Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Off-Topic Discussion > Parking Lot

Parking Lot Off-topic chatter pertaining to movies, TV, music, video games, etc.


New Playbook

Parking Lot


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-15-2004, 11:31 AM   #1
beg8878
Special Teams
 
beg8878's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: New Jersey
Age: 46
Posts: 270
New Playbook

anyone have a suggestion on a team that has a real solid playbook? I play with the Skins one but am looking to change it up a bit
beg8878 is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 08-15-2004, 06:22 PM   #2
That Guy
Living Legend
 
That Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,553
pats, but its not a very exciting playbook maybe chiefs offensive plays and baltimores defensive ones...
That Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2004, 10:45 AM   #3
Phinehas
Special Teams
 
Phinehas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 106
IMHO, it's much more fun to create your own plays. You can also take plays that aren't quite what you want and make little changes to them to make them better. My only complaint about the play editor, though, is that I haven't been able to figure out how to create a Play Action passing play from scratch. If you want PA, you have to modify a PA play.

--Phin
Phinehas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2004, 11:09 AM   #4
illdefined
Playmaker
 
illdefined's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: nyc
Age: 48
Posts: 2,631
cant stand getting last years playbook..Gibbs doesn't warrant his own??
illdefined is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2004, 05:06 PM   #5
That Guy
Living Legend
 
That Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,553
gibbs needs his own position too... last i checked madden didnt do H-backs...
That Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2004, 05:54 PM   #6
Redskins_P
Fight for old DC!
 
Redskins_P's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Aldie, VA
Age: 46
Posts: 4,101
ESPN 2k5 has a great playbook for the skins. It has about 7 different types of "single-back" formations, and the counter is almost identical to the one Gibbs runs. Thats where I was dissapointed the most on Madden. You would think that Madden is a step ahead of ESPN when it comes to that.
Redskins_P is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2004, 08:41 PM   #7
illdefined
Playmaker
 
illdefined's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: nyc
Age: 48
Posts: 2,631
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redskins_P
ESPN 2k5 has a great playbook for the skins. It has about 7 different types of "single-back" formations, and the counter is almost identical to the one Gibbs runs. Thats where I was dissapointed the most on Madden. You would think that Madden is a step ahead of ESPN when it comes to that.
first thing i noticed. counter-treys from every formation. lots of play action too. someone did their homework..
illdefined is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2004, 09:58 PM   #8
That Guy
Living Legend
 
That Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,553
if the player stats were half as awesome as madden it'd be a definite lock for me
That Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2004, 06:03 PM   #9
BossHog
Registered User
 
BossHog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Norfolk, Va
Posts: 665
West Coast.
BossHog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2005, 03:56 AM   #10
bertoskins
Special Teams
 
bertoskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: philippines
Age: 51
Posts: 184
try titans and vikings playbook
esp singleback normal wr option
bertoskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.20542 seconds with 12 queries