![]() |
![]() |
#31 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Davidsonville
Posts: 1,783
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
Advertisements |
![]() |
#32 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 58
Posts: 21,605
|
Re: Surprise teams in '09?
Quote:
![]() I would not be shocked to see the Bills in 1st or 2nd place in their division. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#33 |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 70
|
Re: Surprise teams in '09?
we gotta make the playoffs 10 - 11 wins very hopeful
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#34 | |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 31 Spooner St.
Age: 50
Posts: 9,534
|
Re: Surprise teams in '09?
Quote:
Buffalo doesn't know what they are in for. The reason they have been even mediocre is good team work, take that chemistry away and throw in a cancer, and you have a recipe for disaster.
__________________
Zoltan is ZESTY! - courtesy of joeredskin |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#35 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Samoa
Posts: 180
|
Re: Surprise teams in '09?
AFC - Bengals (meow)
NFC - Lions (meow) I'm following their progress this year and their rookies. Probably in the next 3 years they will be a team to reckon with.
__________________
"If you don't wear a jock strap, you're going to be in trouble." Bugel |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#36 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,369
|
Re: Surprise teams in '09?
The Bengals have one of the worst ownerships IMO, I think they continue to waste away Carson Palmer's talent. Unless the Steelers and Baltimore take a major nose dive, I don't see them being successful.
__________________
R.I.P. #21 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#37 | |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Parkton, MD
Posts: 5,779
|
Re: Surprise teams in '09?
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#38 |
The Starter
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 1,373
|
Re: Surprise teams in '09?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#39 |
Naega jeil jal naga
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 39
Posts: 14,750
|
Re: Surprise teams in '09?
Should have opened the thread with "no spoilers"
![]() Ummm lets see........San Francisco, St. Louis, Houston, Buffalo, Kansas City, and Washington are all nominees for surprise teams. I say Houston, Washington, and St. Louis will do well next year.
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice." - Scooter "I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now." - FRPLG |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#40 |
The Starter
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 1,373
|
Re: Surprise teams in '09?
Houston looks good.
St Louis may take some time for Spags to get the defense right. KC. Im not sold on Cassel. could be a product of the NE system. plus havin Moss and Welker can make any QB look good. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#41 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 162
|
Re: Surprise teams in '09?
I think the surprise team this year will be Dallas or Philly.
Surprisingly bad that is, I think one of them is headed to 5-11, but I don't know who yet, leaning towards Dallas. Redskins as surprisingly good, also the Texans and San Fran. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#42 |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 70
|
Re: Surprise teams in '09?
lions sorta haaaa
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#43 |
The Starter
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 1,373
|
Re: Surprise teams in '09?
Well the Lions can only improve.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#44 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: New Orleans, LA- via VA
Age: 47
Posts: 710
|
Re: Surprise teams in '09?
__________________
Hail to The REDSKINS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#45 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 58
Posts: 21,605
|
Re: Surprise teams in '09?
Quote:
I say all that to again make the point that TO's presence this year will be amazingly positive for Buffalo. They may even get to the 2nd round of the playoffs, I doubt they make it to the AFC Championship, but if they can take on NE they may very well have a shot. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|