Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Kirk Cousins 24/7 thread

Locker Room Main Forum


View Poll Results: What should the Redskins do with Cousins?
Sign him to a long term deal 47 75.81%
Let him walk 4 6.45%
Use the franchise tag again 11 17.74%
Voters: 62. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-01-2016, 05:29 PM   #106
NC_Skins
Gamebreaker
 
NC_Skins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 14,602
Re: Kirk Cousins 24/7 thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by MTK View Post
Check Bradford's new deal for the definition of overpaid.


So now that they overpaid the shit out of Bradford, very little chance we see a long term deal with Cousins this year.

Sam Bradford is the Jeff Fisher of quarterbacks. Mediocre as hell, but continues to get paid a kings ransom and stay employed.
__________________
"So let me get this straight. We have the event of the year on TV with millions watching around the world... and people want a punt, pass, and kick competition to be the halftime entertainment?? Folks, don't quit your day jobs."- Matty
NC_Skins is offline  

Advertisements
Old 03-01-2016, 06:39 PM   #107
Chico23231
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
Chico23231's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 35,038
Re: Kirk Cousins 24/7 thread

Howie roseman said last year was great, let's lock everybody up to extensions
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler

He Gets Us
Chico23231 is offline  
Old 03-01-2016, 07:11 PM   #108
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,846
Re: Kirk Cousins 24/7 thread

Bradford’s structure, guarantee on signing will give better picture of real value | ProFootballTalk
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline  
Old 03-01-2016, 07:18 PM   #109
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,846
Re: Kirk Cousins 24/7 thread

@AndrewBrandt
Some details on Bradford/Eagles deal: of $26M total guarantee, $22M fully guaranteed upon signing. $18M in 2016, up to $20M w/playoff wins.

Bradford details continued: $11M signing bonus, $7M salary in 2016. $4M of 2017 salary fully guaranteed, another $4M guaranteed for injury.

Bradford gets fully secured $22M, $2M more than Tag w/playoff upside. Eagles get 2nd year option with $4M risk, another $4M if major injury.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline  
Old 03-01-2016, 07:26 PM   #110
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,846
Re: Kirk Cousins 24/7 thread

At this point I'm content with letting KC play on the tag this year. If he earns the monster deal next year so be it. It would be a win/win all around.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline  
Old 03-01-2016, 11:43 PM   #111
skinsfan69
Living Legend
 
skinsfan69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,453
Re: Kirk Cousins 24/7 thread

Eagles really had no choice. What was the alternative? Chase Daniel? QB's that are average...Bradford, Alex Smith, Tannehill and Dalton are all making big money. It's just the way the league is trending. You have to overpay if you have a average starter.
skinsfan69 is offline  
Old 03-01-2016, 11:58 PM   #112
Daseal
Puppy Kicker
 
Daseal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Age: 42
Posts: 8,341
Re: Kirk Cousins 24/7 thread

John Elway said it best. There's no middle class for the QB. You're likely either going to overpay or have a journeyman. (last sentence was mine).

I think the franchise tag is the right call. If Cousins does it 2 years in a row, something the Redskins havent done for a long time, then let's wrap him up for quite a few years.
__________________
Best. Player. Available.
Daseal is offline  
Old 03-02-2016, 12:03 AM   #113
Hijinx
The Starter
 
Hijinx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Age: 50
Posts: 1,961
Re: Kirk Cousins 24/7 thread

Quarterbacks almost never get non-exclusive.* I know it is rare for teams to be willing to pay two 1st rounders , but quarterbacks is a different thing. Is it so unlikely that the Texans(22nd pick) or the Broncos(32nd pick) would give a late 1st this year and next to solve their QB problems?

The Skins paid more than that to move up and get RG3. Is there that much Cap savings in the non exclusive tag?

*Edit- Once in the last decade and that was Matt Cassel whom the Pats didn't even want to keep just used him as trade bait.
__________________
This is my signature, there are many like it, but this one is mine.
Hijinx is offline  
Old 03-02-2016, 12:37 AM   #114
FRPLG
MVP
 
FRPLG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 10,164
Re: Kirk Cousins 24/7 thread

You either have a QB that can play well enough for you to win or you're picking in the top ten. That's the name of the game in the NFL now. There's no in between. As others have said if not Cousins, then who? It's an odd phenomenon in the NFL...there's really no such thing as average. You're QB can play and you pay him 15-20 a year or he sucks.
FRPLG is offline  
Old 03-02-2016, 02:42 AM   #115
CRedskinsRule
Living Legend
 
CRedskinsRule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 58
Posts: 21,702
Re: Kirk Cousins 24/7 thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hijinx View Post
Quarterbacks almost never get non-exclusive.* I know it is rare for teams to be willing to pay two 1st rounders , but quarterbacks is a different thing. Is it so unlikely that the Texans(22nd pick) or the Broncos(32nd pick) would give a late 1st this year and next to solve their QB problems?

The Skins paid more than that to move up and get RG3. Is there that much Cap savings in the non exclusive tag?

*Edit- Once in the last decade and that was Matt Cassel whom the Pats didn't even want to keep just used him as trade bait.
I believe the difference is $5-6 Million, it also changes the bar that the long term deal negotiations start from.
CRedskinsRule is offline  
Old 03-02-2016, 03:09 AM   #116
That Guy
Living Legend
 
That Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,620
Re: Kirk Cousins 24/7 thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule View Post
I believe the difference is $5-6 Million, it also changes the bar that the long term deal negotiations start from.
no, non exclusive or exclusive, the franchise tag is 19.9m, the transition tag (where he can walk and you get nothing if you don't match another team's deal) is 17.something.
That Guy is offline  
Old 03-02-2016, 03:12 AM   #117
CRedskinsRule
Living Legend
 
CRedskinsRule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 58
Posts: 21,702
Re: Kirk Cousins 24/7 thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by That Guy View Post
no, non exclusive or exclusive, the franchise tag is 19.9m, the transition tag (where he can walk and you get nothing if you don't match another team's deal) is 17.something.
My understanding is that the exclusive tag would be plus or minus 25.5M, or about 5-6M more. That's what espn980 was saying on the afternoon radio.

Sent from my S6 Edge
CRedskinsRule is offline  
Old 03-02-2016, 08:54 AM   #118
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,846
Re: Kirk Cousins 24/7 thread

Word is KC will sign the deal pretty quickly, and why the hell wouldn't he?
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline  
Old 03-02-2016, 09:50 AM   #119
over the mountain
Playmaker
 
over the mountain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: close to the edge
Posts: 4,926
Re: Kirk Cousins 24/7 thread

Im a big KC fan but I do have questions of whether:

1. he can execute against top 10 defenses

2. he can execute wout Jordan Reed

If he wants more than 18 mil per, let him play under the tag and prove he is worth the money. Then, in 2017, paying him 25m under the tag isnt too horrible.
__________________
Life is brutal, but beautiful
over the mountain is offline  
Old 03-02-2016, 10:21 AM   #120
That Guy
Living Legend
 
That Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,620
Re: Kirk Cousins 24/7 thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule View Post
My understanding is that the exclusive tag would be plus or minus 25.5M, or about 5-6M more. That's what espn980 was saying on the afternoon radio.

Sent from my S6 Edge
dunno what they were talking about, but exclusive or non exclusive franchise tags are both 19.9m for QBs this year from everything i've seen. next year the price goes up a minimum of 20%, which would be 24m, which is also less than whatever they were discussing.
That Guy is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 1.30312 seconds with 11 queries