![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Washington DC
Age: 38
Posts: 16,867
|
Re: Lavar In 2008
Quote:
Bruce Smith in '08? Russ Grimm in '08?
__________________
Establishment, establishment, you always know what's best. I've been a part of this message board for 17 years. Damn I'm old. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Fight for old DC!
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Aldie, VA
Age: 47
Posts: 4,101
|
Re: Lavar In 2008
Patrick Ramsey in 08!
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Washington DC
Age: 38
Posts: 16,867
|
Re: Lavar In 2008
__________________
Establishment, establishment, you always know what's best. I've been a part of this message board for 17 years. Damn I'm old. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 19
|
Re: Lavar In 2008
I still don't get why the redskins treated lavar so badly. He went to pro bowls when he was on this team and was probably your only quality LB until Fletcher came this year.
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,807
|
Re: Lavar In 2008
Marcus Washington.
__________________
"It's not about what you've done, but what's been done for you." |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 19
|
Re: Lavar In 2008
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,807
|
Re: Lavar In 2008
I think a lot of people around here would argue that 53 has played better, more consistent football than Lavar. Lavar had all the talent in the world and was fearless, but it never translated into being a consistently dominant player on the field.
I said Marcus Washington because you said we did not have a solid LB before London Fletcher signed here last year. Marcus Washington is my rebuttal to that statement. Antonio Pierce was another solid LB when he was here. He flourished the first year under GWilliams's system, but was let walk after just a year.
__________________
"It's not about what you've done, but what's been done for you." |
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
\m/
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,846
|
Re: Lavar In 2008
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,540
|
Re: Lavar In 2008
Quote:
From there it was all downhill. While I loved Lavar here, please don't buy the hype that he was a great player. He was a great athlete, big difference. For more info, there's a couple books worth of Lavar threads here. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Halfmoon, NY
Posts: 687
|
Re: Lavar In 2008
Quote:
Pierce Marshall McIntosh Washington It pains me to admit it, but Piece was nasty under Williams' system; Arrington lost his starting job to Lemar Marshall, McIntosh is starting to grow and misses tackles far less than Arrington did, and Marcus Washington has been a steady force. Yes, Arrington could turn a game around with a single hit, but if he had any idea what his assignment was on half the plays it would be a surprise, and that was a far greater detriment than his hitting ability was an asset. The point is, he is far from our only quality LB since he left. During his last season here, and in the years since, the Skins' linebacking corp has been, for the most part, tough, talented, and dependable. Arrington was only talented. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Seoul, Korea
Age: 46
Posts: 76
|
Re: Lavar In 2008
Quote:
Also... Mcintosh is still unproven. And it looks like he's also injury prone. His developement has been good but it's too soon to tell. Washington is consistent and gets the job done. However he is not a playmaker nor is he the type of talent that Lavar was. Pierce is probably the only quality LB that u mentioned here. Anyhow, I just love how warpath is divided into the pro-lavar & the anti-lavar. Me personally I like him. I think his agent mis-represented Lavar severely during the contract negotiations and probably was the bad apple that soured his tenure here and with the organization. All in all, I hope that Lavar plays somewhere again. He's got too much passion and talent to be wasted. Here is the video where he knocked Aikman into retirement. YouTube - LaVar retires Aikman |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: hampton roads
Posts: 92
|
Re: Lavar In 2008
How about defense being a team when Lavar played his great years how many games did we have a top rated defense?
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Halfmoon, NY
Posts: 687
|
Re: Lavar In 2008
Quote:
I don't mean to suggest that these guys are all pro-bowlers, but they all are/were competent for this team, and therefore were "quality" guys. I wouldn't say McIntosh is unproven; he was kicking ass in the beginning of this season, and then forced offenses to adjust to his side of the field. Washington's first two years with us were very productive; he was a pro-bowler in '04, and an alternate in '05 and '06. And as far as Lemar Marshall goes, don't forget he took Arrington's job, and not just because Arrington was hurt. Williams preferred Marshall to Arrington because he made less mistakes. Marshall will never be a playmaker nor will he ever go to a pro-bowl, and it was stupid to move him to the MLB and have him running the defense, but he was an OLB on the leagues 3rd best defense in '04, and I don't remember anyone suggesting he was a weakspot on the team. In fact, it was his success as an outside linebacker that encouraged Williams to try him as MLB. Stellar player? No. "Quality"? Yes. The accusation I was responding to was suggesting that our linebacking corp has been weak since LeVar left, which is simply untrue. With the exception of '06 (when our d-line and our secondary were equally as bad), our linebackers have been a consistent strength of our defense. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: hampton roads
Posts: 92
|
Re: Lavar In 2008
McIntosh, Williams and Fletcher have consist defense something that Lavar's Special Defense did not have as great as he was
\team work will beat one person every time Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 573
|
Well...since LeVar was my favorite Redskin, you'd think I would want him to come back to the team, but Williams doesn't like "star players," so I hope he doesn't try to sign with them again. Personally I thought he would have been great in passing situations, but they chose to take him out on third down. I didn't understand the logic then, and if somebody tried to explain it to me, I still wouldn't get it. All I know is that he won games for us while he was healthy. We got him out of college, not from another team, and I'm sick of the Redskins taking retreads from other teams for high draft choices. I want them to look for the next "LeVar" with draft choices, not trade those picks for somebody else's rejects.
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|