Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Why Doesn't "Gibbs' Football" Work for the Redskins?

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-29-2007, 07:28 PM   #1
MTRedskinsFan
Registered User
 
MTRedskinsFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 359
Re: Why Doesn't "Gibbs' Football" Work for the Redskins?

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsguy View Post
How are they predicting our offensive game plans so well? Are we not 2-1 right now? If teams predict our game plan so well, we'd be 0-3. Right now, it is our players' execution that isn't running the score board up, not that opposing defenses are stopping us. Most of the time, we're stopping ourselves.
You're right yo, execution is huge problem. How can Moss and Portis drop passes on the numbers, or Betts run w/o a head of steam? But I still take back to coaching/playcalling. Thrash has best hands on the team, so when Moss is dropping shit left and right why don't we at least pick up a few yards w/ Thrash. Maybe it's not a matter of predictability but Gibbs and maybe Saunders reactingly too slowly to what's happening on the field.
MTRedskinsFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2007, 10:05 AM   #2
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
Re: Why Doesn't "Gibbs' Football" Work for the Redskins?

Quote:
Originally Posted by MTRedskinsFan View Post
You're right yo, execution is huge problem. How can Moss and Portis drop passes on the numbers, or Betts run w/o a head of steam? But I still take back to coaching/playcalling. Thrash has best hands on the team, so when Moss is dropping shit left and right why don't we at least pick up a few yards w/ Thrash. Maybe it's not a matter of predictability but Gibbs and maybe Saunders reactingly too slowly to what's happening on the field.
You do bring up good points, but I think there is one thing I should be clear on. Just because there is a theoretically better option can NOT mean the playcalling was wrong. In the NFL, you can't just replace the playcall, you must change the playcaller, and generally the entire offense with it. With playcalling such a fraction of a percent of the reason for any given outcome of a game, I don't think we can seperate a few plays from the rest of the game.

I say it's pointless to debate over playcalling, even if your right in the instances you bring up (I believe you are) because it's one of the nitpickiest things you can do. If a coach is helping his team instead of hurting it, like I believe Gibbs' staff is, we can live with the mistakes.

Everyone makes them. I believe Andy Reid is the best active coach, but he made a mistake that cost him 4 points against us. But I know over the course of the season, he will atone for that.

It's a long season, a few plays against the Giants in September will not matter.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:18 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.16789 seconds with 11 queries