What Position Would You NOT Address This Off-Season

53Fan · 03-04-2009, 12:02 PM

Maybe I'm reading the question wrong but I'm taking it to mean one position would not be addressed in the draft OR free agency. Which means you can't say punter and then say we can get a punter later in free agency. One position would not be addressed at all. Am I reading this wrong?

KLHJ2 · 03-04-2009, 12:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 53Fan

Maybe I'm reading the question wrong but I'm taking it to mean one position would not be addressed in the draft OR free agency. Which means you can't say punter and then say we can get a punter later in free agency. One position would not be addressed at all. Am I reading this wrong?

Nope, others just don't know how to read and comprehend.

SmootSmack · 03-04-2009, 12:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 53Fan

Maybe I'm reading the question wrong but I'm taking it to mean one position would not be addressed in the draft OR free agency. Which means you can't say punter and then say we can get a punter later in free agency. One position would not be addressed at all. Am I reading this wrong?

You're reading it right. And when I say free agency, I'm talking about the market for free agents right now. I'm not talking about an undrafted free agent that doesn't get drafted, and I'm only talking about our first two picks. I realize that a 7th rounder started at Safety for us last year, and a 5th rounder at DT but let's assume we won't find a legit starter year one in either of those rounds.

SmootSmack · 03-04-2009, 12:04 PM

Pockets, do you agree with SFRedskins or not? I couldn't tell from your two posts.

I think we should sign Hunter today, been calling for him for a while. He wants to be here and we need a punter.

Pocket$ $traight · 03-04-2009, 12:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

Pockets, do you agree with SFRedskins or not? I couldn't tell from your two posts.

I think we should sign Hunter today, been calling for him for a while. He wants to be here and we need a punter.

My bad, I skimmed the first post too quickly. I disagree that we should try the "wait and see" approach to finding a punter.

I don't want the Cowboys (or anyone else's) second punter. I want Smith who is arguably the best punter in the league. I don't think it makes sense to spend $200 million and then try and find a punter on the cheap.

CRedskinsRule · 03-04-2009, 12:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

Pockets, do you agree with SFRedskins or not? I couldn't tell from your two posts.

I think we should sign Hunter today, been calling for him for a while. He wants to be here and we need a punter.

Smoot, any idea what the hold up is with signing Hunter?

SmootSmack · 03-04-2009, 01:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule

Smoot, any idea what the hold up is with signing Hunter?

I'm not sure how strong the interest truly is from the Skins' side

Rajmahal33 · 03-04-2009, 01:02 PM

I'm pretty sure someone would've probably already posted this but it's funny nonetheless
"Vinny's e-mail was hacked"
http://assets.sbnation.com/assets/78...ailCerrato.jpg

CRedskinsRule · 03-04-2009, 01:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

I'm not sure how strong the interest truly is from the Skins' side

Ya know, that's probably the most discouraging thing I have heard said about the FO. I am a big supporter of them in general, but if they went out and used a draft pick, and it was a bust, the next way to get one is to find one who is a known commodity. C'est la vie.

SmootSmack · 03-04-2009, 01:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule

Ya know, that's probably the most discouraging thing I have heard said about the FO. I am a big supporter of them in general, but if they went out and used a draft pick, and it was a bust, the next way to get one is to find one who is a known commodity. C'est la vie.

Not speaking on behalf of the Redskins here, but some of the concerns I've heard about Smith are his age and the fact that he's punted half his games in a dome each year throughout his career.

Paintrain · 03-04-2009, 02:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

Pockets, do you agree with SFRedskins or not? I couldn't tell from your two posts.

I think we should sign Hunter today, been calling for him for a while. He wants to be here and we need a punter.

Is that a prediction or a suggestion?

SmootSmack · 03-04-2009, 02:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paintrain

Is that a prediction or a suggestion?

suggestion

saden1 · 03-04-2009, 12:09 PM

I would have to go with DE seeing how we now have the best DT in league playing on the 4th best defense in the league.

Monkeydad · 03-04-2009, 01:17 PM

Of these choices, it has to be LB.

Funny how so many people picked punter when we don't have one now. Wasn't Plack cut?

I guess Randel El can start punting instead of being on the other end of the kicks.

roth74va · 03-04-2009, 01:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buster

Funny how so many people picked punter when we don't have one now. Wasn't Plack cut?

Zac Atterberry..........whoever he is, lol.

View Poll Results: What Position Would You NOT Address This Off-Season
Offensive Line	11	11.34%
Defensive End	24	24.74%
Punter	45	46.39%
Linebacker	17	17.53%
Voters: 97. You may not vote on this poll

03-04-2009, 12:02 PM	#1
53Fan Franchise Player Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Kill Devil Hills, N.C. Posts: 7,570	Re: What Position Would You NOT Address This Off-Season Maybe I'm reading the question wrong but I'm taking it to mean one position would not be addressed in the draft OR free agency. Which means you can't say punter and then say we can get a punter later in free agency. One position would not be addressed at all. Am I reading this wrong? __________________ Defense wins championships. Bring it!

03-04-2009, 12:04 PM	#4
SmootSmack Uncle Phil Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 45,256	Re: What Position Would You NOT Address This Off-Season Pockets, do you agree with SFRedskins or not? I couldn't tell from your two posts. I think we should sign Hunter today, been calling for him for a while. He wants to be here and we need a punter. __________________ You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You

03-04-2009, 01:02 PM	#8
Rajmahal33 Special Teams Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Silver Spring, MD Posts: 478	Re: What Position Would You NOT Address This Off-Season I'm pretty sure someone would've probably already posted this but it's funny nonetheless "Vinny's e-mail was hacked" http://assets.sbnation.com/assets/78...ailCerrato.jpg __________________ McNasty FTW!

03-04-2009, 12:09 PM	#13
saden1 MVP Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Seattle Age: 46 Posts: 10,069	Re: What Position Would You NOT Address This Off-Season I would have to go with DE seeing how we now have the best DT in league playing on the 4th best defense in the league. __________________ "The Redskins have always suffered from chronic organizational deformities under Snyder." -Jenkins

03-04-2009, 01:17 PM	#14
Monkeydad Living Legend Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: PA Age: 46 Posts: 17,460	Re: What Position Would You NOT Address This Off-Season Of these choices, it has to be LB. Funny how so many people picked punter when we don't have one now. Wasn't Plack cut? I guess Randel El can start punting instead of being on the other end of the kicks. __________________ Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster

What Position Would You NOT Address This Off-Season

Locker Room Main Forum