Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


should we have traded ramsey to miami?

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-14-2004, 08:49 AM   #16
joecrisp
The Starter
 
joecrisp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Charlottesville, VA
Age: 49
Posts: 1,501
I believe BrunellFan and smootsmack are both right. Hindsight is 20/20, and the trade would have been for Miami's 2004 first rounder, not next year's pick. At the time I would have disagreed with the move, considering Ramsey's bright potential and relatively low contract value-- plus the fact they probably would have used the pick on another quarterback-- and I would disagree with the move even now, for the same reasons.

Right now, the Redskins have one big $40+ million mistake at QB. If they had made that move, there's a chance they'd now have two of them. If not an expensive rookie, then another expensive veteran.

Trading away Ramsey would have only compounded the error of trading for Brunell, and would have only extended the excruciating waiting period for another quarterback to be prepared enough in Gibb's opinion to replace Brunell as the starter.
joecrisp is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 11-14-2004, 10:44 AM   #17
djnemo65
Playmaker
 
djnemo65's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2,836
Quote:
Originally Posted by smootsmack
I'm pretty sure that the deal was the Dolphins 1st round pick from 2004, so the 20th overall. I like Ramsey and wouldn't have traded him, but I can't shake this feeling that he's not playing because Gibbs wants to preserve the image of what Ramsey can accomplish to potential trade suitors in the offseason.
yeah, i guess you are probably right smootsmack. that deal was discussed prior to the draft last year.
djnemo65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2004, 12:36 PM   #18
offiss
Registered User
 
offiss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: sparta, new jersey [ northern jersey ]
Age: 60
Posts: 3,097
If Ramsey was really on the block we would have had more team's offering up a #1 at least, than just Miami, you don't think team's saw his potential moving the ball with no protection whatsoever under SS? Gm's all over the league would have been thinking to themselves what could this kid do with protection even if it was minimal?

Bottom line Ramsey is better than Bree's and has proven to be better over his first 2 year's, case and point, after last season which QB would have been more coveted by other NFL team's? Not even a question Ramsey, now that Ramsey is sitting the bench because Gibb's can't swallow the Brunell blunder all of a sudden he can't play? Im just tired of hearing the old monday morning grass is alway's greener on the other side of the fence QB's.
offiss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2004, 01:37 PM   #19
SKINSnCANES
Pro Bowl
 
SKINSnCANES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: New Jersey
Age: 43
Posts: 5,454
Ramsey only played once this year, in a sub situation. Granted he sucked but its a tough situation to put someone it, trying to come from behind. If Ramsey got some starts and played the full game I think our offense will be much more productive and we can run with him for years to come.
__________________
"I'm used to winning, coming from the University of Miami. " Clinton Portis
SKINSnCANES is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 2.02163 seconds with 12 queries