Not drafting a QB a mistake?

[That Guy]

Originally Posted by 30gut

Your question has already been covered. And I don't profess know which QBs will or won't be better then our guys......and neither do you.

really, cause i've yet to see you state a name. someone else mentioned grayson, and that's been it.

I've already stated i don't think anyone pans out to do great things pages ago, so i'm accountable. you decided not to make any predictions cause then we could look back and say that you were wrong, and, well we can't have that now can we?

if you're not going to put up, then it's probably time to stop this pointless exercise. either there's someone that would be better than who we've got or there isn't. the vacuous "we should pick somebody, but i have no idea who" leads to thinking up imaginary players that might be better than the ones that were actually available in this draft.

if you're going to say you have no idea and i don't either, great, then we'll defer to the experts, which decided it wasn't a good idea. /thread.

[30gut]

Originally Posted by That Guy

really, cause i've yet to see you state a name. someone else mentioned grayson, and that's been it.

If you haven't been following the thread that's your issue. You are telling me to do something I've already done in this thread. Maybe if you asked instead of making, and repeating a false claim I would be more inclined to restate. But obviously by the tone of your post really not interested in a discussion, which is fine too.

if you're not going to put up, then it's probably time to stop this pointless exercise.

By all means feel free stop posting if its a poontless exercise, no one is twisting your arm.

either there's someone that would be better than who we've got or there isn't.

What you done here is create a false standard for draft picks. Its a fiction. No one 'knows' what will happen with any draft pick. And it kinda makes your stance disingenuous.

[That Guy]

Originally Posted by 30gut

If you haven't been following the thread that's your issue. You are telling me to do something I've already done in this thread. Maybe if you asked instead of making, and repeating a false claim I would be more inclined to restate. But obviously by the tone of your post really not interested in a discussion, which is fine too.

great, either show me where you cited an actual draft prospect's ame or repeat it, cause i don't see it. telling me to find something that doesn't exist is stupid.

you're obviously not interested in a discussion though, since all you seem to be capable of is deflecting instead of actually trying to move the conversation forward.

Originally Posted by 30gut

What you done here is create a false standard for draft picks. Its a fiction. No one 'knows' what will happen with any draft pick.

what you've done here is fail to recognize context. you can't predict the future? well, no s$%#. I was asking what prospect you see that has more upside than kirk cousins. cause if they don't project a ceiling or show they're better than him in 2 years, the pick would be a total waste. if they aren't starting here though, they really aren't helping us all that much - hence my position. but i have a feeling you're trying to play with context and semantics here to avoid actually having to back up your claim with any kind of observable statement that could later be proven wrong... yet again.

[30gut]

Originally Posted by That Guy

...but i have a feeling.

Sure.