![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Our Current status at the WR position
Quote:
I think when we get close to the goal line, Moss is our best route runner. I think thats where his value still lies. In the rest of the field, there's just not enough attention to detail to be effective. For the record, I would take Santana Moss on my team 100/100 times over a guy like Brandon Marshall, a headcase who does everything worse than Moss. That doesn't mean I think Moss is good enough to take us where we want to go. He's fine for where we are...but again, his contract is expiring.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,323
|
Re: Our Current status at the WR position
Quote:
Add a returning Malcolm Kelly and a developing Austin i think our WRs corps is one area that we can leave alone while we fix other areas. Letting Tana walk is digging an hole to fill a hole. Imo the struggles in our passing game are less b/c of Tana then of misuse of personnel, QB play and coaching/gameplanning/playcalling. o Joey Galloway slowed/stunted the development of several players Joey Galloway and Tana often ran in breaking routes that require physicality like slants and digs and square ins o Fred Davis imo was woefully underused he was the most efficient pass catcher on the team yet was barely on the field more then our ineffective 3rd WRs and also received fewer targets then our 3rd WRs and our most of RBs and FB. o our QB and OC couldn't get on the same page which limited the passing offense o very limited use of the screen game o lack of creativity (we couldn't get Tana/Banks the ball in space?) I think our passing game has enough talent to be competitive especially if Kelly, Austin and Banks can be worked into the offense. (imagine what the Pats would do w/ a player like Banks?) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Herndon,Virginia
Posts: 83
|
Re: Our Current status at the WR position
Malcolm Kelly had his chance.he sucks! keep the others and add a FA or draft someone in the latter rounds.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Our Current status at the WR position
Quote:
I think Moss was a nice system fit this year, I just happen to feel that he did about as well as he could have given his skill set. Letting Moss walk isn't really creating a new hole because an upgrade is already a need, but more directly, he's not under contract for next season. Put in perspective, we could let Moss walk and sign James Jones (GB) and place him in the same role, and we'd more or less have the same strengths and weaknesses with a younger player. Not advocating Jones here or that you'd throw a guy like Jones 145 balls in a season...but of course we shouldn't do the same with Moss again. I think Moss will get picked up fairly quickly when he hits the market because he's still a very good route runner and he's good around the goal line and he's tough to tackle in space and that's all very valuable receiver stuff. I just don't think it makes much sense for the Redskins to bring him back. I don't see a contract extension to be filling any sort of hole in our offense, instead it just holds the status quo. I would not scramble frantically to replace Santana Moss' role in the offense, I think it opens up more natural looks for guys like Davis.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Martinsburg, WV
Posts: 3,881
|
Re: Our Current status at the WR position
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: NJ
Posts: 886
|
Re: Our Current status at the WR position
Current Status: We need another WR.
Moss needs a new deal. Santana still has a couple decent years as a roleplayer, he still can play at a high level. He had a decent year actually. McNabb underfire all year still being semi consistent and then stepping up as Grossman came in as well. Theres gotta be someone in FA thats a bargain who can make some plays . We need at least 2 big FA pickups and a huge draft this year.
__________________
ALL HAIL |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
\m/
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,851
|
Re: Our Current status at the WR position
A WR that finished 3rd overall in catches and 10th in yardage, was only slightly better than our 31st ranked D? I know it's hard to compare one guy to an entire unit, but I'm still struggling to make sense of that logic.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Our Current status at the WR position
Quote:
Better than say, 3rd in catches, 20th in yardage. Worse than 3rd in catches, 6th in yardage. I don't want to just throw out a yards per target figure, because it's apples and oranges. Moss used to be let loose deep more frequently, and used to average around 9 ish yards per target. This year, he was around seven and a half. That's predominantly a change in role. It's also not very good. Percy Harvin got 8 YPT this year in pretty much the same role. Lance Moore got about 8.1 YPT. Mike Thomas was in the same range. Ditto Anquan Boldin. I'm stretching the definition of a similar receiver, but Moss did a new role and did not do it all that well. And we didn't move the ball as an offense and score consistently. So we took away some of Santana Moss' deep running because this role is more important for the offense. He's doing the role...well, I think we can agree he didn't do great. I also realize you can't replace him with Terrence Austin and get the same production, but I'm not suggesting that we just go and do that.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 3,543
|
Re: Our Current status at the WR position
Walterfootball has AJ Green going #1 overall now.
__________________
Sean Taylor #21 a Redskin forever... Team Heinicke Fan Club punch it in - CEO SkinzWin - President FrenchSkin - VP of Global Operations ODUsmitty - Director of Cheerleader Fulfillment Meks - Director of Marketing |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
|
Re: Our Current status at the WR position
In any event we need to upgrade. Either through FA or draft or both.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Scottsdale, Arizona
Age: 44
Posts: 623
|
Re: Our Current status at the WR position
i understand the concerns regarding Moss and I agree that he is very shaky at times and def fumbles/drops passes quite a bit. However as a #2 going down the road I LOVE the idea of having Moss around for years to come ... this guy would go bananas against lesser DB's ... think about it .. if say we had a Reggie Wayne (FA) or made a run at Vincent Jackson .. that would open the door for Moss, give AA a chance to shine not to mention defense's still have to figure out how to stop Cooley/Davis ... KEEP SANTANA !
__________________
"F*CK THE DALLAS JUMBOTRON" NFC EAST CHAMPS RG3 will be back & #12 can run the show until hes ready.We are young w depth. 23,59,89 will all be back.Alfred Morris aka Diesel Hybrid ! @DCtoAZ81 ...2013 NFC CHAMPS |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Martinsburg, WV
Posts: 3,881
|
Re: Our Current status at the WR position
I think our WR core is the best it's been in years. We need to keep/bring back what we had this year for next year.
If anything. I would move Fred Davis to a more WR role. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 573
|
Re: Our Current status at the WR position
Fix the offensive line first, then get a wr.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|