Cousins has arrived

[SolidSnake84]

I read an article yesterday morning that claims some internal redskins folks are still arguing on keeping RG3 for next season. I really hope that is not true. For once it appears we have no quarterback controversy. Cousins pulled this team from the ashes this season. To go back to RG3 is not just stupid, it is ludicrous and wrong...

[skinsfan69]

Originally Posted by SolidSnake84

I read an article yesterday morning that claims some internal redskins folks are still arguing on keeping RG3 for next season. I really hope that is not true. For once it appears we have no quarterback controversy. Cousins pulled this team from the ashes this season. To go back to RG3 is not just stupid, it is ludicrous and wrong...

I highly doubt Griffin wants to come back here. I'd assume that he wants a fresh start somewhere else and the organization probably wants the same.

[MTK]

Originally Posted by SolidSnake84

I read an article yesterday morning that claims some internal redskins folks are still arguing on keeping RG3 for next season. I really hope that is not true. For once it appears we have no quarterback controversy. Cousins pulled this team from the ashes this season. To go back to RG3 is not just stupid, it is ludicrous and wrong...

What article?

[Schneed10]

Originally Posted by SolidSnake84

I read an article yesterday morning that claims some internal redskins folks are still arguing on keeping RG3 for next season. I really hope that is not true. For once it appears we have no quarterback controversy. Cousins pulled this team from the ashes this season. To go back to RG3 is not just stupid, it is ludicrous and wrong...

Link, or it wasn't written. I won't believe this until I see it. Yes I realize this is the equivalent of calling BS on you.

[SolidSnake84]

Originally Posted by Schneed10

Link, or it wasn't written. I won't believe this until I see it. Yes I realize this is the equivalent of calling BS on you.

First article here names Dan Snyder as one of the people who are still reluctant to move on from Griffin:
Why Haven’t The Redskins Waived RG3 Yet? « CBS DC

There is another that cited "internal discussion" of if RG3 had any value next year to the team, but i just got home from work. I will look through my history, but I read it this morning.

[Schneed10]

Originally Posted by SolidSnake84

First article here names Dan Snyder as one of the people who are still reluctant to move on from Griffin:
Why Haven’t The Redskins Waived RG3 Yet? « CBS DC

There is another that cited "internal discussion" of if RG3 had any value next year to the team, but i just got home from work. I will look through my history, but I read it this morning.

It's absurd for you to even mention this piece, let alone for the guy to actually write it.

There is no basis for fact in the entire thing, no quotes from inside sources, nothing. It's all bullshit speculation and completely preposterous.

We should demand better from our posters here.

[over the mountain]

Originally Posted by Schneed10

It's absurd for you to even mention this piece, let alone for the guy to actually write it.

There is no basis for fact in the entire thing, no quotes from inside sources, nothing. It's all bullshit speculation and completely preposterous.

We should demand better from our posters here.

You called BS that Solid actually read an article .. he provided the article ... and now we passively aggressively attack Solid? yeesh, tough crowd.

[Schneed10]

Originally Posted by over the mountain

You called BS that Solid actually read an article .. he provided the article ... and now we passively aggressively attack Solid? yeesh, tough crowd.

Not passively. Aggressively. I'm telling him that this is garbage and he shouldn't be posting it.

Nobody should. Don't we all have an internal bullshit meter? If someone writes a story with no facts provided or sources quoted, then isn't it painfully obvious that it's nothing but click-bait??

[30gut]

Originally Posted by Schneed10

..... If someone writes a story with no facts provided or sources quoted, then isn't it painfully obvious that it's nothing but click-bait??

Since when has that stopped anyone around here?

The story is garbage (as is most modern sports "media") but not much different then a bunch of other articles.

[CRedskinsRule]

Originally Posted by Schneed10

Not passively. Aggressively. I'm telling him that this is garbage and he shouldn't be posting it.

Nobody should. Don't we all have an internal bullshit meter? If someone writes a story with no facts provided or sources quoted, then isn't it painfully obvious that it's nothing but click-bait??

I think you were right about calling not having an initial link, but once posted, it's the writer's fault, not someone here at the warpath, that the article is full of hearsay, rumors and idiocy.

And that article will obviously be discounted by most.

[SolidSnake84]

Originally Posted by Schneed10

Not passively. Aggressively. I'm telling him that this is garbage and he shouldn't be posting it.

Nobody should. Don't we all have an internal bullshit meter? If someone writes a story with no facts provided or sources quoted, then isn't it painfully obvious that it's nothing but click-bait??

It's okay. I am not offended by Schneed's post to me. He is a good poster here, I respect his opinion, and there are actually some things that we have agreed on over the past couple of years. Unless i'm reading him wrong i'm pretty sure he was not attacking me personally, just saying that my provided article was BS. It's all good.

[punch it in]

Originally Posted by Schneed10

Not passively. Aggressively. I'm telling him that this is garbage and he shouldn't be posting it.



Nobody should. Don't we all have an internal bullshit meter? If someone writes a story with no facts provided or sources quoted, then isn't it painfully obvious that it's nothing but click-bait??

As Calia might say.....
"Lighten up Francis"