Who is more important, Brunell or Moss?

jamf · 10-27-2005, 08:56 PM

Moss or Brunell?

Discuss

My Pick is brunell. Moss wouldnt have half as many yards if ramsey was our QB. but thats just my opinion.

BigSKINBauer · 10-27-2005, 08:58 PM

i am taking the sissy way out. If moss was to get injured we would be done because no one would be there to replace him, if brunell was injured i think we would manage with ramsey

EternalEnigma21 · 10-27-2005, 09:00 PM

I think patten could fill moss's shoes. I don't know if he'd have all the stats, but he could do his job effectively enough. I dont know now that we have things clicking if one piece here isn't replacable. Not that their not valuble, but they're probably replacable.

mooby · 10-27-2005, 09:03 PM

I'm going with Brunell. If he goes down, Moss's stats wouldn't be that great. Brunell has a veteran leadership. Ramsey holds the ball too long, and he's not much of a leader when you need him to be. Brunell is cracking jokes in the huddle, lightening up everyone's mood.

BigSKINBauer · 10-27-2005, 09:09 PM

we have 4 wide receivers, if moss goes down that is 3 and seeing how patten, thrash and jacobs combine for about 320 total yards i don't see how we could deal without him. Obviously their numbers would go up if moss was gone but moss so far is having one of the best seasons in receiver history.

With that said QB is the most important part of an offense, so i would say Brunell is the "most important".

That Guy · 10-27-2005, 09:33 PM

moss.

MTK · 10-27-2005, 09:48 PM

I think Brunell is the key cog.

His accuracy, his ability to get rid of the ball quickly, his ability to escape the pocket and make things happen, his ability to read a D and get the ball to the hot receiver, I could go on and on.

Of course Moss has made alot of things happen after the catch, but I think the offense just wouldn't click on the same level if you took Brunell out of the mix.

heybigstar · 10-27-2005, 09:48 PM

1 good QB, 1 good WR, they are synergy: 1+1 = 11-5

Schneed10 · 10-28-2005, 09:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by heybigstar

1 good QB, 1 good WR, they are synergy: 1+1 = 11-5

Great post. I agree. They'd both be missed equally.

RDSKNZ · 10-28-2005, 09:37 AM

If I had to pick I would say Brunell because I think with the other WR and the RB I think we could survive without Moss. Let's just hope nothing happens to either of them and all this discussion is a moot point.

amorentz · 10-28-2005, 09:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by heybigstar

1 good QB, 1 good WR, they are synergy: 1+1 = 11-5

I totally agree...I think that either one has difficulty without the other. Sometimes QBs and WRs just have that certain...je ne sais quois shall I say? These two just get each other right now in a very 1+1=100 way and I think both are equally important to the Skins.

illdefined · 10-28-2005, 12:47 AM

we had Brunell last year. we didn't have Moss - whose yards are mostly after the catch. draw your own conclusions.

jamf · 10-28-2005, 01:15 AM

these are different brunells...

dblanch66 · 10-28-2005, 01:58 AM

No brainer. Brunell. He touches the ball every play.

MTK · 10-28-2005, 08:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jamf

these are different brunells...

without a doubt

10-27-2005, 08:56 PM	#1
jamf Pro Bowl Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: San Diego Ca Posts: 5,328	Who is more important, Brunell or Moss? Moss or Brunell? Discuss My Pick is brunell. Moss wouldnt have half as many yards if ramsey was our QB. but thats just my opinion.

10-27-2005, 08:58 PM	#2
BigSKINBauer Pro Bowl Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Washington, DC Age: 36 Posts: 5,688	Re: Who is more important? i am taking the sissy way out. If moss was to get injured we would be done because no one would be there to replace him, if brunell was injured i think we would manage with ramsey

10-27-2005, 09:00 PM	#3
EternalEnigma21 Assistant Regional Mod Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Carbondale CO Age: 45 Posts: 2,958	Re: Who is more important? I think patten could fill moss's shoes. I don't know if he'd have all the stats, but he could do his job effectively enough. I dont know now that we have things clicking if one piece here isn't replacable. Not that their not valuble, but they're probably replacable.

10-27-2005, 09:03 PM	#4
mooby Hug Anne Spyder Join Date: Mar 2005 Posts: 20,547	Re: Who is more important? I'm going with Brunell. If he goes down, Moss's stats wouldn't be that great. Brunell has a veteran leadership. Ramsey holds the ball too long, and he's not much of a leader when you need him to be. Brunell is cracking jokes in the huddle, lightening up everyone's mood.

10-27-2005, 09:09 PM	#5
BigSKINBauer Pro Bowl Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Washington, DC Age: 36 Posts: 5,688	Re: Who is more important? we have 4 wide receivers, if moss goes down that is 3 and seeing how patten, thrash and jacobs combine for about 320 total yards i don't see how we could deal without him. Obviously their numbers would go up if moss was gone but moss so far is having one of the best seasons in receiver history. With that said QB is the most important part of an offense, so i would say Brunell is the "most important".

10-27-2005, 09:33 PM	#6
That Guy Living Legend Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: VA Age: 42 Posts: 17,583	Re: Who is more important? moss.

10-27-2005, 09:48 PM	#7
MTK \m/ Join Date: Feb 2004 Age: 52 Posts: 99,745	Re: Who is more important? I think Brunell is the key cog. His accuracy, his ability to get rid of the ball quickly, his ability to escape the pocket and make things happen, his ability to read a D and get the ball to the hot receiver, I could go on and on. Of course Moss has made alot of things happen after the catch, but I think the offense just wouldn't click on the same level if you took Brunell out of the mix.

10-27-2005, 09:48 PM	#8
heybigstar Special Teams Join Date: Oct 2004 Age: 41 Posts: 375	Re: Who is more important? 1 good QB, 1 good WR, they are synergy: 1+1 = 11-5 __________________ Hail to the Redskins.

10-28-2005, 09:37 AM	#10
RDSKNZ Camp Scrub Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Hickory, North Carolina Age: 52 Posts: 10	Re: Who is more important, Brunell or Moss? If I had to pick I would say Brunell because I think with the other WR and the RB I think we could survive without Moss. Let's just hope nothing happens to either of them and all this discussion is a moot point.

10-28-2005, 12:47 AM	#12
illdefined Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: nyc Age: 49 Posts: 2,631	Re: Who is more important, Brunell or Moss? we had Brunell last year. we didn't have Moss - whose yards are mostly after the catch. draw your own conclusions. __________________ a fan. not a cheerleader.

10-28-2005, 01:15 AM	#13
jamf Pro Bowl Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: San Diego Ca Posts: 5,328	Re: Who is more important, Brunell or Moss? these are different brunells...

10-28-2005, 01:58 AM	#14
dblanch66 The Starter Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Phoenix, AZ Age: 58 Posts: 1,176	Re: Who is more important, Brunell or Moss? No brainer. Brunell. He touches the ball every play.

Who is more important, Brunell or Moss?

Locker Room Main Forum