![]() |
|
Debating with the enemy Discuss politics, current events, and other hot button issues here. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#11 | |
Puppy Kicker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Age: 42
Posts: 8,341
|
Re: No indictment in the mike brown case
Quote:
Second of all, I understand that there was evidence showing that perhaps the officer may have actually felt in legitimate fear for his life, however, there are other pieces of evidence that show perhaps he overstepped his bounds. I understand why they didn't, but could also see them bringing charges. I feel if there are two potential stories it's best to send it to court and allow the evidence to be viewed and questioned by both parties. I don't trust eye witness accounts unless 85% of them are all consistent with each other. I also do not trust the officers word one lick. He's in self-preservation mode and we've shown a clear precedent for not going after officers that perjure themselves.
__________________
Best. Player. Available. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|