![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 754
|
re: Hankerson/Golston Placed on IR; Darrion Scott and Stallworth Re-Signed
Disagree. I might be overlooking something big though (and it being a different sport isn't overlooked), what do you see that makes this apples to oranges?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,471
|
re: Hankerson/Golston Placed on IR; Darrion Scott and Stallworth Re-Signed
Size and rabidity of the fanbase, value of the franchise, spotlight on the sport as a whole...
__________________
"All natural institutions of churches, whether Jewish, Christian, or Turkish, appear to me no other than human inventions, set up to terrify and enslave mankind, and monopolize power and profit." Thomas Paine |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
re: Hankerson/Golston Placed on IR; Darrion Scott and Stallworth Re-Signed
Quote:
The Caps made as high stakes a move as the Redskins have ever made in signing Jaromir Jagr to, I believe, the biggest contract in NHL history. And he was a colossal failure. But does anyone talk about that? No, yet even when the Redskins were making playoff runs in 05 and 07 fans couldn't let go of 5 to 10 year old FA moves. There's also no farm system in the NFL. Redskins can't draft Kevin Barnes and let him play several games a year against other professionals in Hershey, PA for a few years before calling him up. I know Leonsis, I like Leonsis. I think he's done a great job in turning the Caps around (though they still fail tremendously come playoff time). But I just don't think it's so simple as to say what works for the Caps works for the Redskins.
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Warpath Hall of Fame
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 35,037
|
re: Hankerson/Golston Placed on IR; Darrion Scott and Stallworth Re-Signed
Quote:
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler He Gets Us |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 754
|
Re: Hankerson/Golston Placed on IR; Darrion Scott and Stallworth Re-Signed
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Hankerson/Golston Placed on IR; Darrion Scott and Stallworth Re-Signed
Quote:
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,052
|
re: Hankerson/Golston Placed on IR; Darrion Scott and Stallworth Re-Signed
Quote:
I think we're like Oakland in 2009. Awful quarterback and a not too many good players elsewhere. We will need to make next year's draft count.
__________________
Analysis using datasets (aka stats) is an attempt at reverse-engineering a player's "goodness". Virtuosity remembered, douchebaggery forgotten. The ideal character profile shoved down modern Western men and women's throats is Don Juan. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Detroit area
Posts: 4,153
|
re: Hankerson/Golston Placed on IR; Darrion Scott and Stallworth Re-Signed
Yeah the Caps have a concrete plan in place to be a winner because they have to win to make $$$$$$$$, while Snyder and co just go with the wind. THe Caps have to win to keep the seats filled. Snyder has his team followed by a bunch of us masochists that come back for his BS every year, fill the stands, etc. I have a much better shot at marrying a Victoria's Secret model than the Skins have of making the playoffs in the next decade. And by the way, I don't buy that he was a big fan stuff. That is his cover for acting like a fool, while in reality he doesn't really give a damn about winning. The guy isn't a fool, he knows he can jerk us around and make a gazillion dollars no matter what. He vyes for most lucrative sports franchise on the planet with his bud Jerry Jones every year in Forbes, and he keeps the profits growing. All he has to do is keep new, fresh faces coming in every 2-3 years to get the mob to think " Yeah, this is it!!"SB here we come!!!!!!! Yeah, we finally had a decent draft, the best draft since we got Champ, but now our stud T is oft injured and might be suspended for failing a drug test. Oh goody!!!!! Brown is going to be oft injured as well, akin to Tre Johnson at the end of his stint with us. Our secondary sucks, our best LB has only 3 years left tops, and our only hope is that we draft the right rookie QB. Even that doesn't quarantee us anything.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Hug Anne Spyder
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,577
|
re: Hankerson/Golston Placed on IR; Darrion Scott and Stallworth Re-Signed
What the f man. Damnit! How are you supposed to see what your young players got if they can't get on the field. That sucks hard, but oh well. Let's hope he doesn't pull a Landry and decide not to get surgery on it if it would probably be better if he did get surgery on it. Either way, I hope he works his ass off so he can keep learning and getting better next year.
__________________
Hail to the Football Team |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
|
re: Hankerson/Golston Placed on IR; Darrion Scott and Stallworth Re-Signed
Lol, OMG, just when there was any semblance of positivity being able to watch a rookie WR stepping up and learning to play in the NFL...... He gets a season ending injury.
Soooo who does the team bring in? Put on the PS? Do they move the other rookie up from the PS? Harrumph. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Playmaker
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,159
|
re: Hankerson/Golston Placed on IR; Darrion Scott and Stallworth Re-Signed
Quote:
They started the season with 9 guys on the roster/practice squad who were WRs. Now they are out signing guys off the couch (Anderson) to plug in. If the 9 guys they had on the roster/practice squad were not satisfactory, they why were they there and why did the "talent search" not begin earlier? As I recall, the Redskins brought in a cavalcade of running backs last year toward the end of the season and none of them were particularly impressive - - as should be expected when they have been out of the league for the majority of a season. So, why is a guy that no one has wanted for half a year better than what you have on the roster/practice squad? Is not not an indictment of the folks who built the roster/practice squad? BTW, Terrell Owens remains unsigned. He is a pain in the ass of astronomical proportions - - but even on a recentl;y rehabbed knee, he is probably better than anyone on the roster now. Please do not let that tempt the Skins' braintrust into contacting him...
__________________
The Sports Curmudgeon www.sportscurmudgeon.com But don't get me wrong, I love sports... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 825
|
re: Hankerson/Golston Placed on IR; Darrion Scott and Stallworth Re-Signed
Can you say cursed!! Finally we get a rookie wr who shows he might breakout and what happens...season ending injury. Can it get any worse?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
|
re: Hankerson/Golston Placed on IR; Darrion Scott and Stallworth Re-Signed
Please don't tell me Stallworth will be resigned.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Gamebreaker
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 14,602
|
re: Hankerson/Golston Placed on IR; Darrion Scott and Stallworth Re-Signed
I guess this is karma for us enjoying all those injuries to the Giants squad.
__________________
"So let me get this straight. We have the event of the year on TV with millions watching around the world... and people want a punt, pass, and kick competition to be the halftime entertainment?? Folks, don't quit your day jobs."- Matty |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,900
|
re: Hankerson/Golston Placed on IR; Darrion Scott and Stallworth Re-Signed
What worries me is, initially it looked like he would fall down early to avoid a hit... What do you think he is going to do now that he has been injured? I'm worried he is going to be playing scared next year...
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|