Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Sam Howell Traded

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-15-2024, 02:38 PM   #61
Meks
Pro Bowl
 
Meks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: South Jersey
Age: 39
Posts: 5,524
Re: Sam Howell Traded

Definitely a bit scared.
__________________
R.I.P #21SEAN TAYLOR
Meks is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 03-15-2024, 03:07 PM   #62
jamf
Pro Bowl
 
jamf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: San Diego Ca
Posts: 5,229
Re: Sam Howell Traded

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsnut View Post
This is what I think:
A full assessment of the top 3 QBs in the draft have been completed. The new FO is Rick solid on who they will pick at 2. They will not move up. They are completely sold on Maye or Daniels as our franchise QB.
Why do I suggest this?
If they weren't sure, and wanted to hedge their bets, they keep a cheap developmental piece in Howell. They traded him and signed a typical lame backup.
What about a trade up?
It is still possible, but if they weren't Rick solid on #2, no way they would have made those moves. If they are all chips in in #2, why would they trade Anything to go to #1, when we need 2 Tackles? Makes no sense.
For such a strategy as conservative with all the free agents signings, the Quarterback move was all chips in on #2. This is a high confidence move
An outrageous possibility would be they already have a vet trade tagged in writing for our QB starter, but that is hard to fathom.
So the good news here is, the new FO has done extensive homework and has no doubts who their next QB is, anything they say to the contrary is BS.
I am glad, but a bit scared
My dick gets rick solid every time I talk about Howell.

Sorry, couldn't let that autocorrect slide!

Things are even simpler than that.
Howell is the ex girlfriend that mom loved.
We will have a new love interest next month and don't need mom screwing up thanksgiving by comparing the ex to the new GF. Relationship is over.

Shular/Frerotte
RG3/Cousins

We can get a new side piece in the draft to go along with our top pick.
jamf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2024, 04:00 PM   #63
rocnrik
Playmaker
 
rocnrik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,614
Re: Sam Howell Traded

i will say if they draft CW you won't hear anything from me .. i'll be elsewhere. Jamf hated Sam from day one ..and he can feel anyway he wants and voice it all he wants .. good for Jamf he has his convictions and stayed true !! i have same about CW and i don't care how well he plays .. i can't stand him and never will ! so i hope it's Daniels !
rocnrik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2024, 04:30 PM   #64
skinsfaninok
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
skinsfaninok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UNITED STATES
Age: 37
Posts: 36,074
Re: Sam Howell Traded

Quote:
Originally Posted by rocnrik View Post
i will say if they draft CW you won't hear anything from me .. i'll be elsewhere. Jamf hated Sam from day one ..and he can feel anyway he wants and voice it all he wants .. good for Jamf he has his convictions and stayed true !! i have same about CW and i don't care how well he plays .. i can't stand him and never will ! so i hope it's Daniels !
If he comes in and wins ROY and we win 11 games you will change tune lol
__________________
“Mediocre people don’t like high achievers, and high achievers don’t like mediocre people.”
― Nick Saban
skinsfaninok is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2024, 05:52 PM   #65
Chief X_Phackter
Pro Bowl
 
Chief X_Phackter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Lakewood, CO
Posts: 5,568
Re: Sam Howell Traded

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsnut View Post
This is what I think:
A full assessment of the top 3 QBs in the draft have been completed. The new FO is Rick solid on who they will pick at 2. They will not move up. They are completely sold on Maye or Daniels as our franchise QB.
Why do I suggest this?
If they weren't sure, and wanted to hedge their bets, they keep a cheap developmental piece in Howell. They traded him and signed a typical lame backup.
What about a trade up?
It is still possible, but if they weren't Rick solid on #2, no way they would have made those moves. If they are all chips in in #2, why would they trade Anything to go to #1, when we need 2 Tackles? Makes no sense.
For such a strategy as conservative with all the free agents signings, the Quarterback move was all chips in on #2. This is a high confidence move
An outrageous possibility would be they already have a vet trade tagged in writing for our QB starter, but that is hard to fathom.
So the good news here is, the new FO has done extensive homework and has no doubts who their next QB is, anything they say to the contrary is BS.
I am glad, but a bit scared
This is all well and good until some other team trades up to number one and picks the quarterback they are Rick solid on.
Chief X_Phackter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2024, 06:48 PM   #66
EARTHQUAKE2689
You did WHAT?!?
 
EARTHQUAKE2689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: In The Kitchen With Dyna.
Age: 35
Posts: 14,160
Re: Sam Howell Traded

Quote:
Originally Posted by Meks View Post
Definitely a bit scared.
Why? He wasnt Brady
__________________
https://open.spotify.com/artist/1NG9zNxqMP8cYNP72QqUQT

Shameless self-promotion. It is what it is.
EARTHQUAKE2689 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2024, 07:05 AM   #67
That Guy
Living Legend
 
That Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 41
Posts: 17,551
Re: Sam Howell Traded

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chief X_Phackter View Post
This is all well and good until some other team trades up to number one and picks the quarterback they are Rick solid on.
I assume they're happy with at least 2 players, so it doesn't matter what happens at 1.
That Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2024, 10:30 AM   #68
Meks
Pro Bowl
 
Meks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: South Jersey
Age: 39
Posts: 5,524
Re: Sam Howell Traded

Quote:
Originally Posted by EARTHQUAKE2689 View Post
Why? He wasnt Brady
It's always gonna be unnerving as fans when your #2 pick has to ball out or you'll be fielding...... Marietta. Not enough return for Sam who I'd put out there over MM every day and twice on Sundays.

I don't think the hype is real ok these top 3 qbs, either, like most other years, qbs over drafted and over hyped.

Is what it is, hope for the best.
__________________
R.I.P #21SEAN TAYLOR
Meks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2024, 11:05 AM   #69
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 51
Posts: 99,387
Re: Sam Howell Traded

After 17 games Sam got us to the #2 pick.

I wouldn’t be scared.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2024, 11:10 AM   #70
Chief X_Phackter
Pro Bowl
 
Chief X_Phackter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Lakewood, CO
Posts: 5,568
Re: Sam Howell Traded

Quote:
Originally Posted by That Guy View Post
I assume they're happy with at least 2 players, so it doesn't matter what happens at 1.
Maybe, but all 3 of them are so different from each other. It doesn't make a ton of sense that they would just be happy to settle for whoever is there. It's possible, but I think I would rather them be locked in on one guy because he fits what they want to do.

Wish the draft was this weekend...
Chief X_Phackter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2024, 11:30 AM   #71
Chief X_Phackter
Pro Bowl
 
Chief X_Phackter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Lakewood, CO
Posts: 5,568
Re: Sam Howell Traded

Quote:
Originally Posted by MTK View Post
After 17 games Sam got us to the #2 pick.

I wouldn’t be scared.
In my opinion EB & RR got us to the # 2 pick.

The compensation we received for SH was pretty decent though. I don't hate the trade.
Chief X_Phackter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2024, 11:56 AM   #72
Meks
Pro Bowl
 
Meks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: South Jersey
Age: 39
Posts: 5,524
Re: Sam Howell Traded

Quote:
Originally Posted by MTK View Post
After 17 games Sam got us to the #2 pick.

I wouldn’t be scared.
Yea let's not pretend he acted solely in that wonderful season we had lol.. but more so I'm taking howell>MM ... MM being the security blanket is what's most scary.
__________________
R.I.P #21SEAN TAYLOR
Meks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2024, 12:03 PM   #73
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 51
Posts: 99,387
Re: Sam Howell Traded

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chief X_Phackter View Post
In my opinion EB & RR got us to the # 2 pick.

The compensation we received for SH was pretty decent though. I don't hate the trade.
Ron, EB, Sam, they all played a role.

I get that circumstance weren’t ideal for Sam, but they rarely are and you have to make do with what you’ve got. He took way too many sacks and threw too many picks, just too many negative plays. I like him and think he can play a little but he’s probably best suited as a backup and spot starter. Too many limitations in his game that get exposed over 17 games. I thought the trade compensation was more than fair.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2024, 12:43 PM   #74
simbosargos75
Special Teams
 
simbosargos75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 266
Re: Sam Howell Traded

Quote:
Originally Posted by Meks View Post
Definitely a bit scared.
nvm
__________________
--Hail to the Redskins

--On Wisconsin
simbosargos75 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2024, 02:22 PM   #75
Chief X_Phackter
Pro Bowl
 
Chief X_Phackter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Lakewood, CO
Posts: 5,568
Re: Sam Howell Traded

Quote:
Originally Posted by MTK View Post
Ron, EB, Sam, they all played a role.

I get that circumstance weren’t ideal for Sam, but they rarely are and you have to make do with what you’ve got. He took way too many sacks and threw too many picks, just too many negative plays. I like him and think he can play a little but he’s probably best suited as a backup and spot starter. Too many limitations in his game that get exposed over 17 games. I thought the trade compensation was more than fair.
This has been a consistent issue with him, even before the NFL. The O-line wasn't great, and the play calling was even worse, but you would think if there was ever a season he could shake the propensity to hold onto the ball too long, it would have been last season.
Chief X_Phackter is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.33524 seconds with 11 queries