The hypocrisy of the ________

[CRedskinsRule]

Originally Posted by mooby

Did the FBI interview Ford or Kavanaugh?

Both were questioned publicly by the judiciary committee, and provided a full written testimony. Are you suggesting that Dr. Ford withheld important details from the Judiciary Committee? That would not bode well for her credibility would it?

Again the hypocrisy of the left is far more on display, the fbi could most certainly have chosen to interview Kavanaugh or Ford if they felt they needed additional information, or if additional information prompted additional questions, but since the left doesnt like the result they scream the fbi was bad, even they have spent the last 2 years saying how thorough independent and professional the fbi under Christopher wray is.

[mooby]

Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule

Both were questioned publicly by the judiciary committee, and provided a full written testimony. Are you suggesting that Dr. Ford withheld important details from the Judiciary Committee? That would not bode well for her credibility would it?

Again the hypocrisy of the left is far more on display, the fbi could most certainly have chosen to interview Kavanaugh or Ford if they felt they needed additional information, or if additional information prompted additional questions, but since the left doesnt like the result they scream the fbi was bad, even they have spent the last 2 years saying how thorough independent and professional the fbi under Christopher wray is.

U right, Senate Judiciary Committee is just as qualified to investigate potential criminal matters as the FBI.

Is it true the FBI had to get permission from the WH as to who they could interview? Idk, but this liberal rag called the Washington Examiner certainly seems to think so.

[CRedskinsRule]

Originally Posted by mooby

U right, Senate Judiciary Committee is just as qualified to investigate potential criminal matters as the FBI.

Is it true the FBI had to get permission from the WH as to who they could interview? Idk, but this liberal rag called the Washington Examiner certainly seems to think so.

Again, its the left who wanted an fbi investigation and now cries after the fbi (which is no friend of this white house and would leak a turnip if they thought it hurts trump) found nothing.

If judge or her friend had said anything at all that corroborated it flake manchin collins and especially mikursky would have highlighted it as a reason for voting no.

[CRedskinsRule]

Originally Posted by mooby

U right, Senate Judiciary Committee is just as qualified to investigate potential criminal matters as the FBI.

Is it true the FBI had to get permission from the WH as to who they could interview? Idk, but this liberal rag called the Washington Examiner certainly seems to think so.

Also, again are you saying that doctor ford purposely withheld information from the judiciary committee? Or maybe that her lawyers did so they could use the fbi?(i actually might believe that scenario, but again if they purposefully withheld information wouldnt that be obstruction?)

[mooby]

Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule

Also, again are you saying that doctor ford purposely withheld information from the judiciary committee? Or maybe that her lawyers did so they could use the fbi?(i actually might believe that scenario, but again if they purposefully withheld information wouldnt that be obstruction?)

I'm not saying Ford did anything, because I'm not her.

Phrasing should help. We wanted an open FBI investigation, which means the FBI doesn't have to ask WH permission to do their jobs.

But if I was Dr. Ford, who would I rather investigate the matter? The clearly pro-Kavanaugh Judiciary committee or the FBI?

Let's be honest Cred. The whole thing was a sham because the committee already knew which way they were voting unless of course there was indisputable evidence of transgressions. Which there wasn't.

Who in their right mind thought Kavanaugh's close buddies would back up what Ford was saying?

[CRedskinsRule]

Originally Posted by mooby

I'm not saying Ford did anything, because I'm not her.

Phrasing should help. We wanted an open FBI investigation, which means the FBI doesn't have to ask WH permission to do their jobs.

But if I was Dr. Ford, who would I rather investigate the matter? The clearly pro-Kavanaugh Judiciary committee or the FBI?

Let's be honest Cred. The whole thing was a sham because the committee already knew which way they were voting unless of course there was indisputable evidence of transgressions. Which there wasn't.

Who in their right mind thought Kavanaugh's close buddies would back up what Ford was saying?

I agree the whole thing was a sham but i also believe if her friend had in any way at all corroborated her story, even just as simple as saying she went to a party like that with dr ford the nomination would have died. When her self described close friend refused to support any of the accusation i think the whole episode was doomed