Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


2009 NFL Draft Chat/Discussion

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-26-2009, 04:31 PM   #1
skinsnut
Playmaker
 
skinsnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,975
Re: 2009 NFL Draft Chat/Discussion

I wish Kiper were our GM
__________________
I hate Dallas...Period
skinsnut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2009, 04:31 PM   #2
JoeRedskin
Contains football related knowledge
 
JoeRedskin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Second Star On The Right
Age: 62
Posts: 10,401
Re: 2009 NFL Draft Chat/Discussion

Yeah!!! An inside LB!!

We are carefully avoiding ANY offensive picks this year.

Wait... other than Orakpo, all our picks have been offensive.
__________________
Strap it up, hold onto the ball, and let’s go.
JoeRedskin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2009, 04:59 PM   #3
GusFrerotte
Registered User
 
GusFrerotte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Detroit area
Posts: 4,153
Re: 2009 NFL Draft Chat/Discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeRedskin View Post
Yeah!!! An inside LB!!

We are carefully avoiding ANY offensive picks this year.

Wait... other than Orakpo, all our picks have been offensive.

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!! Actually the LB picks were at least good for depth. Barnes could be starter caliber.
GusFrerotte is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2009, 05:10 PM   #4
JoeRedskin
Contains football related knowledge
 
JoeRedskin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Second Star On The Right
Age: 62
Posts: 10,401
Re: 2009 NFL Draft Chat/Discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by GusFrerotte View Post
Actually the LB picks were at least good for depth. Barnes could be starter caliber.
yeah. I know. I am just disappointed that, with a top 10 defense and one of the lowest scoring offenses in the league, we didnt take a few more shots on that side of the ball.

Think about it, other than Dockery, every significant offseason aquisition has been on the defensive side of the ball. Haynesworth, Hall, Orakpo, Barnes. Sure it had its issues late in the game, but was our defense THAT bad?!?!
__________________
Strap it up, hold onto the ball, and let’s go.
JoeRedskin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2009, 05:16 PM   #5
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
Re: 2009 NFL Draft Chat/Discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeRedskin View Post
yeah. I know. I am just disappointed that, with a top 10 defense and one of the lowest scoring offenses in the league, we didnt take a few more shots on that side of the ball.

Think about it, other than Dockery, every significant offseason aquisition has been on the defensive side of the ball. Haynesworth, Hall, Orakpo, Barnes. Sure it had its issues late in the game, but was our defense THAT bad?!?!
We lost a lot of parts and needed to use resources there.

I'm not all that disappointed that we didn't touch the OL as we aren't exactly oozing with roster space at that position, but I'm pretty shocked that we're not spending late round picks on a runner we like. I mean, it's a perfect use of a 5th or 6th rounder, and we're just poking around for linebackers who can't all make the team because, again, limited roster space.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2009, 10:10 PM   #6
tryfuhl
Gamebreaker
 
tryfuhl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Waldorf, MD
Age: 42
Posts: 12,514
Re: 2009 NFL Draft Chat/Discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
We lost a lot of parts and needed to use resources there.

I'm not all that disappointed that we didn't touch the OL as we aren't exactly oozing with roster space at that position, but I'm pretty shocked that we're not spending late round picks on a runner we like. I mean, it's a perfect use of a 5th or 6th rounder, and we're just poking around for linebackers who can't all make the team because, again, limited roster space.
What do you think of Sheets? He went undrafted right?
tryfuhl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2009, 05:17 PM   #7
Lotus
Fire Bruce NOW
 
Lotus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 11,434
Re: 2009 NFL Draft Chat/Discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeRedskin View Post
yeah. I know. I am just disappointed that, with a top 10 defense and one of the lowest scoring offenses in the league, we didnt take a few more shots on that side of the ball.

Think about it, other than Dockery, every significant offseason aquisition has been on the defensive side of the ball. Haynesworth, Hall, Orakpo, Barnes. Sure it had its issues late in the game, but was our defense THAT bad?!?!
I understand what you are saying. But I offer this: in the draft we simply weren't going to be able to fill all 3 holes at OT, DE, and LB. Filling two of those holes through the draft would be a good draft. If Orakpo is the real deal, we filled one hole. If one of those LB's turns out to be the next Horton, we filled two holes. And let's face it, by drafting 2 LB's we are increasing the chance that at least one of the LB's works out.

Over the course of the next few months, vet OT's should appear on the market. We could nab one of them and perhaps be in good shape. Or maybe Heyer, Rinehart, or Williams is quietly having a monster offseason and next year will be much, much better than before. All is not lost for the offense.
__________________
Bruce Allen when in charge alone: 4-12 (.250)
Bruce Allen's overall Redskins record : 28-52 (.350)
Vinny Cerrato's record when in charge alone: 52-65 (.444)
Vinny's overall Redskins record: 62-82 (.430)
We won more with Vinny
Lotus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2009, 05:38 PM   #8
Ruhskins
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,378
Re: 2009 NFL Draft Chat/Discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeRedskin View Post
yeah. I know. I am just disappointed that, with a top 10 defense and one of the lowest scoring offenses in the league, we didnt take a few more shots on that side of the ball.

Think about it, other than Dockery, every significant offseason aquisition has been on the defensive side of the ball. Haynesworth, Hall, Orakpo, Barnes. Sure it had its issues late in the game, but was our defense THAT bad?!?!
Well I guess added pressure for the offensive players taken in last year's draft (the WRs, Fred Davis, and Rineheart)
__________________
R.I.P. #21
Ruhskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2009, 05:47 PM   #9
Superman13732
Special Teams
 
Superman13732's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Binghamton NY
Posts: 163
Re: 2009 NFL Draft Chat/Discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruhskins View Post
Well I guess added pressure for the offensive players taken in last year's draft (the WRs, Fred Davis, and Rineheart)
I agree. There is a lot more pressure for these players to produce, we let them develop, and adjust to NFL game speed last year, as well as some time for the WRs to recover from their various injuries (other than Kelly's degenerative knee condition). But i think Dock and Williams (hopefully his back has recovered enough over the past few years), I like the way our line is shaping up, I think we could have used a couple of young bodies from the draft, but, Vinny almighty decided against it. But, the REAL key, is whether Jason Campbell can take more of a leadership role, increase his play recognition, and start making those throws down field. This will prevent defenses from stacking the box like we witnessed in the last half of last season starting with the Steelers.
Superman13732 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2009, 05:02 PM   #10
Dirtbag59
Naega jeil jal naga
 
Dirtbag59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 40
Posts: 14,750
Re: 2009 NFL Draft Chat/Discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeRedskin View Post
Yeah!!! An inside LB!!

We are carefully avoiding ANY offensive picks this year.

Wait... other than Orakpo, all our picks have been offensive.
Just be glad it's not a kicker.
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice."
- Scooter

"I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now."
- FRPLG
Dirtbag59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2009, 05:08 PM   #11
CRedskinsRule
Living Legend
 
CRedskinsRule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 58
Posts: 21,703
Re: 2009 NFL Draft Chat/Discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeRedskin View Post
Yeah!!! An inside LB!!

We are carefully avoiding ANY offensive picks this year.

Wait... other than Orakpo, all our picks have been offensive.
Our last two picks will be a punter and a WR
CRedskinsRule is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2009, 05:08 PM   #12
GusFrerotte
Registered User
 
GusFrerotte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Detroit area
Posts: 4,153
Re: 2009 NFL Draft Chat/Discussion

Other than not addressing the O line, the draft is all you could expect it would be. Outside of the first 2 rounds the talent really isn't there this year. The Jets really screwed up with Sanchez and we really did good by avoiding him. i still think we will look to trade up to take McCoy or Bradford in 2010.
GusFrerotte is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2009, 05:09 PM   #13
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
Re: 2009 NFL Draft Chat/Discussion

Feels like we're just sniffing around the ultra athletic LB type instead of being proactive.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2009, 05:15 PM   #14
tryfuhl
Gamebreaker
 
tryfuhl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Waldorf, MD
Age: 42
Posts: 12,514
Re: 2009 NFL Draft Chat/Discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
Feels like we're just sniffing around the ultra athletic LB type instead of being proactive.
a bit huh
tryfuhl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2009, 05:23 PM   #15
Superman13732
Special Teams
 
Superman13732's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Binghamton NY
Posts: 163
Re: 2009 NFL Draft Chat/Discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
Feels like we're just sniffing around the ultra athletic LB type instead of being proactive.
Except for the part where Cody Glenn plays LB now (for the last year) because he had too many leg injuries at RB (which he played for the three years prior, unproductively at that). "Ultra Athletic" That may have been where the FO heart was, but i think Vinny pulled a classic Vinny and just closed his eyes and pointed at a list of players.
Superman13732 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 2.09050 seconds with 10 queries