![]() |
|
|
#46 | |
|
Another Year, another mess.
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,581
|
Re: 2012 NFL Draft-QB Prospects (Chapter 5)
Quote:
__________________
That got ugly fast |
|
|
|
| Advertisements |
|
|
#47 | |
|
Mr. Brightside
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Leesburg, VA
Age: 39
Posts: 4,453
|
Re: 2012 NFL Draft-QB Prospects (Chapter 5)
Quote:
__________________
"I don't care what nobody say I'm a be me, stay hood stay real, cause I'm out here grindin'" -Joe Gibbs
|
|
|
|
|
|
#48 | |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: 2 Minutes away from Fedex Field, Maryland
Posts: 363
|
Re: 2012 NFL Draft-QB Prospects (Chapter 5)
Quote:
__________________
Skins, '04 - Forever. |
|
|
|
|
|
#49 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: 2012 NFL Draft-QB Prospects (Chapter 5)
If I was in charge, I would trade up to third overall, assuming I could get a decent deal from the Vikings (no 2013 first rounder). Doing so would force the Rams' hand. Sure they still could trade the pick to someone for Griffin, or then they could take Griffin themselves, but I'd be totally okay with having Justin Blackmon or Matt Kalil as a contingency plan. Third overall is a good spot to be in this draft.
I think, ultimately, it would be a much cheaper way of landing Robert Griffin. The Browns aren't going to move up for him. The Dolphins or Seahawks might, but I think the number one most likely scenario where Griffin isn't around at number two is that the Rams take him. I think if he's sitting there at fourth overall, Cleveland probably takes him. But I think they will be extremely hesitant to go up. Obviously this only matters if there is a heavy bidding war for the second overall pick and relatively nothing for the third overall pick. It makes a lot more sense in that case to be in the third slot.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
|
#50 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Norfolk, Va (OV)
Posts: 1,566
|
Re: 2012 NFL Draft-QB Prospects (Chapter 5)
Drafting RG3 compensates for a lack talent all around. That's why he's valued with a team like this.
__________________
'Any NFL team will win with RG3. Imagine how exciting it will be watching him do it.' |
|
|
|
|
#51 | |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Lakewood, CO
Posts: 5,644
|
Re: 2012 NFL Draft-QB Prospects (Chapter 5)
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#52 | |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Lakewood, CO
Posts: 5,644
|
Re: 2012 NFL Draft-QB Prospects (Chapter 5)
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#53 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 413
|
Re: 2012 NFL Draft-QB Prospects (Chapter 5)
No way would I trade with the Vikings which would open up an opportunity for the Cleveland Browns to trade up with St.Louis and steal our QB. Yeah I said it, our QB
I'm content with Bruce giving up 2 1st rounders. That's the price you have to pay for a franchise QB in today's passing league.
|
|
|
|
|
#54 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: 2012 NFL Draft-QB Prospects (Chapter 5)
Quote:
By trading up to no. 3 a few days before the draft, it does define your intentions re: RG3, but with Cleveland sitting at no. 4, you're really not changing the market any. You just position yourself for a quarterback while taking the Rams out of their power position with that pick. They can take best offer for the pick or they can select Griffin themselves, but knowing very well that the Redskins (and Browns) are now direct competition to them for guys they want (Griffin, Kalil, Blackmon), it should make the Rams a lot more hesitant to trade the pick. By trading up to three a couple days before the draft, you're basically beating everyone to the punch and killing the market for the Rams at no. 2.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
|
|
#55 |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 657
|
Re: 2012 NFL Draft-QB Prospects (Chapter 5)
Ladies and Gentlemen, Chandler Harnish from his senior year.
I know it's a highlight tape, but impressive for a guy nobody is talking about yet.
__________________
One of Canada's two Redskins fans. Last edited by IrMitchell; 01-13-2012 at 06:13 AM. |
|
|
|
|
#56 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Holland, Michigan
Posts: 5,741
|
Re: 2012 NFL Draft-QB Prospects (Chapter 5)
I like Harnish. If for some reason we dont get a QB in the first round I'd take a shot at him later.
__________________
REDSKINS FAN SINCE 1968 |
|
|
|
|
#57 | |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Age: 48
Posts: 1,851
|
Quote:
__________________
Catch me on YouTube ! http://www.youtube.com/user/DowntimeRB?feature=mhw5 The "punishment" by the league : "It's like getting a ticket for going too fast on a road a week ago and they changed the speed limit today" |
|
|
|
|
|
#58 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Schertz, Tx
Age: 46
Posts: 3,224
|
Re: 2012 NFL Draft-QB Prospects (Chapter 5)
I guess it makes sense to trade for #3 pick since it will be cheaper, but better have a backup plan for QB just in case some leap frogs us or rams take him. Cause after luck and griffin no other QB IMO is starter material in the draft. So if they go this route then they better have signed a veteran QB just in case.
|
|
|
|
|
#59 | |
|
\m/
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,846
|
Re: 2012 NFL Draft-QB Prospects (Chapter 5)
If RG3 is their guy, just trade up to #2 and grab him. Don't F around with the possibility of not getting him. Go big or go home.
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#60 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,766
|
Re: 2012 NFL Draft-QB Prospects (Chapter 5)
So, when are these trades actually agreed upon? Is it the day of the draft, minutes before the draft pick comes up, or is weeks prior? I've always assumed these trades are presented right before the team is on the clock for that valued pick. I'm sure they are presented offers from the other teams in advance before draft day, but I'm assuming they don't show their hand until they actually go to pick.
IF it's a case where nothing is set in stone until the team is on the clock, this is interesting to me. For starters, it's gutsy to just trade up to #3. You're assuming Seattle or Miami don't have anything substantial to offer to leap frog all the way up to #2, and you're probably right. BUT, you still have Cleveland, who seems to be the direct competition for the RG III sweepstakes. They have two number one picks in this year's draft. It wouldn't take much for them just to leap up to #2. And, I'm wondering if Cleveland would even HAVE to give up one of those first round picks? I mean, nothing would virtually change for the Rams, because if their pick is Blackmon or Kalil, then those guys are still going to be there at #4 (since the 'skins pick RG III at #3.) So, they might be willing to take a lesser trade with the Browns, move down to #4, and maybe the Browns give away second round picks? I guess the advantages are that the Rams give up virtually nothing by moving down, and they would pick up extra good picks in this year's draft instead of having to wait for future picks, even though those picks could be first rounders. It's a difference between having that juicy double whopper now or waiting later for the New York strip. If the Browns have no intentions of moving up to #2 at all, then yes, the best move for the Redskins is to move up to #3, give up less, still get RG III. All I know is, I want a QB that can start from day one, and the only two I feel that are capable of that are Luck and Griffin.
__________________
"Fire Up That Diesel!" |
|
|
![]() |
|
|