|
Playbook Forum Suggestions/Comments/Questions |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
11-14-2007, 09:45 PM | #61 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Warpath Myth vs. Reality
Quote:
It's locked so we don't get a huge argument over it. The link is still there...
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
Advertisements |
11-14-2007, 09:49 PM | #62 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: West VA
Posts: 726
|
Re: Warpath Myth vs. Reality
So if mod speculates and thinks a thread is going to create a debate that is already being discussed he or she can shut it down immediately? I was told if I started the "I hate Kool Aid Drinkers" thread, that it would not be shut down (see postings above). What's the difference?
|
11-14-2007, 09:51 PM | #63 | |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Warpath Myth vs. Reality
Quote:
However, I locked it (as I and Tripp have pointed out) to try to keep the site clean by minimizing the number of essentially duplicate threads.
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
11-14-2007, 10:12 PM | #64 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 158
|
Re: Warpath Myth vs. Reality
i post very rarely but the threads are getting ridiculouls. i have learned to only pabuty attention to who posts the threads. there are alot of post whores here but i really like taking a look at all opinions. i had a very bitter dispute with someone a while ago and they were banned for asking my address to kick my ass and that is out of like for a difference of opinion. i have also been on long enouph to know banned peeps are only out for being vulgar or atacking members. that's the only reason you will be kicked so if you are not vulgar or attacking fellow skins why does it affect you?
|
11-14-2007, 10:14 PM | #65 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 158
|
Re: Warpath Myth vs. Reality
and appoligize for spelling, wow. i would not win a 3rd grade spelling bee.
|
11-14-2007, 10:46 PM | #66 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: West VA
Posts: 726
|
Re: Warpath Myth vs. Reality
Quote:
The thread poked fun at Gibbs for his vocabulary. Many threads debated whether or not Gibbs has been a good coach or made good personnel moves, but this one merely made fun of the man's press conferences, so why wasn't it unique? |
|
11-14-2007, 10:50 PM | #67 | |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Warpath Myth vs. Reality
Quote:
I'd like to think that I have more often than not made good judgement calls
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
11-14-2007, 10:52 PM | #68 |
Swearinger
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 12,626
|
Re: Warpath Myth vs. Reality
The link is still there for all to see. With all the Gibbs stuff flying around, it's just not necessary to have another 100 posts on a new thread. I personally think it's a funny link, but not worth it's own thread, at least not this week. Any other week when the Gibbs subject matter around here isn't so volatile and my guess is the thread wouldn't have been closed. It's SS call to make, and it's the right one.
__________________
Tardy |
11-15-2007, 12:16 AM | #69 | |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Warpath Myth vs. Reality
Quote:
Still think the assumption that I locked it because it's negative is pretty ignorant but whatever
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
11-15-2007, 12:17 AM | #70 |
Swearinger
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 12,626
|
Re: Warpath Myth vs. Reality
I agree. Repetitive, not negative.
__________________
Tardy |
11-15-2007, 07:06 AM | #71 |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 51
Posts: 99,331
|
Re: Warpath Myth vs. Reality
Should have left it locked.
|
11-15-2007, 06:15 PM | #72 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Denver
Age: 42
Posts: 2,762
|
Re: Warpath Myth vs. Reality
@paulskinsfan:
Just so you know, you would have CERTAINLY been banned for AT LEAST 2 weeks if you questioned the mods' decisions on that Tampa Bay board, like you have with the Gibbs Vocab thread. It could have even been a 3 month ban -- they hand 'em out like candy. Just the simple fact that you can have the discussion with the mods about that thread, and why it was locked, speaks volumes about their leniency and fairness. And, they even re-opened it! What does that tell you?
__________________
To succeed in the world it is not enough to be stupid, you must also be well-mannered. |
11-16-2007, 12:09 AM | #73 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Washington, D.C.
Age: 51
Posts: 762
|
Re: Warpath Myth vs. Reality
This is a great skins site. Kudos to the mods for a fantastic job running it. There are fans as well as fanatics on here. I don't post on here often, and when I do post, I often disagree/argue with mods and fanatics alike. Love the kool aid vs anti kool aid perspectives and banter that goes on.
I initially didn't see the need for this "put things in perspective" thread, but it does serve a huge purpose. We're all at our cantankerous best after a loss, especially a loss in a season following a losing season, and especially in a season following a losing season that in turn followed a playoff season. No matter how much we regard/disregard individuals that play, coach, or manage the organization, we're all linked by our desire to see the Skins be great again. Fuck the Tampa Bay Bucs site and the mods that run it and I resent the fact that The Warpath was ever mentioned in the same breath. |
11-16-2007, 09:08 AM | #74 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: West VA
Posts: 726
|
Re: Warpath Myth vs. Reality
Quote:
I agree with you Ghetto. Although Ive knocked heads many many times with SS and Matt, they have always allowed different voices to be heard as long as there is at least some rational thought behind the voices. I must admit, when the thread was reopened, and I saw the first few responses, I thought that SS was going to be right. It looked like it would just turn into a Gibbs debate again, and in fact there were anti and pro Gibbs posts. I was just about to PM SS as well as post here and ask SS to re-lock, and admit I was wrong. Luckily, several others saw the spirit of the thread, and I think its back on track. Im actually looking forward to the Gibbs press conference win or lose to get some more quotes. Of course if they win, Im outta here for 2 weeks per my bet with SS. |
|
11-16-2007, 12:02 PM | #75 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: The Southeast
Age: 40
Posts: 2,119
|
Re: Warpath Myth vs. Reality
Quote:
Reading this post just made me realize that of all the time I spend online, and all the hobbies and interests I have and spend time on, this is the only online forum in which I participate. I've tried others but just lost interest. The conversation wasn't stimulating or sufficient or the place was poorly run. I can honestly say that in a good 15+ years of watching and observing online forums, this is the only one to which I keep coming back. That all may seem minor, but for me it's a real testament to how well this place is run. A good discussion forum is good because it's well run from the top down. Yeah we all disagree from time to time, or on a regular basis, but how fun would this place be if everyone was agreeing and saying the same thing the whole time? I've learned more from arguing my point with people than I would by just having people nod and agree. In short, I love this place, and I love all you guys. ::sniff:: (yes, I suppose I even love offiss and irish too)
__________________
Your post count, reputation score, popularity ranking, VIP tag or funny signature has no bearing on how I value you as an individual. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|