Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum


Statistical Projections: Redskins v Cowboys

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-16-2008, 12:54 AM   #1
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
Statistical Projections: Redskins v Cowboys

Some statistical projections for the outcome of the game.

ESPN ACCUSCORE

Cowboys = 60.6%
Redskins = 39.4%

ESPN - Dallas Cowboys at Washington Redskins Predictions - NFL Football

I don't really understand AccuScore. In the Composite Index, (Rush O, Rush D, Pass O, Pass D) the Redskins score a +31.5. That seems pretty encompassing of all possible results, special teams aside. The individual stats look pretty even, with Washington's players having a slight advantage. I have no idea why it's projecting Dallas as 60%.

ADVANCED NFL STATS' GENERIC WIN PROBABILITY (GWP)

Redskins = 78%
Cowboys = 22%

Advanced NFL Stats: Week 11 Game Probabilities

This system pretty much loves us. We are the No. 2 overall team in it. It slightly overvalues us because to eliminate interception luck (which is a huge negative indicator), the system simply ignores interceptions. Obviously, when you employ Carlos Rogers, this change is going to benefit you. Other than that, it's pretty accurate.

FOOTBALL OUTSIDERS TOTAL DVOA

Redskins = 12.6%
Cowboys = -11.2%

FOOTBALL OUTSIDERS: Football analysis and NFL stats for the Moneyball era - Authors of Pro Football Prospectus 2008

Obviously this isn't great for a prediction because it just factors in what the Cowboys accomplished with Johnson and Bollinger in as equal to the other games, and obviously the 12.6% was accomplished with Portis, but we'll see.

There seems to be a consensus that the Redskins are the better team, and there should be. Still with that knowledge in hand, a lot of people think the Cowboys can pull this out, and vegas is slightly bullish on Dallas as well. We'll have to see who wins out: stats, or Tony Romo's fan club.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 11-16-2008, 01:23 AM   #2
GusFrerotte
Registered User
 
GusFrerotte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Detroit area
Posts: 4,153
Re: Statistical Projections: Redskins v Cowboys

Not so sure about that stuff G. When healthy I think we are the better team, but we are pretty banged up, even discounting Portis. Romo is back and he has a bona fide WR corp that has the potential to do some damage. Other than Moss, and maybe Randle El, we don't have jack. Outside of Moss and Cooley we really don't have real threats. With the running game, is Betts really going to be fine in the cold weather coming off an injury? I see this game as a potential debacle.
GusFrerotte is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2008, 01:35 AM   #3
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
Re: Statistical Projections: Redskins v Cowboys

Quote:
Originally Posted by GusFrerotte View Post
Not so sure about that stuff G. When healthy I think we are the better team, but we are pretty banged up, even discounting Portis. Romo is back and he has a bona fide WR corp that has the potential to do some damage. Other than Moss, and maybe Randle El, we don't have jack. Outside of Moss and Cooley we really don't have real threats. With the running game, is Betts really going to be fine in the cold weather coming off an injury? I see this game as a potential debacle.
Still, if there's a huge discrepancy with injuries, that's one thing, but Portis is just one man. I think Betts will be fine in the same way Marion Barber will be fine.

A lot in this game depends on Moss, but his hammy didn't flare up in practice, so I'm confident he can produce.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2008, 01:48 AM   #4
Lotus
Fire Bruce NOW
 
Lotus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 11,434
Re: Statistical Projections: Redskins v Cowboys

Quote:
Originally Posted by GusFrerotte View Post
Not so sure about that stuff G. When healthy I think we are the better team, but we are pretty banged up, even discounting Portis. Romo is back and he has a bona fide WR corp that has the potential to do some damage. Other than Moss, and maybe Randle El, we don't have jack. Outside of Moss and Cooley we really don't have real threats. With the running game, is Betts really going to be fine in the cold weather coming off an injury? I see this game as a potential debacle.
Don't forget that Romo's pinkie is still ailing somewhat.
__________________
Bruce Allen when in charge alone: 4-12 (.250)
Bruce Allen's overall Redskins record : 28-52 (.350)
Vinny Cerrato's record when in charge alone: 52-65 (.444)
Vinny's overall Redskins record: 62-82 (.430)
We won more with Vinny
Lotus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2008, 09:27 AM   #5
doughtydoubter
Impact Rookie
 
doughtydoubter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: the glorious city of DC
Posts: 740
Re: Statistical Projections: Redskins v Cowboys

stupid romo and his pinkie...i hope jason taylor breaks his index
doughtydoubter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2008, 02:05 PM   #6
CRedskinsRule
Living Legend
 
CRedskinsRule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 57
Posts: 21,209
Re: Statistical Projections: Redskins v Cowboys

I wonder, do you think Accuscore just disregarded the last 3 Cowboys games? seems really out of proportion to me.
CRedskinsRule is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.08828 seconds with 11 queries