Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


11/4 Trade deadline: Buyers, Sellers or not involved?

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-02-2025, 10:41 PM   #1
NC_Skins
Gamebreaker
 
NC_Skins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 14,655
Re: 11/4 Trade deadline: Buyers, Sellers or not involved?

Quote:
Originally Posted by AnonEmouse View Post
The other mistake was not better addressing WR in FA (even the draft?). Brown was a risk hanging #3 WR on, McCaffrey is looking solid as a #2/3, but was still something of an unknown, and Lane is probably going to work out well eventually, but may never be better than #3. We needed a player to push and complement Deebo and Scary.
Will you fucking mother fuckers stop with this shit. It's about the dumbest fucking take one can have. They drafted a WR, they traded and got Deebo while having Terry on the roster. That's plenty. You can't have 109873497349734972439762 WRs just in case of injuries. If Higgins/Chase went down right now on the Bengals, you think their fans would be screaming about how they did nothing to address WR? Yeah, it would be a STUPID fucking thought.

Defense. I want you to repeat this fucking word 1,000 times and that's the ONLY thing that should be talked about from now until the draft. You can't always account for injuries, you can account for shitty talent.
__________________
"So let me get this straight. We have the event of the year on TV with millions watching around the world... and people want a punt, pass, and kick competition to be the halftime entertainment?? Folks, don't quit your day jobs."- Matty
NC_Skins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2025, 12:52 AM   #2
kct1975
The Starter
 
kct1975's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 2,387
Re: 11/4 Trade deadline: Buyers, Sellers or not involved?

Quote:
Originally Posted by NC_Skins View Post
KCT1975 is a fucking mother fucking piece of shit. KCT1975 is about the dumbest fucking person on the planet!
Yes Yes I Am!
Thank You pointing that Out!
__________________
KCT - "No Matter Where You Go, There You Are!"
kct1975 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2025, 06:05 AM   #3
AnonEmouse
Playmaker
 
AnonEmouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: UK
Age: 59
Posts: 2,714
Re: 11/4 Trade deadline: Buyers, Sellers or not involved?

Quote:
Originally Posted by NC_Skins View Post
Will you fucking mother fuckers stop with this shit. It's about the dumbest fucking take one can have. They drafted a WR, they traded and got Deebo while having Terry on the roster. That's plenty. You can't have 109873497349734972439762 WRs just in case of injuries. If Higgins/Chase went down right now on the Bengals, you think their fans would be screaming about how they did nothing to address WR? Yeah, it would be a STUPID fucking thought.

Defense. I want you to repeat this fucking word 1,000 times and that's the ONLY thing that should be talked about from now until the draft. You can't always account for injuries, you can account for shitty talent.
I'll excuse the abuse, given the current situation, but you're not reading what I wrote. I'm not talking about taking anything from addressing the D, they needed to address multiple areas of the team. I'm talking about going into he offseason with the view that Brown was our #3 WR and sticking with that. He's not been available, especially a lot of last year. We're now effectively signing guys off the street not to refill the WR room, but to play at #2 and #3. Having a dependable #3, especially as they didn't know where negotiation's with Scary would end up, was essential and AP dropped the ball (pun intended).

Yes D is P1, P2 and P3 because it wasn't addressed last year. But JD5 needs guys to throw to (and to be on the field himself). And if Sinnott isn't what they hoped he'd be, we need a pass catching TE too. if we rebuild the D and leave the O as is, we're no better off. It all needs looking at.
AnonEmouse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2025, 07:27 AM   #4
Chico23231
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
Chico23231's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 35,118
Re: 11/4 Trade deadline: Buyers, Sellers or not involved?

Quote:
Originally Posted by AnonEmouse View Post
I'll excuse the abuse, given the current situation, but you're not reading what I wrote. I'm not talking about taking anything from addressing the D, they needed to address multiple areas of the team. I'm talking about going into he offseason with the view that Brown was our #3 WR and sticking with that. He's not been available, especially a lot of last year. We're now effectively signing guys off the street not to refill the WR room, but to play at #2 and #3. Having a dependable #3, especially as they didn't know where negotiation's with Scary would end up, was essential and AP dropped the ball (pun intended).

Yes D is P1, P2 and P3 because it wasn't addressed last year. But JD5 needs guys to throw to (and to be on the field himself). And if Sinnott isn't what they hoped he'd be, we need a pass catching TE too. if we rebuild the D and leave the O as is, we're no better off. It all needs looking at.
I agree

Sinnot, McCaffery and Lane have been bad as receivers. That’s on Peters and Coaching.
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler

He Gets Us
Chico23231 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2025, 08:27 AM   #5
punch it in
From a Land Down Under
 
punch it in's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: toms river, nj
Age: 54
Posts: 24,279
Re: 11/4 Trade deadline: Buyers, Sellers or not involved?

Quote:
Originally Posted by AnonEmouse View Post
I'll excuse the abuse, given the current situation, but you're not reading what I wrote. I'm not talking about taking anything from addressing the D, they needed to address multiple areas of the team. I'm talking about going into he offseason with the view that Brown was our #3 WR and sticking with that. He's not been available, especially a lot of last year. We're now effectively signing guys off the street not to refill the WR room, but to play at #2 and #3. Having a dependable #3, especially as they didn't know where negotiation's with Scary would end up, was essential and AP dropped the ball (pun intended).

Yes D is P1, P2 and P3 because it wasn't addressed last year. But JD5 needs guys to throw to (and to be on the field himself). And if Sinnott isn't what they hoped he'd be, we need a pass catching TE too. if we rebuild the D and leave the O as is, we're no better off. It all needs looking at.

punch it in is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 1.41341 seconds with 11 queries