Dr. Z explains why Skins will go 4-12 (sort of)

wolfeskins · 09-05-2005, 08:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by D'BOYZ

So for you wath you say every other team in the league has an excuse to WHY they aren't better then Washinghton it doesn matter who you faced it doesn't matter how good the other team was or bad it doesn matter how predictible your offense was so teams played different with you that they do the colts but . Hey if saying you had the 3rd best defenses just because gets you trough the night and helps you justify a 6 -10 season man go for it.

As I said all along it was a very good D but not the third best.

and once again your grammer was terrible and hard to read but i persavailed.

what i and every one else are trying to tell you is no matter how much crap you or anyone else let spill from your lips , the bottom line is the redskins defense was the 3rd best in the nfl and 1st in the nfc.

That Guy · 09-05-2005, 08:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by D'BOYZ

ok man basing on your points Jacksonville was the 29th best scoring offense or 2 spots above yours baltimore was 20th those ain't good offenses. Now you say you lost the moyority of your games for less then 7 point.

Lets see of 10 games you lost 7 where for 7 points or less, those games where NYG,DAL,CLE,BAL, CIN,PHI and DAL. if we compare the other teams Bal was 4 out 7 Buff 4 out 7 NYJ 4 out 6. the other lost so few game they aren't worth putting here. And based on your analysis hey Detroit lost 6 out the 10 for 7 or less points so that makes them based on that analysis a top 10 or top 5 Def I mean the lost 6 close games.

And of those 7 loses your team had for less than 7 points only 2 PHI and CIN where top 15 offense and only 2 BAL and PHI had winning record and 1 had .500 CIN the rest where bad offenses and buttom feeders in the league AND YES I'M SAYING DALLAS WAS A BOTTOM FEEDER.

So in conclusion in YOUR point of view Washington was the Third Best defense because it lost 7 games to close margins 4 of those games that they lost with this close margin where vs teams with the same or WORST record I Don't get it if your D was so good and it played vs this crapy team why could't you beat them.

They all had bad offense they had a WORST DEF according to your knowledge why couldn't you beet them but hey a least the game was close.

Man again total yard avergae doesn't say how good your D really was the weren't really challenged and they lost games to teams with same or worst records bad offenses and worst defenses.

wow, you totally missed my point... entirely.. I was saying that no NFL team decides that "this week we're only going to score 7 points, cause thats all we need"... which was in response to your jackassery about how teams somehow decided that they didn't want to score on us and how that was the reason we had a good defense.

Please, if you can't understand what I'm saying, don't post an essay in response to some random arguement you made up... I was also saying that our offense kept our D on the field longer than some of the other teams you mentioned.. notice i said SOME, and I wasn't talking about total yards, i was talking about time of possession. New england, the jets, and pittsburg all have their defenses on the field less than we did... thats all i was saying, i don't know what that rant about offensive rankings and baltimore was in response to, but it doesn't apply to anything I said.

Please stop trolling.

D'BOYZ · 09-05-2005, 08:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by That Guy

wow, you totally missed my point... entirely.. I was saying that no NFL team decides that "this week we're only going to score 7 points, cause thats all we need"... which was in response to your jackassery about how teams somehow decided that they didn't want to score on us and how that was the reason we had a good defense.

Please, if you can't understand what I'm saying, don't post an essay in response to some random arguement you made up... I was also saying that our offense kept our D on the field longer than some of the other teams you mentioned.. notice i said SOME, and I wasn't talking about total yards, i was talking about time of possession. New england, the jets, and pittsburg all have their defenses on the field less than we did... thats all i was saying, i don't know what that rant about offensive rankings and baltimore was in response to, but it doesn't apply to anything I said.

Please stop trolling.

Ok man the point about offense came about you argument that those team had Offense that helped their D I pointed that 2 also had a bad Offense and the second point came of your argument that "And most of our games were 3-7 points difference, meaning that other teams didn't exactly get the type of lead where they could be comfortable"

So I pointed with whom you lost in a close margin saying those teams weren't that good.

About time of posesion I'm tired will analize it another day if you need that stat also lol

MTK · 01-03-2006, 05:02 PM

Just thought it would be fun to re-visit this thread, 4-12!! LOL

TheMalcolmConnection · 01-03-2006, 05:07 PM

Damn. They were close.

steveo395 · 01-03-2006, 05:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheMalcolmConnection

Damn. They were close.

eh, only 6 games off...close enough

and yet he will still keep his job even though he was so wrong about so many teams

ST21 · 01-03-2006, 07:12 PM

opinions or like assholes..........seems everyone has one

skindogger47 · 01-03-2006, 08:28 PM

Sports Illustrated writers are like assholes. . . . wait, no they are assholes.

GoSkins! · 01-03-2006, 10:39 PM

NFL Experts = Say what everyone else says.

dblanch66 · 01-04-2006, 01:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by steveo395

eh, only 6 games off...close enough

and yet he will still keep his job even though he was so wrong about so many teams

Exactly. If any of us had that kind of failure rate at our jobs, we'd all be fired. Dr. Zit is a ****ing jack weed.

Hog1 · 01-04-2006, 06:34 AM

All those real tall buildings in Las Vegas were built with the money fleeced from people winning 25% of the time (like Dr. Dumbass). I guess 1 out of 4...............isn't so good?

12thMan · 01-04-2006, 09:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12thMan

Honestly, I think 10 wins is doable. We were the best 6-10 team in football last year, which could have very, very easily been 9-7, IMO. And this year we have made, IMO, significant improvements on the offense.

I hate to quote myself....but Dr. Z is making me and most of you look like prophets

I also find it interesting how, in this thread, DBoyz constantly questioned our drafting of Jason Campbell and our defensive rankings from last season. Well with the signing of Gregg Williams and the possible departure of the "oh so loyal" Bill Parcels, it's the Cowboys who will have a lot of questions to answer this off-season.

Hail Skins!!

01-03-2006, 05:02 PM	#79
MTK \m/ Join Date: Feb 2004 Age: 53 Posts: 99,913	Re: Dr. Z explains why Skins will go 4-12 (sort of) Just thought it would be fun to re-visit this thread, 4-12!! LOL __________________ Support The Warpath! \| Warpath Shop

01-03-2006, 05:07 PM	#80
TheMalcolmConnection I like big (_\|_)s. Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Charlottesville, Virginia Age: 44 Posts: 19,264	Re: Dr. Z explains why Skins will go 4-12 (sort of) Damn. They were close. __________________ Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted.

01-03-2006, 07:12 PM	#82
ST21 Impact Rookie Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Texas Posts: 519	Re: Dr. Z explains why Skins will go 4-12 (sort of) opinions or like assholes..........seems everyone has one __________________ SAY HELLO TO THE BAD GUY........

01-03-2006, 08:28 PM	#83
skindogger47 Special Teams Join Date: Aug 2005 Age: 44 Posts: 262	Re: Dr. Z explains why Skins will go 4-12 (sort of) Sports Illustrated writers are like assholes. . . . wait, no they are assholes.

01-03-2006, 10:39 PM	#84
GoSkins! The Starter Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Yorktown, Va Age: 56 Posts: 1,587	Re: Dr. Z explains why Skins will go 4-12 (sort of) NFL Experts = Say what everyone else says. __________________ Not everything that counts can be counted, and not everything that can be counted counts. A. Einstien

01-04-2006, 06:34 AM	#86
Hog1 Quietly Dominating the East Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Naples, Florida Posts: 10,675	Re: Dr. Z explains why Skins will go 4-12 (sort of) All those real tall buildings in Las Vegas were built with the money fleeced from people winning 25% of the time (like Dr. Dumbass). I guess 1 out of 4...............isn't so good? __________________ Goodbye Sean..........Vaya Con Dios thankyou Joe....... *“God made certain people to play football. He was one of them.” – Joe Gibbs*

Dr. Z explains why Skins will go 4-12 (sort of)

Locker Room Main Forum