![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#31 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: ZOMGZZZ!!111
Age: 33
Posts: 1,160
|
Re: Does ?Rock's new deal mean no Nemo?
i give him credit and i like rock a lot on special teams, but we also must not lose sight that the rams run defense sucks balls.
i know it seems like im diminishing his accomplishment, but i just want to keep us grounded glad we resigned him though1
__________________
143 lbs of twisted steel and sex appeal. |
|
|
|
| Advertisements |
|
|
#32 | |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 102
|
Re: Does ?Rock's new deal mean no Nemo?
Quote:
Anyone notice that LaVar was not on Lennie's list of top 50 UFAs? He may not get any good offers.... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fairfax, VA
Age: 49
Posts: 4,261
|
Re: Does ?Rock's new deal mean no Nemo?
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fairfax, VA
Age: 49
Posts: 4,261
|
Re: Does ?Rock's new deal mean no Nemo?
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 43
Posts: 17,620
|
Re: Does ?Rock's new deal mean no Nemo?
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Another Year, another mess.
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,581
|
Re: Does ?Rock's new deal mean no Nemo?
Rock was originally a fullback and al saunders uses that position in his schemes so maybe they had a place for him
__________________
That got ugly fast |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|