Negative media coverage of the Redskins

[BDBohnzie]

Snyder sold his company when he bought the Redskins (or so I thought)...what would his former company have to do with his relationship with the current media?

like it was stated before, until the Skins start having winning seasons, the media will be all over him. he's trying to be a Steinbrenner/Jones type owner, yet has been unsuccessful to this point.

i wouldn't put a second thought into "Speaking Gibberish"...someone on the espn.com writing team was trying to be clever...nothing more.

reading the O-Line article, it points out all the faults from last year, which anyone with half a brain could see that they had no guidance or vision. Third from last paragraph states, "Arguably one of the finest line mentors in the recent history of the game, Bugel came to know the Washington personnel during his consulting stint, and he has put some of that knowledge into action. More important, he has restored order, implemented ideas that are steeped in fundamentals and brought sanity and soundness to the dazed unit."

Typical Pastabelly...wait until the end to declare the Skins have done something correct, and surround it with past faults.

The Skins have been someone's NFC East pick ever since Snyder took over, and it has not panned out yet. Credit that to why the media doesn't think much of the Skins.

The other article about Brunell, and Pastabelly's 5 course meal, i mean 5 observations, are just that...observations...you can't trust him as far as you can throw him, and Don Vito, I mean Pastabelly is too big to be lifting.