Home Stadium Convo

[That Guy]

Originally Posted by GridIron26

I see your point now, although I don't think it is that simple as you are making it to be. I personally hate the idea of NFL owners using tax funds to cover stadium costs, and I was surprised by this arrangement between Harris and DC as I see it differently. The infrastructure around the stadium would still happen if there is no stadium - of course, the designs would have been different if there is no stadium but infrastructure improvements still have to happen anyway. Not only the improvements are needed, it would create better traffic control and jobs for people near the stadium. Yes, Harris benefits this indirectly but taxpayers also benefit from Harris' investment into the stadium. So to me, it's win-win situation except for those taxpayers who don't like football.

I mean, sort of. The amount of infra needed BECAUSE of the massive stadium (water, streets, sewage, etc), the price is WAAAAY higher than if they left the area a bit dumpy. It is a win-win, because the taxes SHOULD pay it back with interest/cover the increased maintenance (depending on the details).

I can't see how having a new stadium + retail + housing (more people) is going to make DC traffic any better.

[GridIron26]

Originally Posted by That Guy

I can't see how having a new stadium + retail + housing (more people) is going to make DC traffic any better.

Yeah, the traffic will never get better. I mean in terms of directing traffic around the area. I really hate 1 way streets.