07-17-2009, 09:36 AM | #46 | |
Fire Bruce NOW
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 11,434
|
Re: Surprise teams in '09?
Quote:
__________________
Bruce Allen when in charge alone: 4-12 (.250) Bruce Allen's overall Redskins record : 28-52 (.350) Vinny Cerrato's record when in charge alone: 52-65 (.444) Vinny's overall Redskins record: 62-82 (.430) We won more with Vinny |
|
Advertisements |
07-17-2009, 09:47 AM | #47 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,471
|
Re: Surprise teams in '09?
|
07-17-2009, 03:54 PM | #48 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,265
|
Re: Surprise teams in '09?
I think Seattle is going to bounce back pretty strong and I expect them to be in the playoff hunt.
|
07-17-2009, 05:21 PM | #49 |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Redskins Country
Age: 43
Posts: 10
|
Re: Surprise teams in '09?
My two picks are the Texans and the 49ers.
|
07-17-2009, 11:59 PM | #50 |
The Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: 36.28 x 76.22
Age: 73
Posts: 1,812
|
Re: Surprise teams in '09?
My Surprise is no surprise!
Steelers repeat taking it to the G-men! Skins barely miss POs with 9 wins after the OL breaks down after week 7. Two wins each over cow-not-quite men and e-girlz! Zorn and Soup stay! Vinnie-look-inna-my-eyyes stays. We draft a LB in the 1st next year. OL in the 4th and 5th.
__________________
'37, '42, '83, '88, '92. Championship! |
07-18-2009, 01:45 AM | #51 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,323
|
Re: Surprise teams in '09?
Quote:
Bears-I think Juaquin Iglesias will be a really good receiver, i think that Johnny Knox will help out with PR/KR giving Hester more time to work on WR I think Cutler will hook Bennett up b/c they're college buddies Bengals- Have a good defense which got better with a good draft, and they get Carson Palmer back, Chris Henry is getting rave reviews during OTAs and Coles replaces Housh and they got some young receivers waiting in the wings |
|
07-18-2009, 01:50 AM | #52 |
The Starter
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Staunton, VA
Posts: 1,261
|
Re: Surprise teams in '09?
I am going with the Chiefs. Eventhough they are going through an overhaul on and off the field this team has some potential.
|
07-18-2009, 01:54 AM | #53 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Staunton, VA
Posts: 1,261
|
Re: Surprise teams in '09?
Quote:
When I worked in the league we played the Bengals and they were very hard to work with. They were disorganized and did things at the last minute thus causing a headache for all of us in stadium ops. I learned that for the most part, teams that had problems on the field had administrative issues off the field as well. As much as I hate the Cowboys they ran an extremely professional organization and Jerry Jones was the ustmost professional. |
|
07-18-2009, 06:52 AM | #54 |
The Starter
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 1,373
|
Re: Surprise teams in '09?
Today, the Jacksonville Jaguars find themselves at the top of the list for possible relocation - a rumor that Weaver dismisses. In the aforementioned Post article, he affirms his commitment to Jacksonville -- a city he notes to be growing steadily (by almost 20,000 people a year, according to some estimates) -- but acknowledges the challenges in owning and operating a small-market team.
Los Angeles is the top contender. Football and business enthusiasts alike are given to pose the question: “How does Jacksonville have football when LA doesn’t?” Although rhetorical, it’s a compelling query. After all, LA is the second-largest market in the US. With its virtually limitless fanbase and corporate sponsors, the Jaguars’ financial woes would melt away. I know this is off topic. I couldnt imagine the LA JAGS. if they kept the name |
07-18-2009, 08:23 AM | #55 |
The Starter
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 1,228
|
Re: Surprise teams in '09?
I say Raiders and 49ers both winning their divisions. Though the AFC West might be won with a 7-9 record.
__________________
Playing a kids game for a kings ransom. |
07-18-2009, 08:34 PM | #56 | |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 31 Spooner St.
Age: 49
Posts: 9,534
|
Re: Surprise teams in '09?
Quote:
You certainly make a point about how he plays when he starts a new team. However, when he started in Dallas, they went 9-7. The year before he got there, they were 9-7. When he started in Phily, they went 13-3, the year before he got there they were 12-4. Both Phily and Dallas were pretty good teams before he arrived, and did little to make them better. Also, keep in mind that Owens got hurt at the end of his first year in Phily, and did not make a playoff start, but came back for the S.B. The eagles won without him in the playoffs beating Minn. 27-14, and beating Atlanta 27-10. When he came back, they lost 24-21. Not saying there is a direct correlation here, just pointing out the coincidence...or is it?
__________________
Zoltan is ZESTY! - courtesy of joeredskin |
|
07-18-2009, 08:37 PM | #57 | |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 31 Spooner St.
Age: 49
Posts: 9,534
|
Re: Surprise teams in '09?
Quote:
I'd rather see Las Vegas get a team, or even Honolulu.
__________________
Zoltan is ZESTY! - courtesy of joeredskin |
|
07-18-2009, 09:00 PM | #58 |
The Starter
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 1,373
|
Re: Surprise teams in '09?
Im not sayin anything, that was part of an article on MSN, i just couldnt believe the Jags were in that kind of trouble being a new team.
|
07-18-2009, 09:29 PM | #59 |
Fire Bruce NOW
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 11,434
|
Re: Surprise teams in '09?
The Jags get little local support. Their preseason games are blacked out on tv in Jax because no one shows up. And in the regular season, by NFL rules the game cannot be shown locally on tv unless it is a sellout. Because the Jags had no hope of achieving such, they simply covered over a block of seats to make their stadium effectively smaller. Finally, even if they had tons of rabid fans, they play in a small market, which hurts their marketing, etc. The attraction of LA, despite its past failures, is that it is a large market.
__________________
Bruce Allen when in charge alone: 4-12 (.250) Bruce Allen's overall Redskins record : 28-52 (.350) Vinny Cerrato's record when in charge alone: 52-65 (.444) Vinny's overall Redskins record: 62-82 (.430) We won more with Vinny |
07-19-2009, 11:57 AM | #60 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Northern,Va.
Posts: 2,706
|
Re: Surprise teams in '09?
How about we hold the cowboys to zero TD's in our two beatdowns < I mean games > with them ,,,, would that be a suprise ? The pukes lost more than just T.O. ,,, on Defense , Canty , Ellis , Burnett, Henry,R Williams and pacman .
|
|
|