Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Redskins sign guard Rick DeMulling

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-20-2007, 01:27 AM   #16
stbabyy
Registered User
 
stbabyy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Newport News, VA
Posts: 38
Re: Redskins sign guard Rick DeMulling

Fabini isn't bad he had those penalties at the end of the 2nd half but other than that he did well! I'd say keep Fabini in unless he proves himself better to the coaches.
stbabyy is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 09-20-2007, 02:44 AM   #17
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
Re: Redskins sign guard Rick DeMulling

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72 View Post
I think he will start soon, probably after the bye.

Fabini is good for depth but he's not starting material anymore.

DeMulling is athletic and moves well. Buges will get him coached up.
Makes you wonder why we went after Fabini in the first place, and not Demulling or Vincent.

I think Demulling can be a pretty good Guard in this league. It's hard to get a read on him since he hasn't done anything since 2004 though.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2007, 09:51 AM   #18
skinsfan_nn
Playmaker
 
skinsfan_nn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Newport News,Virginia
Age: 61
Posts: 4,495
Re: Redskins sign guard Rick DeMulling

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72 View Post
I think he will start soon, probably after the bye.

Fabini is good for depth but he's not starting material anymore.

DeMulling is athletic and moves well. Buges will get him coached up.
I don't know about that fabini has done fine. We'll have to see how this kid learns the system, either way he should be ok depth.
__________________
"There's no greater feeling than moving a man from Point A to Point B, against his will." #68

THANKS COACH GIBBS FOR EVERYTHING! YOUR THE MAN AND ALWAYS WILL BE!
skinsfan_nn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2007, 10:20 AM   #19
Ade Jimoh Fan Club
Special Teams
 
Ade Jimoh Fan Club's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 410
Re: Redskins sign guard Rick DeMulling

This joker was cut from a HORRIBLE lions O-Line, where he was a BACK-UP. That's bad, folks.

He was picked up by Indy in the offseason because he used to be there and knew the offense. Then Indy lost some key linemen to injuries AND THEY STILL CUT HIM.

Then he was picked up by the Patriots, who we all know are horrible talent scouts (sarcasm) and they DROPPED HIM like Carlos Rogers trying to make an interception.

THERE'S GOT TO BE A BETTER OPTION... I'm not sure this is an upgrade over False Start Fabini.

What about Heyer? I know he's primarily a tackle - but he's shown promise - can he be converted to a guard? What about Pucillo? Or Lefotu? Or THE ADE?
Ade Jimoh Fan Club is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2007, 10:25 AM   #20
SC Skins Fan
The Starter
 
SC Skins Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 1,555
Re: Redskins sign guard Rick DeMulling

We'll see. The coaches watched the tape of the guy, I doubt many of us have broken down film of Rick DeMulling. I know JLC was all over Keydrick Vincent's jock, but I don't know anything about that dude either. You've got to believe that there were reasons that both guys were available so we'll just have to see. Not really knowing anything I'd assume they liked DeMulling's movement skills as others have mentioned and just looking at Vincent's 330 frame I'm assuming (but don't really know) he doesn't move as well. If nothing else I guess DeMulling provides depth at both guard positions, but like others I assume he'll be in the lineup against Detroit week 5.
__________________
It has taken a long time, but I have finally realized that nothing I say about the Redskins will have any effect upon anything the Redskins do.
SC Skins Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2007, 11:13 AM   #21
12thMan
MVP
 
12thMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,460
Re: Redskins sign guard Rick DeMulling

I agree with 70, starting guards don't grow on trees. And at the age of 30, there's only so much "coaching up" Buges can do with this guy. He may be a keeper and he may be good for depth. At any rate, I wouldn't expect him to start anytime soon. But to suggest he's better than the guys we have based on a scouting report doesn't mean much to me.

Oh yeah, we didn't forget about Mike Pucillo did we? He's still very much in the mix.
12thMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2007, 11:27 AM   #22
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 99,913
Re: Redskins sign guard Rick DeMulling

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
Makes you wonder why we went after Fabini in the first place, and not Demulling or Vincent.

I think Demulling can be a pretty good Guard in this league. It's hard to get a read on him since he hasn't done anything since 2004 though.
I think Fabini was mainly looked at as depth at the tackle spot.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2007, 11:57 AM   #23
TheMalcolmConnection
I like big (_|_)s.
 
TheMalcolmConnection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia
Age: 44
Posts: 19,264
Re: Redskins sign guard Rick DeMulling

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ade Jimoh Fan Club View Post
This joker was cut from a HORRIBLE lions O-Line, where he was a BACK-UP. That's bad, folks.

He was picked up by Indy in the offseason because he used to be there and knew the offense. Then Indy lost some key linemen to injuries AND THEY STILL CUT HIM.

Then he was picked up by the Patriots, who we all know are horrible talent scouts (sarcasm) and they DROPPED HIM like Carlos Rogers trying to make an interception.

THERE'S GOT TO BE A BETTER OPTION... I'm not sure this is an upgrade over False Start Fabini.

What about Heyer? I know he's primarily a tackle - but he's shown promise - can he be converted to a guard? What about Pucillo? Or Lefotu? Or THE ADE?
Also remember this: so was Wade.
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted.
TheMalcolmConnection is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2007, 11:59 AM   #24
The Zimmermans
Impact Rookie
 
The Zimmermans's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Woodley Park, Washington DC
Age: 41
Posts: 937
Re: Redskins sign guard Rick DeMulling

isnt it funny how the one guy that was injured and didnt play during preseason is the only one healthy right now? samuels
__________________
Dan Snyder is a Cancer, Joe Gibbs is the Cure
The Zimmermans is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2007, 01:32 PM   #25
jbcjr14
The Starter
 
jbcjr14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Austin, Texas
Age: 55
Posts: 2,015
Re: Redskins sign guard Rick DeMulling

Quote:
Originally Posted by 12thMan View Post
I agree with 70, starting guards don't grow on trees. And at the age of 30, there's only so much "coaching up" Buges can do with this guy. He may be a keeper and he may be good for depth. At any rate, I wouldn't expect him to start anytime soon. But to suggest he's better than the guys we have based on a scouting report doesn't mean much to me.

Oh yeah, we didn't forget about Mike Pucillo did we? He's still very much in the mix.
Don't forget it was Pucillo that took out two Eagle defenders with a GREAT block on the Portis TD run. I am not sure he is the answer for an every down guard, but he has been playing alot of TE on the line in short yardage situations.
__________________
"Work Harder: millions on welfare are counting on you" - Obama 2009 address to Congress.
jbcjr14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2007, 03:10 PM   #26
JWsleep
Propane and propane accessories
 
JWsleep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Age: 56
Posts: 4,719
Re: Redskins sign guard Rick DeMulling

Rabach is healthy too.

Look, this guy obviously isn't great--that's why he's available. But he's a fill-in, and hopefully, he'll fit in with the guys we have. Whether or not he starts really depends on Fabini's play--it's his to loose, I would guess. We'll see.
__________________
Hail from Houston!
JWsleep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2007, 03:31 PM   #27
Longtimefan
Playmaker
 
Longtimefan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Germantown, Md.
Posts: 4,832
Re: Redskins sign guard Rick DeMulling

I view this as a depth signing, no more, no less. I don't think it's likely he'll be starting anytime soon (if at all) unless Fabini demonstrates he cannot maintain the position. I can't imagine there's a starting caliber guard on the street anywhere at this point, there's a reason he's available, and it's not a good one.
__________________
A revolution is coming and it will be televised.
Longtimefan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2007, 04:19 PM   #28
Dirtbag59
Naega jeil jal naga
 
Dirtbag59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 40
Posts: 14,750
Re: Redskins sign guard Rick DeMulling

Heres why I think they choose DeMulling over Vincent:

- Randy Thomas is used on a lot of pulls and traps in our offensive system.

Kendryick Vincent Scouting Report
"He is a short area player who isn't very effective pulling or getting out on the edges. He is an ordinary athlete who bends too much at the waist and is slow to recover when beaten. Vincent isn't particularly agile and can get caught leaning."

Rick DeMulling Scouting Report
"He brings athleticism to the offensive line and seems to be a good fit at guard for the Lions' offense, which includes both pulling and trapping in the schemes. He is a solid technician and a knee-bender who plays with good body position and leverage. DeMulling excels when given the opportunity to block in space. He tracks defenders well and is able to get in position to make the block on the outside or on the second level."

Seems that DeMulling was better suited for Randy's spot. I bet if they were looking for a free agent Left Guard they would have signed Vincent, since he's more of a mauler as opposed to DeMulling who seems to be more of a finesse player.
Dirtbag59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2007, 07:31 PM   #29
WillH
The Starter
 
WillH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,592
Re: Redskins sign guard Rick DeMulling

Coach's Corner: Joe Bugel

Joe Bugel: "We have a total of seven linemen on the roster, with two more on the practice squad. So we brought in Rick DeMulling in here to give us some quality depth."

"Todd and Jason bring a lot of experience, so we'll be all right there. Jason has played on the right side before. He started at right tackle for eight years with the Jets, so it's not too big for him. He is still learning the nuances of the guard position, but he'll be okay."

Sounds like Fabini is gonna be starter...and Demulling is just depth

But I guess it still all depends on performance
WillH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2007, 07:43 PM   #30
RedskinPete
The Starter
 
RedskinPete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Camino,Ca
Posts: 1,174
Re: Redskins sign guard Rick DeMulling

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirtbag359 View Post
Heres why I think they choose DeMulling over Vincent:

- Randy Thomas is used on a lot of pulls and traps in our offensive system.

Kendryick Vincent Scouting Report
"He is a short area player who isn't very effective pulling or getting out on the edges. He is an ordinary athlete who bends too much at the waist and is slow to recover when beaten. Vincent isn't particularly agile and can get caught leaning."

Rick DeMulling Scouting Report
"He brings athleticism to the offensive line and seems to be a good fit at guard for the Lions' offense, which includes both pulling and trapping in the schemes. He is a solid technician and a knee-bender who plays with good body position and leverage. DeMulling excels when given the opportunity to block in space. He tracks defenders well and is able to get in position to make the block on the outside or on the second level."

Seems that DeMulling was better suited for Randy's spot. I bet if they were looking for a free agent Left Guard they would have signed Vincent, since he's more of a mauler as opposed to DeMulling who seems to be more of a finesse player.
Nice post.....DeMulling sounds more and more like what we may need now and later if he needs to started. Still I would have like both and this is why. We have O lineman droping like flyes and I am sure Vincent will not be around later. Also the odds are better one of the two will work out. But I know there is only so many roster spots and money.
RedskinPete is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:21 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 3.38684 seconds with 12 queries