Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Taylor to Return w/o Restructure or Paycut

Locker Room Main Forum


View Poll Results: Keeping Jason Taylor at his current $8.5M salary is...
A good move, thumbs up 37 32.17%
A bad move, I hate it 78 67.83%
Voters: 115. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-23-2009, 01:10 AM   #1
Paintrain
Pro Bowl
 
Paintrain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Age: 54
Posts: 5,006
Re: Taylor to Return w/o Restructure or Paycut

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72 View Post
If we do indeed bring him back it's a complete waste of time unless we turn him loose and let him do what he does best.
Exactly.. We've got to let players do what they do best rather than try to cram them into fitting a scheme that doesn't fit what they do best.

After the '07 season everyone down in Miami was talking about what a bust Joey Porter was and he was a waste of money and a position. The new coaching staff put him place to succeed and he put up numbers similar to his career previously in '08.

Putting Taylor in a rover DE/WLB position and let him go after the passer gives him and us the best usage of his abilities.
__________________
Paintrain's Redskins Fandom
1981-2014

I'm not dead but this team is dead to me...but now that McCloughan is here they may have new life!

Jay Gruden = Zorny McSpurrier
Kirk Cousins = Next Grossman
Paintrain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2009, 12:23 AM   #2
Eknox
Impact Rookie
 
Eknox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Flint,Mi
Posts: 528
Re: Taylor to Return w/o Restructure or Paycut

We should move him to right DE
Eknox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2009, 12:29 AM   #3
The Goat
Pro Bowl
 
The Goat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
Re: Taylor to Return w/o Restructure or Paycut

... and btw if Carter gets moved to LDE I hope Blache or someone suggests he let his body fat to explode beyond 3% LOL. I guess he runs around 255 lbs during the season and I don't see any reason he couldn't pack on a few more pounds.
__________________
24-34
The Goat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2009, 07:09 AM   #4
CRedskinsRule
Living Legend
 
CRedskinsRule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 58
Posts: 21,701
Re: Taylor to Return w/o Restructure or Paycut

I voted that I hate the move even though I like that he is returning. I hate that they could not find a way to reduce his price tag.
CRedskinsRule is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2009, 08:06 AM   #5
Daseal
Puppy Kicker
 
Daseal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Age: 42
Posts: 8,341
Re: Taylor to Return w/o Restructure or Paycut

I think the injury last season really hampered him. I think his play early and late in the year was pretty good. I bet JT comes back and earns his Salary.

Paintrain -- what makes you think JT at WLB is "what he does best." As far as I know, he has never played that position and has always played DE throughout his career. Can he run? I know he's a very tall TE -- how big of a liability in coverage would he be? And I really don't see much attacking, especially from LBs coming from Blache.
__________________
Best. Player. Available.
Daseal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2009, 08:33 AM   #6
Paintrain
Pro Bowl
 
Paintrain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Age: 54
Posts: 5,006
Re: Taylor to Return w/o Restructure or Paycut

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daseal View Post
I think the injury last season really hampered him. I think his play early and late in the year was pretty good. I bet JT comes back and earns his Salary.

Paintrain -- what makes you think JT at WLB is "what he does best." As far as I know, he has never played that position and has always played DE throughout his career. Can he run? I know he's a very tall TE -- how big of a liability in coverage would he be? And I really don't see much attacking, especially from LBs coming from Blache.
Well I probably stated that wrong. What he does best is play attack the QB which he can do best from the left DE position or WLB. In our defense, as constructed we don't have an open position for him where he'd be most effective. I guess I am saying the same as Matty, if he's going to be here let's all hope that he's going to be used to maximize his talents vs trying to fit him into the system.
__________________
Paintrain's Redskins Fandom
1981-2014

I'm not dead but this team is dead to me...but now that McCloughan is here they may have new life!

Jay Gruden = Zorny McSpurrier
Kirk Cousins = Next Grossman
Paintrain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2009, 08:32 AM   #7
SBXVII
Franchise Player
 
SBXVII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
Re: Taylor to Return w/o Restructure or Paycut

"Before the trade was done, he was asked if he would play out his two years left on the contract, and he said, 'Absolutely,' " Wichard said. "They asked for a two-year commitment from Jason. They gave up a lot to get him, so I understand why they did, and we gave them that commitment. That was the deal, so there's nothing new there. They weren't doing it for one year and we weren't doing it for one year. It was two years on both sides."

Gotta love is agent for trying to keep Taylor from getting the axe for CAP reasons. LOL.
SBXVII is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2009, 08:36 AM   #8
redsk1
The Starter
 
redsk1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,351
Re: Taylor to Return w/o Restructure or Paycut

The guy is a HOF player who had devastating injuries last year. If healthy JT could be a real beast for us. He's in great shape and is only 34. Come on guys, most were excited about this move last year. It's his contract. It's what we accepted.
redsk1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2009, 08:58 AM   #9
Paintrain
Pro Bowl
 
Paintrain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Age: 54
Posts: 5,006
Re: Taylor to Return w/o Restructure or Paycut

Quote:
Originally Posted by redsk1 View Post
The guy is a HOF player who had devastating injuries last year. If healthy JT could be a real beast for us. He's in great shape and is only 34. Come on guys, most were excited about this move last year. It's his contract. It's what we accepted.
Plus, regardless of how he plays this year he's going to be off the books at the end of the season. It's not a classic Snyder move where he'd be restructured for 2 more seasons to spread the cap hit.
__________________
Paintrain's Redskins Fandom
1981-2014

I'm not dead but this team is dead to me...but now that McCloughan is here they may have new life!

Jay Gruden = Zorny McSpurrier
Kirk Cousins = Next Grossman
Paintrain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2009, 09:00 AM   #10
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: Taylor to Return w/o Restructure or Paycut

I like that he's coming back for another season.

-It's not up to him to decide to restructure. The Redskins should go to Taylor and his agent if they want to restructure, not the other way around. And, I don't consider myself a cap expert, but I'm sure there are good reasons for not restructuring his deal where it potentially hurts us more in the long run.

-He has no reason to ask for a pay cut. He earned his contract...by being one of the best defensive players in the league for the past decade. The fact that he was hurt last year is irrelevant to the contract he signed before he arrived.

-There seems to be a prevaling gloom and doom feeling that he's about to have a Simeon Rice like drop-off and be a worthless scrub...or he could bounce back from injury at his age and have a strong season a la Michael Strahan.

-He had one of his best seasons ever, I think he even won defensive MVP, playing a lot of linebacker back in 2006.

-I don't know what the plan is for him and Andre Carter. Carter did have some success last year when they lined him up at LDE against the Vikings. Two things to consider though, a stalwart-Daniels-was lined up on the other side and the Vikings are not really a passing threat anyway. Either way, JT showed he can still play the game during the albeit limited time he was healthy. And, like I said before, he's one of the best defensive players to play the game in the last decade and he hasn't really had any injury problems until his one injury last year. It's up to Blache, Olivadotti, and Palermo to take advantage of his incredible talents and put him in the right positions to succeed.
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2009, 12:11 PM   #11
FRPLG
MVP
 
FRPLG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 10,164
Re: Taylor to Return w/o Restructure or Paycut

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
-He has no reason to ask for a pay cut. He earned his contract...by being one of the best defensive players in the league for the past decade. The fact that he was hurt last year is irrelevant to the contract he signed before he arrived.
There you go using blatant reasoning again! This line of thinking exists in exactly .73% of all sports fans. The rest are willing to let a guy play at all-pro level for less than he should be making but once he signs a fair deal and eventually his play drops then he is "stealing from the team". Hypocrisy at its best.

I agree with you. He earned his deal. It's on us for acquiring it. He was a great football player and maybe he still can be. One year at that salary won't kill us long term. Restructuring it to save a few mil and pushing it forward just kills us long term. In this case I'd prefer we take one year of greater risk rather than three of lesser, yet still substantial risk.
FRPLG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2009, 12:17 PM   #12
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,846
Re: Taylor to Return w/o Restructure or Paycut

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
I like that he's coming back for another season.

-It's not up to him to decide to restructure. The Redskins should go to Taylor and his agent if they want to restructure, not the other way around. And, I don't consider myself a cap expert, but I'm sure there are good reasons for not restructuring his deal where it potentially hurts us more in the long run.

-He has no reason to ask for a pay cut. He earned his contract...by being one of the best defensive players in the league for the past decade. The fact that he was hurt last year is irrelevant to the contract he signed before he arrived.

-There seems to be a prevaling gloom and doom feeling that he's about to have a Simeon Rice like drop-off and be a worthless scrub...or he could bounce back from injury at his age and have a strong season a la Michael Strahan.

-He had one of his best seasons ever, I think he even won defensive MVP, playing a lot of linebacker back in 2006.

-I don't know what the plan is for him and Andre Carter. Carter did have some success last year when they lined him up at LDE against the Vikings. Two things to consider though, a stalwart-Daniels-was lined up on the other side and the Vikings are not really a passing threat anyway. Either way, JT showed he can still play the game during the albeit limited time he was healthy. And, like I said before, he's one of the best defensive players to play the game in the last decade and he hasn't really had any injury problems until his one injury last year. It's up to Blache, Olivadotti, and Palermo to take advantage of his incredible talents and put him in the right positions to succeed.
Good points.

Personally I would like to have his cap space, but we should be able to free up an ample amount with other moves.

I never agreed with flat out cutting him. When healthy and used properly he's a game changer. I'm hoping we'll turn him loose and get creative in finding ways to let him get after the QB. He was clearly handcuffed last year and of course the injuries didn't help.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2009, 03:09 PM   #13
skinsfan69
Living Legend
 
skinsfan69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,453
Re: Taylor to Return w/o Restructure or Paycut

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
I like that he's coming back for another season.

-It's not up to him to decide to restructure. The Redskins should go to Taylor and his agent if they want to restructure, not the other way around. And, I don't consider myself a cap expert, but I'm sure there are good reasons for not restructuring his deal where it potentially hurts us more in the long run.

-He has no reason to ask for a pay cut. He earned his contract...by being one of the best defensive players in the league for the past decade. The fact that he was hurt last year is irrelevant to the contract he signed before he arrived.

-There seems to be a prevaling gloom and doom feeling that he's about to have a Simeon Rice like drop-off and be a worthless scrub...or he could bounce back from injury at his age and have a strong season a la Michael Strahan.

-He had one of his best seasons ever, I think he even won defensive MVP, playing a lot of linebacker back in 2006.

-I don't know what the plan is for him and Andre Carter. Carter did have some success last year when they lined him up at LDE against the Vikings. Two things to consider though, a stalwart-Daniels-was lined up on the other side and the Vikings are not really a passing threat anyway. Either way, JT showed he can still play the game during the albeit limited time he was healthy. And, like I said before, he's one of the best defensive players to play the game in the last decade and he hasn't really had any injury problems until his one injury last year. It's up to Blache, Olivadotti, and Palermo to take advantage of his incredible talents and put him in the right positions to succeed.
But even when JT wasn't hurt he played like crap. He couldn't get to the passer or play the run. All he did was bat down some passes. So why take the risk for a guy that's not going be here for the off season program and only going to be here for one more year? That makes no sense to me. I'd rather keep Evans and bring in a guy like Canty than keep Taylor.
skinsfan69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2009, 03:12 PM   #14
Ruhskins
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,378
Re: Taylor to Return w/o Restructure or Paycut

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsfan69 View Post
But even when JT wasn't hurt he played like crap. He couldn't get to the passer or play the run. All he did was bat down some passes. So why take the risk for a guy that's not going be here for the off season program and only going to be here for one more year? That makes no sense to me. I'd rather keep Evans and bring in a guy like Canty than keep Taylor.
I haven't heard anything about him not being here in the offseason? Have you? Also, none of our players could get to the passer all season.
__________________
R.I.P. #21
Ruhskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2009, 03:22 PM   #15
53Fan
Franchise Player
 
53Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kill Devil Hills, N.C.
Posts: 7,570
Re: Taylor to Return w/o Restructure or Paycut

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruhskins View Post
I haven't heard anything about him not being here in the offseason? Have you? Also, none of our players could get to the passer all season.
I thought that's why we paid big bucks and draft picks for JT.
__________________
Defense wins championships. Bring it!
53Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:25 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 1.37025 seconds with 11 queries