Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


JC is not what I thought.

Locker Room Main Forum


Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-05-2008, 11:30 AM   #151
doughtydoubter
Impact Rookie
 
doughtydoubter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: the glorious city of DC
Posts: 740
Re: JC is not what I thought.

it was forever ago and i couldnt remember my password and any email i had it on was loooong gone it was over 4years ago.
doughtydoubter is offline  

Advertisements
Old 09-05-2008, 11:35 AM   #152
SUNRA
The Starter
 
SUNRA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,680
Re: JC is not what I thought.

What Jamie Dukes pointed out is the inept offensive play calling on third down conversions. There is no way Jim Zorn will be successful with the playcalling he defended when asked by Sonny Jergenson. Two plays were called for Cooley and we were off side on both of them." Two plays to Cooley? Where was Ladell Betts and Mike Sellers to offset the tempo of the running game? Zorn should allow the running game to develop and then have the receivers run beyond the first down marker to have more success. Jason Campbell has to erase eight seasons of different offensive coordinators and stop locking in on one receiver. This was the worst performance I have seen for a first time coach for the Redskins. Spurrier wasn't this bad.
__________________
Redskins Member since 1970
SUNRA is offline  
Old 09-05-2008, 11:41 AM   #153
SUNRA
The Starter
 
SUNRA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,680
Re: JC is not what I thought.

Quote:
Originally Posted by SouperMeister View Post
Show me a QB who didn't suck at first in the WCO. Brett Favre was a turnover machine at first. I don't expect Campbell to look smooth in the offense until next season. He has to trust that his 2nd and 3rd reads will be there, which was the problem on the first play. For him to become a great QB, we have to be willing to suffer through Campbell's growing pains.
It's unfortunate that a QB such as JC has to undergoe another offensive playbook. But his inability to make the reads will improve after this game. He certainly tried to get the ball out on third down conversions. But the playcalling was not favorable. This is a learning tool for everyone and if Jim Zorn thought he was going to ride this West Coast offense in the NFC East without serious opposition he is seriously mistaken.
__________________
Redskins Member since 1970
SUNRA is offline  
Old 09-05-2008, 11:41 AM   #154
Twilbert07
Impact Rookie
 
Twilbert07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Age: 60
Posts: 594
Re: JC is not what I thought.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72 View Post
With the way JC looked he might want to spend MORE time with him.
Or with Colt Brennan! Just kidding of course. But I think we'll find out over the next month that JC is not the QB of the future. I know it will suck, but that's my gut feeling. He took several steps backward after only being OK last year before his injuiry.
Twilbert07 is offline  
Old 09-05-2008, 11:46 AM   #155
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: JC is not what I thought.

I think the numbers speak for themselves. Campbell got me 8.66 Yahoo fantasy points. Whereas Manning only had 8.27 points. So clearly Campbell is the better QB
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline  
Old 09-05-2008, 11:50 AM   #156
Jamaican'Skin
The Starter
 
Jamaican'Skin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Kingston, Jamaica
Age: 38
Posts: 2,418
Re: JC is not what I thought.

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
I think the numbers speak for themselves. Campbell got me 8.66 Yahoo fantasy points. Whereas Manning only had 8.27 points. So clearly Campbell is the better QB

Well just so you know, I have Colt Brennan as my starting QB and he got 25.0675 pts by just sitting on the bench
Jamaican'Skin is offline  
Old 09-05-2008, 12:03 PM   #157
SBXVII
Franchise Player
 
SBXVII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
Re: JC is not what I thought.

Quote:
Originally Posted by cpayne5
There's much more to it than the play of your QB. JC didn't look great tonight, but name me someone who did who wasn't returning kicks. JC gets a pass in my book until it becomes obvious that he is the weakest link.

Portis, Fletcher, Brooks.


Burress, Jacobs, Tuck......

Last edited by SBXVII; 09-05-2008 at 12:09 PM.
SBXVII is offline  
Old 09-05-2008, 12:09 PM   #158
T.O.Killa
The Starter
 
T.O.Killa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Berlin, MD
Posts: 2,061
Re: JC is not what I thought.

Quote:
Originally Posted by celts32 View Post
JC didn't lose this game. We got whipped on both lines of scrimmage.
We lost by nine points, if we got average qb play, we could have won.
T.O.Killa is offline  
Old 09-05-2008, 12:14 PM   #159
hesscl34
Registered User
 
hesscl34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Germantown, MD
Posts: 2,782
Re: JC is not what I thought.

Quote:
Originally Posted by cpayne5 View Post
So, with JC out from behind center, this team is a Super Bowl contender?
How did you come up with that? Did I say we would be Super Bowl bound if JC was gone? Nope, I didn't. But do I think we will win games if he's gone? ... YES! ..

I give him until game 5 for Zorn to make the call to bench him (if he continues to do poorly).
hesscl34 is offline  
Old 09-05-2008, 12:15 PM   #160
SBXVII
Franchise Player
 
SBXVII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
Re: JC is not what I thought.

Jason may have been bad but I have not been satisfied with our WR coach....Stan "the man" Hixon. Since we picked him up our WR couldn't shake a cold. I'm not sure what he's teaching them to do but it's not good enough.

I will say the picture of Cerrato in the press box bug eyed was priceless. Then rubbing his forehead. lol. The only thing I could think of was you made your bed now lie in it. lol.
SBXVII is offline  
Old 09-05-2008, 12:20 PM   #161
theJBexperience
Impact Rookie
 
theJBexperience's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Boone, NC
Posts: 579
Re: JC is not what I thought.

I think last night showed why Billy McMullen should've made the team. He has sure hands and always puts himself in a position to make a catch. He may not rack up the YAC, but he moves the chains.
theJBexperience is offline  
Old 09-05-2008, 12:21 PM   #162
jsarno
Franchise Player
 
jsarno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 31 Spooner St.
Age: 50
Posts: 9,534
Re: JC is not what I thought.

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
I think the numbers speak for themselves. Campbell got me 8.66 Yahoo fantasy points. Whereas Manning only had 8.27 points. So clearly Campbell is the better QB
This is how normal leagues would calculate it:
Manning 216 yards = 10 pts. 1 td = 6 pts. 1 int = -2 pts. Total = 14 points.
Campbell 133 yards = 6 pts. 1 td = 6 pts. Total = 12 points.

I do get your point...just wanted to point that out.

I was not impressed with Manning's performace overall. He looked VERY good in the first half, but looked terrible in the 2nd.
__________________
Zoltan is ZESTY! - courtesy of joeredskin
jsarno is offline  
Old 09-05-2008, 12:24 PM   #163
SUNRA
The Starter
 
SUNRA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,680
Re: JC is not what I thought.

Quote:
Originally Posted by T.O.Killa View Post
We lost by nine points, if we got average qb play, we could have won.
Very true. Campbell will not run the ball and he certainly doesn't make his reads. But Zorn is the blame for underutilizing Cooley, Betts and Sellers in the offense. Where in the hell was Fred Davis to help with pass protection?
__________________
Redskins Member since 1970
SUNRA is offline  
Old 09-05-2008, 12:28 PM   #164
jsarno
Franchise Player
 
jsarno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 31 Spooner St.
Age: 50
Posts: 9,534
Re: JC is not what I thought.

Quote:
Originally Posted by SUNRA View Post
Very true. Campbell will not run the ball and he certainly doesn't make his reads. But Zorn is the blame for underutilizing Cooley, Betts and Sellers in the offense. Where in the hell was Fred Davis to help with pass protection?
Not entirely accurate...sportscenter was analyzing the game, and Tim Hasslebeck just showed Cooley open with Campbell missing the fact that he was actually WIDE OPEN. Campbell is missing his reads. You can't blame all of this on Zorn.
__________________
Zoltan is ZESTY! - courtesy of joeredskin
jsarno is offline  
Old 09-05-2008, 12:32 PM   #165
mcarey032
Special Teams
 
mcarey032's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Arlington, VA.
Posts: 215
Re: JC is not what I thought.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Redskin Warrior View Post
........no turnovers, 1 sack against a great d-line, no help from the receivers I don't get how he was pathetic?
I agree. They don't want him to make a mistake instead everything is criticized for what he doesn't do. They need to back off a bit and let him figure things out. If anything, the playcalling was suspect. I guess that the coaches don't really trust Jason Campbell to run the offense and there is no reason not to. He should have been running a no hurry offense, down by 2 scores with under 8 to go in the 4th quarter. Instead he was told to huddle up and they executed to running plays? They needed to huddle to say run right? There should be some blame on Zorn here because there wasn't enough urgency with the pacing at the end. The line played substandard and the receivers dropping balls doesn't help matters much.
mcarey032 is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:08 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.41872 seconds with 12 queries