Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


JC is not what I thought.

Locker Room Main Forum


Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-04-2008, 10:59 PM   #16
Ruhskins
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,366
Re: JC is not what I thought.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Redskin Warrior View Post
........no turnovers, 1 sack against a great d-line, no help from the receivers I don't get how he was pathetic?
I'm not saying that JC had a perfect games, and Lord knows I was going insane when he was holding the ball in the first half. But he looked good in that TD drive (notice that Manning did not throw for a TD and with all the passing yard, he never put the game away). There were some opportunities in which the receivers were not open, receivers dropped the ball, and plays were negated by penalties (one catch that cooley had in the first half that was call back).

Besides, for every Sean Payton out there (rookie coach that succeeds) there are many rookie coaches that won't succeed in their first season. People say that Zorn inherited a playoff team, but this is a playoff team with issues that were not necessarily addressed in the offseason (i.e. WRs).

JC is not the QB that will make players around him better (unlike Payton Manning or Tom Brady) he needs good players around him, and right now our WRs group is the same as last year and are showing the same problems. The day that we replace our QB this year, is the day that we go into rebuilding mode. I don't think after 0-1 is that time to do it.
__________________
R.I.P. #21
Ruhskins is offline  

Advertisements
Old 09-04-2008, 10:59 PM   #17
WaldSkins
Playmaker
 
WaldSkins's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Harrisburg, PA
Age: 41
Posts: 2,726
Re: JC is not what I thought.

Quote:
Originally Posted by DynamiteRave View Post
Schneed will be around with his "Retarded Thread" very soon.



While I agree JC was pretty pathetic, I'm not ready to give up on him. It's a new offense, first week. Give him some more time.
I think if JC gets a new offense every year, then he will never get critized because its always his "first year in the system". Im pretty sure in the west coast or spread or gibbs or Al Saunders offensive system that if the first down is 7 yards away, you throw for 7 yards. Not 4 yards.


Ah lets give him some more time.
__________________
"I would change that around, Jesus isn't Cutler. I guarantee you Jesus couldnt thread the ball like Jay does."-Monksdown
WaldSkins is offline  
Old 09-04-2008, 11:01 PM   #18
Beemnseven
Pro Bowl
 
Beemnseven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 50
Posts: 5,311
Re: JC is not what I thought.

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsguy View Post
Jason's got a lot to learn with this offense. It's obvious. He still has to learn to get rid of the ball earlier. But ya know, Zorn also needs to learn to manage the game better as well. This year is going to be a learning process for both the coaches and the players. If you're expecting perfection right out of the gate, you're seriously mentally ill.
Every year there's a built-in excuse for this team.
Beemnseven is offline  
Old 09-04-2008, 11:03 PM   #19
WaldSkins
Playmaker
 
WaldSkins's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Harrisburg, PA
Age: 41
Posts: 2,726
Re: JC is not what I thought.

Quote:
Originally Posted by cpayne5 View Post
There's much more to it than the play of your QB. JC didn't look great tonight, but name me someone who did who wasn't returning kicks. JC gets a pass in my book until it becomes obvious that he is the weakest link.
Portis, Fletcher, Brooks.
__________________
"I would change that around, Jesus isn't Cutler. I guarantee you Jesus couldnt thread the ball like Jay does."-Monksdown
WaldSkins is offline  
Old 09-04-2008, 11:04 PM   #20
wilsowilso
Registered User
 
wilsowilso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Age: 51
Posts: 2,841
Re: JC is not what I thought.

Hey nobody can argue that great QB play in the NFL makes any team legit. I sure as hell want JC to be a bad ass, but I was so disgusted tonight because it seemed that JC was sitting on the shore of his country home chilling out with no care in the world. Thanks, but you are fired.
wilsowilso is offline  
Old 09-04-2008, 11:07 PM   #21
GusFrerotte
Registered User
 
GusFrerotte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Detroit area
Posts: 4,153
Re: JC is not what I thought.

We will see by mid season if JC is/will be a good QB in this league with the new offense. Thing is he has the same tendencies as last year even with a new look. I think by mid season for sure he will find a groove and excel. If not, the Start Brennan threads will be hot.
GusFrerotte is offline  
Old 09-04-2008, 11:08 PM   #22
hesscl34
Registered User
 
hesscl34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Germantown, MD
Posts: 2,782
Re: JC is not what I thought.

Quote:
Originally Posted by cpayne5 View Post
There's much more to it than the play of your QB. JC didn't look great tonight, but name me someone who did who wasn't returning kicks. JC gets a pass in my book until it becomes obvious that he is the weakest link.

QBs are leaders. They lead the team.. he doesn't do that, period. He's a wimp that has no confidence. UGH!!! ...
hesscl34 is offline  
Old 09-04-2008, 11:10 PM   #23
skinsguy
Pro Bowl
 
skinsguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,766
Re: JC is not what I thought.

The thing is fans, this is the first true game that counts for this offense and Jim Zorn. You go on the road to face the defending Super Bowl champions. Your team comes off of some pretty awful showings in its last couple preseason games. Your coach is a rookie. Your offense is brand new. You QB has to learn his third offense in his what, four years as a pro? What does common sense tell you? The odds were long against this team winning tonight. Still, that doesn't mean us as fans should throw in the towel? Not what I'm suggesting. But, if some of you are going to get on this forum board and start bitching and complaining and dissecting each and every little point of Jason Campbell, Jim Zorn, the Redskins franchise, and so forth and so on, then I honestly don't see why you're wasting your talents on doing so with a football team. Use that scrutiny toward solving the oil crisis in America, or solving the homeless problems, or balancing this country's budget. Heck, I'm sure some of you guys could probably be qualified to be President if you did so! But, as for the Redskins, just ride the ride, cheer the team on, and see where this season takes us. We have a long ways to go, but you have to start somewhere, and sorry if it's not possible for us to start off in glory to wind up in glory.
__________________
"Fire Up That Diesel!"
skinsguy is offline  
Old 09-04-2008, 11:11 PM   #24
skinsguy
Pro Bowl
 
skinsguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,766
Re: JC is not what I thought.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Beemnseven View Post
Every year there's a built-in excuse for this team.
And every year there's a bitch.
__________________
"Fire Up That Diesel!"
skinsguy is offline  
Old 09-04-2008, 11:13 PM   #25
wilsowilso
Registered User
 
wilsowilso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Age: 51
Posts: 2,841
Re: JC is not what I thought.

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsguy View Post
The thing is fans, this is the first true game that counts for this offense and Jim Zorn. You go on the road to face the defending Super Bowl champions. Your team comes off of some pretty awful showings in its last couple preseason games. Your coach is a rookie. Your offense is brand new. You QB has to learn his third offense in his what, four years as a pro? What does common sense tell you? The odds were long against this team winning tonight. Still, that doesn't mean us as fans should throw in the towel? Not what I'm suggesting. But, if some of you are going to get on this forum board and start bitching and complaining and dissecting each and every little point of Jason Campbell, Jim Zorn, the Redskins franchise, and so forth and so on, then I honestly don't see why you're wasting your talents on doing so with a football team. Use that scrutiny toward solving the oil crisis in America, or solving the homeless problems, or balancing this country's budget. Heck, I'm sure some of you guys could probably be qualified to be President if you did so! But, as for the Redskins, just ride the ride, cheer the team on, and see where this season takes us. We have a long ways to go, but you have to start somewhere, and sorry if it's not possible for us to start off in glory to wind up in glory.
No offense. You must be a Republican.
wilsowilso is offline  
Old 09-04-2008, 11:13 PM   #26
Twilbert07
Impact Rookie
 
Twilbert07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Age: 60
Posts: 594
Re: JC is not what I thought.

You're right: Jason Campbell is regressing. We have a major problem at QB. He looked lost out there and held the ball way too long.
Twilbert07 is offline  
Old 09-04-2008, 11:13 PM   #27
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,720
Re: JC is not what I thought.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Beemnseven View Post
Every year there's a built-in excuse for this team.
There are reasons for winning and reasons for losing. I don't know why we can't discuss things like that without getting slapped with the excuse label.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline  
Old 09-04-2008, 11:13 PM   #28
Redskin Warrior
The Starter
 
Redskin Warrior's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Montgomery, AL
Posts: 1,544
Re: JC is not what I thought.

Quote:
Originally Posted by DynamiteRave View Post
Campbell was 15/27 for 133 yards and 1 TD.

"The key to this game was third down efficiency. The Giants were sharp when it counted most, converting 7-of-14 for the game. On their four first-half scoring drives, they were even better, delivering on 5-of-8 third downs. On the flip side, the Giants' defense was just as dominant on third down, holding the Redskins to just three conversions in 13 attempts and forcing Campbell to throw short of the first-down marker repeatedly throughout the game"

"Jim Zorn made his coaching debut for the Redskins and showed his West Coast offense still has a ways to go. The Redskins had only 174 total yards and only 98 through the air. ..."

All this = Not good. Pathetic may be strong. But it was definitely bad.
I really respect that Rave and that was a flawless statement you made I don't disagree but we were right back where we were last year under Gibbs maybe worse. Cooley one catch, Thomas one catch, Randle El 7 & Moss 5 (mostly b.s. catches at the end). Now the three guys we drafted didn't contribute nothing but one catch right. When has Cooley been held to one catch ever? Now I know JC wasn't great or that good but explain to me where was his help offensive weapons were a no show or forced to block all game see Chris Cooley. But JC can't be totally blamed for this game. For you Colt Brennan lovers he wouldn't helped the receivers run betters routes or helped the o-line block better so cut the crap.
__________________
WIN, LOSE OR DRAW I'M A DIE-HARD REDSKIN FAN!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lotus View Post
First they ban winning...now this?
Redskin Warrior is offline  
Old 09-04-2008, 11:16 PM   #29
skinsguy
Pro Bowl
 
skinsguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,766
Re: JC is not what I thought.

Quote:
Originally Posted by wilsowilso View Post
No offense. You must be a Republican.
:confused: Not sure why you said that?
__________________
"Fire Up That Diesel!"
skinsguy is offline  
Old 09-04-2008, 11:17 PM   #30
Redskin Warrior
The Starter
 
Redskin Warrior's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Montgomery, AL
Posts: 1,544
Re: JC is not what I thought.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruhskins View Post
I'm not saying that JC had a perfect games, and Lord knows I was going insane when he was holding the ball in the first half. But he looked good in that TD drive (notice that Manning did not throw for a TD and with all the passing yard, he never put the game away). There were some opportunities in which the receivers were not open, receivers dropped the ball, and plays were negated by penalties (one catch that cooley had in the first half that was call back).

Besides, for every Sean Payton out there (rookie coach that succeeds) there are many rookie coaches that won't succeed in their first season. People say that Zorn inherited a playoff team, but this is a playoff team with issues that were not necessarily addressed in the offseason (i.e. WRs).

JC is not the QB that will make players around him better (unlike Payton Manning or Tom Brady) he needs good players around him, and right now our WRs group is the same as last year and are showing the same problems. The day that we replace our QB this year, is the day that we go into rebuilding mode. I don't think after 0-1 is that time to do it.
This is what I've been asking who was open while he was holding on to the ball? Nobody!!!! Did y'all want him to throw a pick?
__________________
WIN, LOSE OR DRAW I'M A DIE-HARD REDSKIN FAN!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lotus View Post
First they ban winning...now this?
Redskin Warrior is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.87913 seconds with 12 queries