Skins vs DA BEARS pre game thread

[los panda]

odds on hall intercepting cutler 5 times?

[Monkeydad]

Originally Posted by los panda

odds on hall intercepting cutler 5 times?

I saw Hall gets 2, Amerson gets 1 and Rob Jackson gets 1.

3 sacks for Kerrigan, 8 total for the team.

[DynamiteRave]

Originally Posted by Monkeydad

I saw Hall gets 2, Amerson gets 1 and Rob Jackson gets 1.

3 sacks for Kerrigan, 8 total for the team.

There's a chance of Amerson not playing. Limited practices this week. Battling a concussion.

[Meks]

^^^^

greeeeaaaaaaaaaat . lol that's all we need.

[Monkeydad]

Read that we released Pugh this week.

Did we activate someone else or was he cut for the longsnapper or that other special teams guy we signed? Sundberg and Kehl are both done for the year, right?

[SmootSmack]

Originally Posted by Monkeydad

Read that we released Pugh this week.

Did we activate someone else or was he cut for the longsnapper or that other special teams guy we signed? Sundberg and Kehl are both done for the year, right?

Yeah D Rave covered it. I think in this thread, but maybe not. Sundberg, Kehl on IR. Pugh waived. Signed Trenton Robinson (S/CB-mainly special teams); Josh Hull (LB-mainly special teams), Kyle Nelson (long snapper)

[JoeRedskin]

Originally Posted by KI Skins Fan

6 (highlighted part). Per SmootSmack on this board. I don't know if KS is micromanaging.

7. Never said it is all the coaches fault.

8 (new). I don't mind that you disagree with me but I'd appreciate it if you wouldn't be sarcastic and mocking next time.

As I was catching up on posts, yours was the fourth or fifth "Shanny sucks" I read and, to me, was simply one more in the long line of posts presenting opinionated conclusions as a logical result based on a set of "facts" which were, really, merely another set of opinions. In addition, your negative "facts" in 4-6 were only tangentially relatable to any real, provable fact and ignored the multitude of other provable facts, unrelated to your conclusion, which could be their cause. Such biased "analysis" tends to send my sarcasm meter off the deep end.

I am sorry if your feelings were hurt. However, I thought your post was intrinsically flawed and its apparent conclusion to be a vast oversimplification of the issues facing the Skins. After highlighting these flaws and oversimplifications, and after one too many similar posts, I chose sarcasm b/c I was simply tired of the BS of those who hold similar opinions and are equally casual with their "facts"/logic. So, to be clear, it was not meant as a personal attack but just a vent at the plethora of "Shanny sucks" posts that currently litter the otherwise intelligent conversation that takes place on this board.

[Hog1]

Originally Posted by JoeRedskin

As I was catching up on posts, yours was the fourth or fifth "Shanny sucks" I read and, to me, was simply one more in the long line of posts presenting opinionated conclusions as a logical result based on a set of "facts" which were, really, merely another set of opinions. In addition, your negative "facts" in 4-6 were only tangentially relatable to any real, provable fact and ignored the multitude of other provable facts, unrelated to your conclusion, which could be their cause. Such biased "analysis" tends to send my sarcasm meter off the deep end.

I am sorry if your feelings were hurt. However, I thought your post was intrinsically flawed and its apparent conclusion to be a vast oversimplification of the issues facing the Skins. After highlighting these flaws and oversimplifications, and after one too many similar posts, I chose sarcasm b/c I was simply tired of the BS of those who hold similar opinions and are equally casual with their "facts"/logic. So, to be clear, it was not meant as a personal attack but just a vent at the plethora of "Shanny sucks" posts that currently litter the otherwise intelligent conversation that takes place on this board.

Is it any wonder why you were selected for your recent promotion.....
Tangentially?.....sweet coup de gras

[SmootSmack]

Originally Posted by KI Skins Fan

6 (highlighted part). Per SmootSmack on this board. I don't know if KS is micromanaging.

7. Never said it is all the coaches fault.

8 (new). I don't mind that you disagree with me but I'd appreciate it if you wouldn't be sarcastic and mocking next time.

To be clear, I don't know how common this is around the league. I just know that one of the reasons they chose not to go with a veteran WR coach this offseason was that Kyle is already very involved with the WRs (having been one himself I suppose), and to a lesser extent with the QBs

[Evilgrin]

Greg Cosell made alot of good points this week on the skins, anyone brought that up?

[skinsfaninok]

^ what were they?

[SmootSmack]

Originally Posted by skinsfaninok

^ what were they?

Question 3...The Sequel

[GTripp0012]

I'm 0-5 picking the Redskins game this year straight up, so I've got the Bears this week. You're all welcome.

[GTripp0012]

Originally Posted by Chico23231

which aggie will have the better NFL career, Johnny Manziel or Tannehill?

All else equal (i.e. Manziel plays for Sumlin in the NFL the same that Tannehill got to play for Sherman)? Manziel is the better prospect. I don't think it's that close.

[Evilgrin]

That the offense hasn't progressed because of Griffin's injury, Sums it up. He think's that Griffin needs more time to develop as a pocket passer also. IE some bad games were going to happen.