another Year, another mess.
 
diehardskin2982's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,581
Re: Smoot Lays The Smack Down (Redskins vs. Eagles)

smootsmack what is the rumors off a change in our front office? will there be a exstensive search or is bruce allen the front runner?
__________________
That got ugly fast
diehardskin2982 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2009, 01:28 PM   #29
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: Smoot Lays The Smack Down (Redskins vs. Eagles)

Quote:
Originally Posted by diehardskin2982 View Post
smootsmack what is the rumors off a change in our front office? will there be a exstensive search or is bruce allen the front runner?
Haven't really asked in the last week or so for any update. But I would say Shanahan is still the front runner, Allen #2
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2009, 01:28 PM   #30
CRedskinsRule
Living Legend
 
CRedskinsRule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 57
Posts: 21,591
Re: Smoot Lays The Smack Down (Redskins vs. Eagles)

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
Fair points SC. But I think (hope?) we'll see more of Lewis' impact in a couple of weeks. Monday night I think he was just getting a basic sense of what his offense could do.
Also, he was only with the team for three weeks. I suppose it is an excuse, but I think it's valid.
CRedskinsRule is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:03 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 1.02162 seconds with 12 queries