![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
| View Poll Results: Do you approve of the trade for Jason Taylor? | |||
| Yes |
|
195 | 91.98% |
| No |
|
17 | 8.02% |
| Voters: 212. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,994
|
Re: Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)
Quote:
When your highest tenured team leader put's positioning his post-football career over his teams improvement, it just sends the wrong message. When your team is 1-15, those "voluntary" OTA's take on more meaning than if the team was 11-5. Again, I believe to a certain degree that both parties share blame in the fall-out in Miami. 1.) Parcells needs to relax his sphincter a bit 2.) For Taylor, there are better times to pursue off-seeason commitments outside of football then when your team is 1-15. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
\m/
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,849
|
Re: Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)
Quote:
I have a feeling that regardless of what JT did, Parcells was going to look to push him out. Dancing with the stars was a very convenient excuse. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,575
|
Re: Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)
Everyone knows they are called voluntary but in reality you gotta be there. I do agree that Parcells had it in for JT and the dancing stuff made a good excuse.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
A Dude
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Newtown Square, PA
Age: 46
Posts: 12,458
|
Re: Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)
Jason Taylor was not the problem with Miami, he was not responsible for turning their ship around. Hell, he was one of the only players who played well last season.
__________________
God made certain people to play football. He was one of them. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|