Mark Sanchez at 13th?

GTripp0012 · 04-23-2009, 06:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

Latest rumor from where I sit has the Bucs and Skins very, very close to a deal that gets Campbell to Tampa and a low 2nd coming here (so low it's almost a third). Since the Bucs don't have a 2nd round pick, I don't believe they do anymore, I'm not sure how that deal happens exactly. Clearly there's another team involved that would get something from Tampa I presume. And over the next 48 hours the difference between "very, very close" and "dead in the water" is minimal.

All this depends of course on if they can get Sanchez (1st, 3rd, and 2nd in 2010 I think was what I last heard)

Otherwise it's Clay Matthews at 13 (or some USC LB)

Can an NFL team that just 8 months ago traded for Jason Taylor accept LESS compensation for their 27 year old QB? Stay tuned!

GTripp0012 · 04-23-2009, 06:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bigreds77

I hope Jason stays our QB. I live in Ohio about one hour from Pittsburgh & I have been a Skins fan for 37 years. Jason is he is a quality guy plus Joe Gibbs saw something in him.

To be fair, Joe Gibbs also saw something in Snyder.

SFREDSKIN · 04-23-2009, 06:38 PM

I'm so fed up with all the rumors and crap (if they are real) and draft the "Dirty Sanchez" and get rid of Campbell, that I hope it blows up in their face. Maybe the FO will learn their lesson for once and for all to quit ****ING with these team.

Beemnseven · 04-23-2009, 06:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bigreds77

I hope Jason stays our QB. I live in Ohio about one hour from Pittsburgh & I have been a Skins fan for 37 years. Jason is he is a quality guy plus Joe Gibbs saw something in him.

I love Joe Gibbs but this last part here doesn't mean very much. Gibbs was never a personnel guy. He was out of the game for 11 years, saw one workout of Campbell, and took the plunge.

Isn't it possible Gibbs was wrong about Jason Campbell?

drew54 · 04-23-2009, 06:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

Latest rumor from where I sit has the Bucs and Skins very, very close to a deal that gets Campbell to Tampa and a low 2nd coming here (so low it's almost a third). Since the Bucs don't have a 2nd round pick, I don't believe they do anymore, I'm not sure how that deal happens exactly. Clearly there's another team involved that would get something from Tampa I presume. And over the next 48 hours the difference between "very, very close" and "dead in the water" is minimal.

All this depends of course on if they can get Sanchez (1st, 3rd, and 2nd in 2010 I think was what I last heard)

Otherwise it's Clay Matthews at 13 (or some USC LB)

:vomit: - If it happens

- Next Year

SmootSmack · 04-23-2009, 06:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paintrain

Is that at #4 to Seattle? Assuming we do the TB deal, that's not terrible. We'd change QB and move into the 2nd round rather than the third. Same net number of picks and minus one next year. Of course I'd rather stand pat, trade up for Orapko at #9 or trade down but if it's gonna go down, I don't mind this deal.

Yeah Seattle, I heard a Moss (Santana, not Randy) to Titans 3rd round rumor as well. But it sounded kind of shaky.

drew54 · 04-23-2009, 06:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

Yeah Seattle, I heard a Moss (Santana, not Randy) to Titans 3rd round rumor as well. But it sounded kind of shaky.

So that would mean that all of our WR hopes would be placed on ARE, Thomas and Kelly. :confused-

REDSKIN1 · 04-23-2009, 06:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paintrain

How exactly? When we went up for Campbell we traded on the Thursday before into the bottom of the 1st and everyone knew we were targeting him. What would have happened if someone scooped him before us, how moronic would we have looked then?

I'm not talking about the trading up or trading down to acquire the player you want. What I'm talking about is the fact that when Joe Gibbs was here everything was done in a more professional manner. We didn't have the big top circus outside the front gate like we do now. There is nothing wrong with targeting your guy if that is who you want to get in the draft. All I'm saying is I wish we were a little more professional about the whole situation. (i.e. Patriots, Colts, Giants, Steelers, Eagles,etc.....)

SmootSmack · 04-23-2009, 06:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by drew54

So that would mean that all of our WR hopes would be placed on ARE, Thomas and Kelly. :confused-

Like I said, the rumor sounded very weak. Not even worth mentioning.

SmootSmack · 04-23-2009, 06:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by REDSKIN1

I'm not talking about the trading up or trading down to acquire the player you want. What I'm talking about is the fact that when Joe Gibbs was here everything was done in a more professional manner. We didn't have the big top circus outside the front gate like we do now. There is nothing wrong with targeting your guy if that is who you want to get in the draft. All I'm saying is I wish we were a little more professional about the whole situation. (i.e. Patriots, Colts, Giants, Steelers, Eagles,etc.....)

It's not the Redskins creating the big top circus, as much as it is the media...and for that, I apologize

CRedskinsRule · 04-23-2009, 07:19 PM

Smoot, how crazy is it at that place? I mean between all the rumors, and people trying to get the scoop, I imagine it is quite a wild coffee room right now.

53Fan · 04-23-2009, 07:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule

If I remember the projections right a lot of beginning mocks had all the OT's and DE's being gone by the time it got to our pick at 13. If, by feigning interest in Sanchez, we put pressure on at least one team ahead of us to get him instead of a DE/OT, then we have a better chance of having a player of need fall to us, plus if the 2nd of 3 first round qb's go, we increase the chance of a qb hungry team trading up to get Freeman at our spot.

So a perfect scenario now, may be: Denver, worried we were going to take Sanchez, drafts him at 12, then New York, thinking we are dissatisfied enough with Campbell to take Freeman, trades with us at 13 giving us there 1st and 2nd or 3rd to get Freeman. Thus we would have leveraged our supposed disinterest in JC to having multiple picks, and getting Mack, or another quality player that feels an area of need.

Good post and this is exactly what I'm hoping for. Vinny could surprise some people and this could actually happen. It makes the most sense, and is what I thought we were up to when all this crap about Sanchez started. Of course the more you hear, the harder it is to believe that we're not really after him, and that this is all just a smokescreen, but if it is.....well played FO.....well played.

GTripp0012 · 04-23-2009, 07:34 PM

Snyder should be leveraging the fact that we're going to suck next year into offering a 2010 third rounder instead of a second rounder.

MTK · 04-23-2009, 07:39 PM

Just saw a piece on SportsCenter about how risky drafting underclass QBs can be, followed up by Trent Dilfer raving about Sanchez being one of his "can't miss prospects".

I'm so confused. I'm excited about what Dilfer had to say, yet not thrilled about the idea of having a rookie under center.

GTripp0012 · 04-23-2009, 07:41 PM

Trent Dilfer is smarter than history.

04-23-2009, 06:38 PM	#738
SFREDSKIN Living Legend Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Pacifica, CA Posts: 15,164	Re: Mark Sanchez at 13th? I'm so fed up with all the rumors and crap (if they are real) and draft the "Dirty Sanchez" and get rid of Campbell, that I hope it blows up in their face. Maybe the FO will learn their lesson for once and for all to quit **ING with these team. __________________ Joe Gibbs- The best coach of all time, Lombardi trophy should be renamed Gibbs. Art Monk- Art was like an OL playing WR, doing the dirty work and not getting the glory. Darrell Green- Best DB ever. Purveyor of fine Filth**

04-23-2009, 07:19 PM	#746
CRedskinsRule Living Legend Join Date: Aug 2008 Age: 58 Posts: 21,703	Re: Mark Sanchez at 13th? Smoot, how crazy is it at that place? I mean between all the rumors, and people trying to get the scoop, I imagine it is quite a wild coffee room right now.

04-23-2009, 07:34 PM	#748
GTripp0012 Living Legend Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Evanston, IL Age: 37 Posts: 15,994	Re: Mark Sanchez at 13th? Snyder should be leveraging the fact that we're going to suck next year into offering a 2010 third rounder instead of a second rounder. __________________ according to a source with knowledge of the situation.

04-23-2009, 07:39 PM	#749
MTK \m/ Join Date: Feb 2004 Age: 52 Posts: 99,850	Re: Mark Sanchez at 13th? Just saw a piece on SportsCenter about how risky drafting underclass QBs can be, followed up by Trent Dilfer raving about Sanchez being one of his "can't miss prospects". I'm so confused. I'm excited about what Dilfer had to say, yet not thrilled about the idea of having a rookie under center. __________________ Support The Warpath! \| Warpath Shop

04-23-2009, 07:41 PM	#750
GTripp0012 Living Legend Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Evanston, IL Age: 37 Posts: 15,994	Re: Mark Sanchez at 13th? Trent Dilfer is smarter than history. __________________ according to a source with knowledge of the situation.

Mark Sanchez at 13th?

Locker Room Main Forum