Pro Bowl Bound - Samuels, Moss

Redskins8588 · 12-23-2005, 12:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wewhite3

Its wouldn't my brother....

Before you go pointing out grammar inaccuracies, just remember when you point you always have three fingers pointing back at you...

Its McNabb not Mc Nabb...
"What style is that, Vick, Culpepper, Mc Nabb.... you mean that style?"
http://www.thewarpath.net/showthread...6&page=5&pp=10

It is two not to...
"I have to black sons...."
http://www.thewarpath.net/showthread...6&page=6&pp=10

SmootSmack · 12-23-2005, 12:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jdlea

No, that's not bad at all, however, if you gave Vick Jimmy Smith and Keenan McCardell in their prime he could have probably done it too.

Not to get off topic but isn't it remarkable that McCardell was a 12th ROUND PICK!! by the Redskins in 1991? And now he has over 800 career receptions. After five years of doing nothing, his career really took off when he joined the Jags in '96.

I guess maybe the same could happen to Jacobs

ST21 · 12-23-2005, 01:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Redskins8588

Before you go pointing out grammar inaccuracies, just remeber when you point you always have three fingers pointing back at you...

Its McNabb not Mc Nabb...
"What style is that, Vick, Culpepper, Mc Nabb.... you mean that style?"
http://www.thewarpath.net/showthread...6&page=5&pp=10

It is two not to...
"I have to black sons...."
http://www.thewarpath.net/showthread...6&page=6&pp=10

dont you mean "Remember"....check your grammar

mooby · 12-23-2005, 01:38 AM

what they should've done is put cooley on the tight end ballot, then put sellers on the fullback ballot. I think sellers should've gone to the pro bowl, portis loves having him as the lead blocker, he's also a touchdown scoring machine inside the red zone, and he's been very productive for a fullback.

Redskins8588 · 12-23-2005, 01:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wewhite3

dont you mean "Remember"....check your grammar

Those were two in just one post I am sure I could find more, but then that just would be wasting my time...

skins052bgr8 · 12-23-2005, 08:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joe Knows...

Well this is just disapointing that Marcus Washington, Sean Taylor, and Cornelius Griffen didn't make it. Randy Thomas should have made it too but like the true warrior brave he is, he sacraficed his body and got injured. I also agree that Samuels hasn't proved himself enough to be a perenial pro bowler.

But the whole issue really is that we don't get enough national esposure. If we continue to win, then our players will get elected into the Pro Bowl. That's the whole reason Moss was able to be voted in. He had that huge game on Monday Night Football in front of a national audiance and then again last week against the Cowboys.

I blame the issue on ESPN. All they ever talk about is Mike Vick, Donnovan and T.O. and The Cowboys, and the Colts. And they always hate on the Redskins. Wich could be a reason why our players don't get the Reccognition they deserve.

If we go into the playoffs and play well in front the nation, then next season our guys will be huge on NFL fans rader.

Redskins players I thought should be in the playoffs...

Santanna Moss
Cornelius Griffen
Marcus Washington
Shawn Springs
Sean Taylor
Randy Thomas
Clinton Portis
Jon Janson
Chris Cooley

And Mike Sellers shoud get some honest consideration for all his TDs, special teams, and lead blocks for Clinton Portis.

Joe you do know, we can argue up and down about stats and wins, but it comes down to how they are perceived on an National level. The skins were almost unbearable to watch last year from a fans standpoint and were predicted to finish dead last this year. That does not carry well with your coverage and your appeal to the Sportswriters, Sports shows, and in turn the national audience opinion of you is you did not do anything in the off season to better yourself, in turn your (opinion)players are not that good. Much of the opinions of your normal NFL fan outside their normal team start at ESPN and they are bandwagon jumpers from way back and have been on the Panthers, Seahawks, Eagles, Cowboys, Colts, Bengals, Falcons, and select other teams with coverage all year even when they have stunk in up lately. These are all teams they picked from the beginning of the year to be in the playoffs and contenders. Skins began to sway the opinions and get some media coverage, but the midseason crash when most of your voting takes place with 2-5 stretch does not get coverage except that the opinion they are not very good in the national eye. Moss was the only player getting coverage for the skins and it all began with the breakout on National TV against a highly media loved Cowboys. From that game on he was in categories even when they talked about other top receivers like S. Smith, Torry Holt, Harrison, etc... when they looked at stats whether he was on top or 2nd or 3rd you always saw his name and the reason the skins were lossing is because he is so good and was the entire skins offense he demands double and triple coverage, that gets you a pro bowl bid, but he did deserve. I follow the skins and watch every play of every game, but spot watch other teams and games and only can get my opinion of their play from that and the media outlets. I would have to agree with Joe's list of Skins that should have been in, but our team play and the losses we had did not help our bid for National coverage and exposure to the players. If we go to the playoffs this year and fill some holes in the off-season we will be in a better position next year for pro bowl bids.

ST21 · 12-23-2005, 05:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Redskins8588

Those were two in just one post I am sure I could find more, but then that just would be wasting my time...

Really, I'm sure your trying to make a point.....but trust me, Rush....I dont care....do what you do.......just keep your neck covered, its going get chapped

That Guy · 12-23-2005, 07:37 PM

can we quit the pointless off topic sniping please?

Redskins8588 · 12-23-2005, 11:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wewhite3

Really, I'm sure your trying to make a point.....but trust me, Rush....I dont care....do what you do.......just keep your neck covered, its going get chapped

Surprise, surprise, wewhite3 is trying to make something else into a "race" war... Who would have thought that?!?!

TheMalcolmConnection · 12-23-2005, 11:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wewhite3

Yea thats worked out for everybody.......

That doesn't' even make sense.

SmootSmack · 12-23-2005, 11:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Redskins8588

Surprise, surprise, wewhite3 is trying to make something else into a "race" war... Who would have thought that?!?!

Damn I feel dumb. I couldn't figure out what the hell he meant by Rush. I was like what does a Canadian rock band have to do with anything? Been hittin' that bum wine too hard!

This really better not be turning into another "You all say Vick is overrated because he's black" discussion. I'm getting sick of those. And yes the same person brings that issue up everytime.

TheMalcolmConnection · 12-23-2005, 11:32 PM

Yes! And those who know me, know that I normally am not someone who starts shit, but seriously, it's a FOOTBALL GAME, just f-ing CHILL.

ST21 · 12-24-2005, 05:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Redskins8588

Surprise, surprise, wewhite3 is trying to make something else into a "race" war... Who would have thought that?!?!

:FIREdevil :FIREdevil :FIREdevil :FIREdevil :FIREdevil :FIREdevil :FIREdevil
:FIREdevil :FIREdevil :FIREdevil :FIREdevil:FIREdevil:FIREdevil:FIREdevil:

O KKK, wutever you sayyy sayyy sayyy.......

ST21 · 12-24-2005, 05:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TAFKAS

Damn I feel dumb. I couldn't figure out what the hell he meant by Rush. I was like what does a Canadian rock band have to do with anything? Been hittin' that bum wine too hard!

This really better not be turning into another "You all say Vick is overrated because he's black" discussion. I'm getting sick of those. And yes the same person brings that issue up everytime.

WHO?????????

Redskins8588 · 12-24-2005, 05:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wewhite3

:FIREdevil :FIREdevil :FIREdevil :FIREdevil :FIREdevil :FIREdevil :FIREdevil
:FIREdevil :FIREdevil :FIREdevil :FIREdevil:FIREdevil:FIREdevil:FIREdevil:

O KKK, wutever you say say say.......

Is this really necessary? Do I have to put up with this?

12-23-2005, 01:38 AM	#94
mooby Hug Anne Spyder Join Date: Mar 2005 Posts: 20,355	Re: Pro Bowl Bound - Samuels, Moss what they should've done is put cooley on the tight end ballot, then put sellers on the fullback ballot. I think sellers should've gone to the pro bowl, portis loves having him as the lead blocker, he's also a touchdown scoring machine inside the red zone, and he's been very productive for a fullback. __________________ Hail to the Football Team

12-23-2005, 07:37 PM	#98
That Guy Living Legend Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: VA Age: 41 Posts: 17,511	Re: Pro Bowl Bound - Samuels, Moss can we quit the pointless off topic sniping please?

12-23-2005, 11:32 PM	#102
TheMalcolmConnection I like big (_\|_)s. Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Lexington, Virginia Age: 42 Posts: 19,218	Re: Pro Bowl Bound - Samuels, Moss Yes! And those who know me, know that I normally am not someone who starts shit, but seriously, it's a FOOTBALL GAME, just f-ing CHILL. __________________ Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted.

Pro Bowl Bound - Samuels, Moss

Locker Room Main Forum