Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


JC is not what I thought.

Locker Room Main Forum


Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-05-2008, 04:43 PM   #196
jgalecpa
Special Teams
 
jgalecpa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 458
Re: JC is not what I thought.

Anybody have good information on what JC's Wunderlich test score was?

J-Dawg
__________________
Theismann: You're wrong, the rule is wrong, the refs are wrong, and I'm right
jgalecpa is offline  

Advertisements
Old 09-05-2008, 04:48 PM   #197
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: JC is not what I thought.

You mean his Wonderlic? Yeah, but it's irrelevant what his score was either time he took it. Ryan Fitzpatrick had close to a 40, better than any starting QB in the league. How many teams would prefer Fitzpatrick as their starter?
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline  
Old 09-05-2008, 04:49 PM   #198
cpayne5
Playmaker
 
cpayne5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,807
Re: JC is not what I thought.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jgalecpa View Post
Anybody have good information on what JC's Wunderlich test score was?

J-Dawg
Here's a good link that shows Wonderlic scores by QBs over the years.
Rumors and Rants: Bring On The Annual Wonderlic Fun
__________________
"It's not about what you've done, but what's been done for you."
cpayne5 is offline  
Old 09-05-2008, 04:57 PM   #199
SC Skins Fan
The Starter
 
SC Skins Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 1,555
Re: JC is not what I thought.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jgalecpa View Post
Anybody have good information on what JC's Wunderlich test score was?

J-Dawg
Stupid metric that we have covered too many times. What did you get on your SATs? I'll tell you mine if you tell me yours.
__________________
It has taken a long time, but I have finally realized that nothing I say about the Redskins will have any effect upon anything the Redskins do.
SC Skins Fan is offline  
Old 09-05-2008, 06:55 PM   #200
prinzeofmoval
Special Teams
 
prinzeofmoval's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 432
Re: JC is not what I thought.

Quote:
Originally Posted by SC Skins Fan View Post
Stupid metric that we have covered too many times. What did you get on your SATs? I'll tell you mine if you tell me yours.
Wonderlic or SAT scores huh? How was his 2nd grade math scores more like it, cause he still doesn't know feet or yards..
__________________
I laugh at you Colt Brennan haters. You're the same guys who didn't wanna bench Brunell for Campbell. The tables will turn.
prinzeofmoval is offline  
Old 09-05-2008, 07:04 PM   #201
cpayne5
Playmaker
 
cpayne5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,807
Re: JC is not what I thought.

Quote:
Originally Posted by prinzeofmoval View Post
Wonderlic or SAT scores huh? How was his 2nd grade math scores more like it, cause he still doesn't know feet or yards..
Wow, that was genius.
__________________
"It's not about what you've done, but what's been done for you."
cpayne5 is offline  
Old 09-05-2008, 07:58 PM   #202
memphisskin
Impact Rookie
 
memphisskin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Nashville, TN
Age: 53
Posts: 960
Re: JC is not what I thought.

Doesn't matter who you put behind center when the offensive line is breaking down up the middle. And it really doesn't matter who lines up, because the savior will always be the guy holding the clipboard, only if he really was the answer he'd be behind center and not holding a clipboard.
memphisskin is offline  
Old 09-05-2008, 08:12 PM   #203
djnemo65
Playmaker
 
djnemo65's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2,836
Re: JC is not what I thought.

Campbell didn't have a good game but the idea that what went down yesterday would definitively change your opinion of him is aggressively ass-stupid. He made the same mistakes he has always made while also showing the same physical gifts (at times). 4 years in this is who he has always been. I think he can improve but the game didn't change my opinion of him in any way.
djnemo65 is offline  
Old 09-05-2008, 08:25 PM   #204
prinzeofmoval
Special Teams
 
prinzeofmoval's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 432
Re: JC is not what I thought.

Okay so we can't be mad for him getting jammed up look at Brett, Tony and Tom last year. The had a miserable time and Jason is no where in their league. But he doesn't have the killer instinct that we need in a quarterback. I don't see Ben, Peyton, Brady, Favre or even Mcnabb and Romo in him. We need that fire to put us over the hedge.
__________________
I laugh at you Colt Brennan haters. You're the same guys who didn't wanna bench Brunell for Campbell. The tables will turn.
prinzeofmoval is offline  
Old 09-05-2008, 08:53 PM   #205
Redskin Warrior
The Starter
 
Redskin Warrior's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Montgomery, AL
Posts: 1,544
Re: JC is not what I thought.

Quote:
Originally Posted by prinzeofmoval View Post
Okay so we can't be mad for him getting jammed up look at Brett, Tony and Tom last year. The had a miserable time and Jason is no where in their league. But he doesn't have the killer instinct that we need in a quarterback. I don't see Ben, Peyton, Brady, Favre or even Mcnabb and Romo in him. We need that fire to put us over the hedge.
All have better o-lines and WR's other than the Eagles then us there is not comparing them to Jason.
__________________
WIN, LOSE OR DRAW I'M A DIE-HARD REDSKIN FAN!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lotus View Post
First they ban winning...now this?
Redskin Warrior is offline  
Old 09-05-2008, 09:40 PM   #206
prinzeofmoval
Special Teams
 
prinzeofmoval's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 432
Re: JC is not what I thought.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Redskin Warrior View Post
All have better o-lines and WR's other than the Eagles then us there is not comparing them to Jason.
How do you figure they have better recievers? Outside of Peyton who really does everybody has one good one with the rest being role players. O-Line you got me there.
__________________
I laugh at you Colt Brennan haters. You're the same guys who didn't wanna bench Brunell for Campbell. The tables will turn.
prinzeofmoval is offline  
Old 09-05-2008, 10:21 PM   #207
SUNRA
The Starter
 
SUNRA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,680
Re: JC is not what I thought.

Quote:
Originally Posted by prinzeofmoval View Post
How do you figure they have better recievers? Outside of Peyton who really does everybody has one good one with the rest being role players. O-Line you got me there.
JC often looks lethargic like Eli. You really can't tell what he's thinking and you certainly don't see him getting excited when he misses an open receiver. I don't know where this team will be in two weeks, but Jason has to get it right in 10 days.
__________________
Redskins Member since 1970
SUNRA is offline  
Old 09-05-2008, 11:06 PM   #208
GusFrerotte
Registered User
 
GusFrerotte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Detroit area
Posts: 4,153
Re: JC is not what I thought.

Wait til weeks 5-7 til we truly evaluate how JC is doing. If JC doesn't experience any significant improvement maybe we do have a QB problem, but til then all we can say is that he had a crappy opening game.
GusFrerotte is offline  
Old 09-05-2008, 11:08 PM   #209
GusFrerotte
Registered User
 
GusFrerotte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Detroit area
Posts: 4,153
Re: JC is not what I thought.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jgalecpa View Post
Anybody have good information on what JC's Wunderlich test score was?

J-Dawg
Dawg, I don't think the problem is JC's intellect but from what I remember his score wasn't too great.
GusFrerotte is offline  
Old 09-06-2008, 09:53 AM   #210
theJBexperience
Impact Rookie
 
theJBexperience's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Boone, NC
Posts: 579
Re: JC is not what I thought.

JC did look rough at times: he held onto the ball too long, he wasn't very mobile in the pocket, he stared down his primary receiver, and he threw under the chains too much. But he didn't have a whole lot of help. Poor pass protection threw off the timing on some routes like the deep ball to Santana that could've been a TD. Even when he made good throws, there were drops. Moss started running for some YAC without bringing it in, and Thrash had a beautiful deep ball bounce off his hands and shoulder pads. Penalties deflated drives. All those mistakes and the Giants D kept the offense from getting into a rhythm. Hopefully, New Orleans' D is still just as porous as it was last year, and the O can get it going next week.
theJBexperience is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:31 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.22990 seconds with 12 queries