![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Yokohama, Japan
Posts: 4,525
|
Re: Redskins Offseason Thread
Quote:
-Brown is a beast, if he can fix his coverage flukes (and I think he has the skill to do so), he can be a really great player -I've said times and times again I think Foster is underrated, he's a true all around LB, more than decent coverage guy, solid tackler, good blitzer, tough mofo... love this player ! -Vigil played well last season, I'd be really curious to see what he can do behind a healthy and efficient DL ! -I respect Spaight because he's a good tackler, but that's about it, so far the game just seems to be a bit too fast for him (wether it's physical skill or reading plays...).
__________________
Derz Ambassaderz in the Land of the Rising Sun. Oui Monsieur. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: San Diego Ca
Posts: 5,354
|
Re: Redskins Offseason Thread
Quote:
Brown is awesome against the run. He isn't very good in coverage but I don't care, he needs to be going after the ball carrier at all times. Foster is coming back from a shoulder injury that put him on IR last year. It's risky banking on him playing 16 games this year so we need backups. I don't agree with what has been said about Spaight, Him and Brown are the only linebackers that made plays in the backfield. He has good speed and is aggressive. Now his angles to the ball carrier suck. he is too aggressive at time. He is a ST coverage guy and a last resort backup. Vigil will be coaching HS football in September but will be back around week8 when players start falling apart.. Buchanon will be our backup ILB and he is coming off an ACL injury, Yikes. We really need Foster and Nicholson to stay healthy. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Yokohama, Japan
Posts: 4,525
|
Re: Redskins Offseason Thread
Quote:
But I maintain that Vigil is a real solid back up and will do the job when asked, he has very decent physical skills and could be helped by good DL play. As for Foster, shoulders are a fragile articulation, but are fixed well. I dislocated mines 11 times (8 and 3) and have had absolutely no issue after my 2 surgeries, I came back stronger and more confident than before, started Boxing. I know a lot of guys that had the same surgery, including football players... and we didn't have access to the bests of bests (surgeons, rehab facilities etc...) like Foster does. Nothing to be worried about yet. As Chico said, don't forget about Josh "Hybrid" Harvey-Clemons, and 6th rounder Shaun Dion Hamilton whom Cooley thought pretty highly of in his breakdown.
__________________
Derz Ambassaderz in the Land of the Rising Sun. Oui Monsieur. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Warpath Hall of Fame
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 35,041
|
Re: Redskins Offseason Thread
Quote:
Because of Hamilton injury history, they might just bring him along, not show too much and stash on practice squad. Really just depends on his Health. IMO, its gonna be Virgil vs Spaight for one spot, unless Harvey-Clemons completely shits the bed preseason. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Jacksonville, Forida
Posts: 6,412
|
Re: Redskins Offseason Thread
Quote:
Vigil did a good job for us last season. I think he has a shot at making the season opening roster. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Yokohama, Japan
Posts: 4,525
|
Re: Redskins Offseason Thread
Quote:
__________________
Derz Ambassaderz in the Land of the Rising Sun. Oui Monsieur. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Jacksonville, Forida
Posts: 6,412
|
Re: Redskins Offseason Thread
I think Spaight's greatest liability is that he lacks the speed and quickness to start at the pro level. At his combine, he only ran a 4.88 forty and he had the slowest 3-Cone time in the LB group. I admire him because, although he lacks the some of the athletic gifts others at the pro level have been given, he has worked and studied very hard to earn his place on an NFL roster. Nevertheless, it looks like he may never be a starter because of his relative lack of speed and quickness and, as a reserve, he'll always be fighting for a roster spot over other players who are more athletic than himself.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 485
|
Re: Redskins Offseason Thread
Yeah as really despite having the lack of speed and quickness needed. He will always play the backup role unfortunately.
__________________
October Falls and Skies! |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Warpath Hall of Fame
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 35,041
|
Re: Redskins Offseason Thread
Don’t forget about Harvey-Clemons...
Let Darwinism take place for the depth ILB |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Warpath Hall of Fame
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UNITED STATES
Age: 38
Posts: 36,192
|
Re: Redskins Offseason Thread
Gonna leave this here,
Q Dunbar will be a pro bowler next season
__________________
“Mediocre people don’t like high achievers, and high achievers don’t like mediocre people.” ― Nick Saban |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: San Diego Ca
Posts: 5,354
|
Re: Redskins Offseason Thread
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Warpath Hall of Fame
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UNITED STATES
Age: 38
Posts: 36,192
|
Re: Redskins Offseason Thread
That is most athletes lol
__________________
“Mediocre people don’t like high achievers, and high achievers don’t like mediocre people.” ― Nick Saban |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Warpath Hall of Fame
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 35,041
|
Re: Redskins Offseason Thread
Jamison Crowder, Alex Smith should be productive for Redskins - Washington Redskins Blog- ESPN
Good read. Looking for crowder to bounce back |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Warpath Hall of Fame
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UNITED STATES
Age: 38
Posts: 36,192
|
Re: Redskins Offseason Thread
Quote:
__________________
“Mediocre people don’t like high achievers, and high achievers don’t like mediocre people.” ― Nick Saban |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 1,464
|
Re: Redskins Offseason Thread
Really? I think he'll be a 1,000 yard receiver this year.
__________________
Reserved for a witty signature. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|