Pics For Sharing & Debating

[JoeRedskin]

Originally Posted by RedskinRat

That misquote gets you moved up a few spots.

Well, I thought about sticking with your prefered title of "Lord Emperor of Earth", but the reference seemed obvious and fit so well on so many different levels. You're just being pedantic.

Originally Posted by RedskinRat

See? You could have just said "No".

True enough, but where's the fun in that?

Originally Posted by RedskinRat

If someone else should be providing some manner of service then we need to examine the contract and make it null and void. They are doing a terrible job.

Yes. Yes they are. Ah well, 'tis the price of free will. However, never figured you to prefer existence as some infinite being's pet.

Originally Posted by RedskinRat

Science will provide me with a solution to the rosy palm. I'll selectively share with my deserving inner circle.

So long as it's done by an infalllible system of robot judges, I am cool by that.

[RedskinRat]

Originally Posted by JoeRedskin

Well, I thought about sticking with your prefered title of "Lord Emperor of Earth", but the reference seemed obvious and fit so well on so many different levels. You're just being pedantic.

"On", my dear chap, not "Upon". I'm happy with the intent of the rest of it.

[RedskinRat]

Originally Posted by JoeRedskin

Yes. Yes they are. Ah well, 'tis the price of free will. However, never figured you to prefer existence as some infinite being's pet.

'They' being the deity by which we are governed.

Originally Posted by JoeRedskin

So long as it's done by an infalllible system of robot judges, I am cool by that.

Naturally. I have my robot suit picked out already.

[JoeRedskin]

Originally Posted by JoeRedskin

Saddened that, once again, the finite are assuming the duties of the infinite with an obvious and inevitable foolish/evil result? -- Yes.

Originally Posted by RedskinRat

If someone else should be providing some manner of service then we need to examine the contract and make it null and void. They are doing a terrible job.

Originally Posted by JoeRedskin

Yes. Yes they are. Ah well, 'tis the price of free will. However, never figured you to prefer existence as some infinite being's pet.

Originally Posted by RedskinRat

'They' being the deity by which we are governed.

Sorry, I read the term "they" as a plural pronoun referring to those currently providing the service of "assuming the duties of the infinite" and, as such, thought you were referring to the current situation in which an amalgam of finite beings attempts to understand and apply the infinite's will for humanity as revealed by the course of human existence (including, of course, scientific discovery).

Preferring this flawed freedom to eternal and inevitable pet status of the diety you refer to by "they", I would certainly wish to revoke the contract of such a diety. As does orthodox christianity, I prefer my "governing deity" to promote free will, thank you.