Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Cowboys cut T.O.

Locker Room Main Forum


View Poll Results: T.O. is available, would you want him on the Redskins?
Yes 25 11.36%
No 195 88.64%
Voters: 220. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-06-2009, 08:18 PM   #1
SkinDogg
Special Teams
 
SkinDogg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 469
Re: Cowboys cut T.O.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pocket$ $traight View Post
Did Snyder want nothing to do with Owens or was that Gibbs?
Had to have been Gibbs. He had no patience for foolishness back in the 80s-90s (just ask Theismann), so he sure as h*ll didn't have it a few years ago.
SkinDogg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2009, 09:57 AM   #2
Pocket$ $traight
Registered User
 
Pocket$ $traight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fairfax, VA
Age: 49
Posts: 4,261
Re: Cowboys cut T.O.

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigHairedAristocrat View Post
Why would Snyder be salivating? Snyder wanted nothing to do with T.O. the last time he was on the market and we needed a WR more then than we do now. What makes you think Snyder would change his mind on T.O. and go after him now?
Does T.O. Make Sense for Skins? - Redskins Insider

"Whenever Rosenhaus has a disgruntled client, Redskins Park phone numbers are among the first he dials, league sources said. When Owens became available in 2006, former coach Joe Gibbs kept him out of the building because of his concerns about stirring strife in the locker room, team sources said. But Gibbs is back in NASCAR and Snyder and Cerrato still like those big receivers. Their attempts to provide big targets for quarterback Jason Campbell - and more options for Coach Jim Zorn as he installed his version of a spread offense - did not turn out well in 2008. Washington used its first three draft picks on wideouts Devin Thomas and Malcolm Kelly, and pass-catching tight end Fred Davis".

The paragraph above scares the crap out of me and I think it is 100% true.
Pocket$ $traight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2009, 09:14 AM   #3
CRedskinsRule
Living Legend
 
CRedskinsRule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 58
Posts: 21,703
Re: Cowboys cut T.O.

I think there is no way in h*** that we will, but if there was one move that could turn me off of the FO, signing TO would certainly be it.
CRedskinsRule is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2009, 09:23 AM   #4
12thMan
MVP
 
12thMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,460
Re: Cowboys cut T.O.

My logic is fairly simple. If we just parted ways with a 34 year old, soon to be 35 year old defensive end, who by all accounts is a stand-up guy. Why in the world would we sign a 35 year old wide receiver with baggage, a history of being divisive, and would command a nice chunck of money for a season or two?

The only way I see T.O. coming to D.C. is if our wideout corps has been depleted due to injuries come mid-season.
12thMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2009, 09:29 AM   #5
Larry Michael is Satan
Special Teams
 
Larry Michael is Satan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 123
Re: Cowboys cut T.O.

Miami? kidding.
I hope he gets the Barry Bonds treatment and nobody picks him up, and espn will have to find something else to talk about.
Larry Michael is Satan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2009, 09:28 AM   #6
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: Cowboys cut T.O.

If we hadn't made a commitment to two new WRs, plus a receiving TE last spring and if we still had Gibbs who could control TO I'd definitely consider him. But now, even with some doubts about Kelly's knees and a still new head coach in Zorn, along with TO's age, I don't think he's the right fit here. He can still play though.

Giants makes sense for him. Other teams that could make sense are New Orleans, Tennessee, and the Vikings. Maybe even the Ravens and Colts.
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2009, 09:35 AM   #7
gibbsisgod
Playmaker
 
gibbsisgod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: 129 W 81st street
Age: 46
Posts: 3,503
Re: Cowboys cut T.O.

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
If we hadn't made a commitment to two new WRs, plus a receiving TE last spring and if we still had Gibbs who could control TO I'd definitely consider him. But now, even with some doubts about Kelly's knees and a still new head coach in Zorn, along with TO's age, I don't think he's the right fit here. He can still play though.

Giants makes sense for him. Other teams that could make sense are New Orleans, Tennessee, and the Vikings. Maybe even the Ravens and Colts.
Didn't TO have a deal with the Ravens before he signed on to play with Philly? I think he refused to go so the deal fell through. I doubt they would take a chance on him this time around but the other teams do sound like reasonable options.
gibbsisgod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2009, 09:56 AM   #8
skinsfan69
Living Legend
 
skinsfan69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,461
Re: Cowboys cut T.O.

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
If we hadn't made a commitment to two new WRs, plus a receiving TE last spring and if we still had Gibbs who could control TO I'd definitely consider him. But now, even with some doubts about Kelly's knees and a still new head coach in Zorn, along with TO's age, I don't think he's the right fit here. He can still play though.

Giants makes sense for him. Other teams that could make sense are New Orleans, Tennessee, and the Vikings. Maybe even the Ravens and Colts.
Joe Gibbs and TO?? Yeah right.
skinsfan69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2009, 09:28 AM   #9
44ever
Registered User
 
44ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: The Fortune Teller
Posts: 2,512
Re: Cowboys cut T.O.

Everyone, If your sticking around waiting to see if TO becomes a Skin. Your wasting your time.

1) We did'nt want him when we could have got him
2) He wants to play in the NFC East not the other way around
3) He would greatly hinder the development of Campbell (Demanding ball hog)
4) We just signed DeAngelo Hall to a lot of $,$$$,$$$ we dont risk shutting him down
5) He is without a doubt still one of the best WR in the league IMO. But, his age will catch him this coming season. He missed a lot of passes in 08'
6) He would hinder Moss and cause disruption with our WR's
7) We don't need him.
8) He would be distracted by Homo at Cowgirls games
44ever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2009, 09:33 AM   #10
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,850
Re: Cowboys cut T.O.

Just stop, he's not coming here. And I doubt NY would want another head case WR either.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2009, 09:36 AM   #11
Pocket$ $traight
Registered User
 
Pocket$ $traight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fairfax, VA
Age: 49
Posts: 4,261
Re: Cowboys cut T.O.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72 View Post
Just stop, he's not coming here. And I doubt NY would want another head case WR either.
Matt, I hope that you are right. You trust the FO more than I do.
Pocket$ $traight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2009, 10:01 AM   #12
Skinny Tee
The Starter
 
Skinny Tee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Redskins Nation
Posts: 1,715
Re: Cowboys cut T.O.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72 View Post
Just stop, he's not coming here. And I doubt NY would want another head case WR either.
You said that Haynesworth isn't coming here.


There are some less than knowledgable Redskins fans at my work who LOVE that Owens is available and they are putting the B&G on him already. It's funny as hell and really scary at the same time.

Unforntunately, I imagine Dan Snyder is just like my co-workers.
__________________
Redskinsly,
_________Skinny Tee_________
Skinny Tee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2009, 10:04 AM   #13
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,850
Re: Cowboys cut T.O.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skinny Tee View Post
You said that Haynesworth isn't coming here.


There are some less than knowledgable Redskins fans at my work who LOVE that Owens is available and they are putting the B&G on him already. It's funny as hell and really scary at the same time.

Unforntunately, I imagine Dan Snyder is just like my co-workers.
I don't claim to be right all the time.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2009, 10:13 AM   #14
SFREDSKIN
Living Legend
 
SFREDSKIN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Pacifica, CA
Posts: 15,164
Re: Cowboys cut T.O.

Why not sign Marvin Harrison, instead of T.O.? What's the difference? One is a certified headcase, the other is the quiet assassin. If we haven't signed Marvin Harrison by now why would we sign TO?
__________________
Joe Gibbs- The best coach of all time, Lombardi trophy should be renamed Gibbs.

Art Monk- Art was like an OL playing WR, doing the dirty work and not getting the glory.

Darrell Green- Best DB ever.


Purveyor of fine Filth
SFREDSKIN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2009, 10:25 AM   #15
SBXVII
Franchise Player
 
SBXVII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
Re: Cowboys cut T.O.

Quote:
Originally Posted by SFREDSKIN View Post
Why not sign Marvin Harrison, instead of T.O.? What's the difference? One is a certified headcase, the other is the quiet assassin. If we haven't signed Marvin Harrison by now why would we sign TO?
Cause if I'm not mistaken Harrison is like 5-11 which puts him right in company or close to it with Moss and El. We need an elite tall WR with some weight behind him not a small WR like we already have. I thought of Harrison also until I looked at his size and weight. I also looked at Holt but I thought he got picked back up by SL. He's also very old.
SBXVII is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 1.19639 seconds with 11 queries