Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum


Just a question for the Redskins diehard faithful....

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-22-2013, 05:19 PM   #31
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
Re: Just a question for the Redskins diehard faithful....

Quote:
Originally Posted by HailGreen28 View Post
He and Kyle built a good offense. We just need RG3 healthy.
Is this really a good offense? -7.1% DVOA this year. Zorn's offenses posted an +8.2% in 2008 and -8.3% in 2009. Spurrier's offenses put up a -7.0% in 2002 and -6.7% in 2003.

This level of offense has gotten Snyder to change coaches before.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 12-22-2013, 05:24 PM   #32
The Goat
Pro Bowl
 
The Goat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
Re: Just a question for the Redskins diehard faithful....

Mike is a bad coach, period. His offense is inconsistent and defense and special teams horrible. He has no business as a pro coach. Neither does his jackass kiddo.
__________________
24-34
The Goat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2013, 05:44 PM   #33
HailGreen28
Playmaker
 
HailGreen28's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 3,754
Re: Just a question for the Redskins diehard faithful....

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
Is this really a good offense? -7.1% DVOA this year. Zorn's offenses posted an +8.2% in 2008 and -8.3% in 2009. Spurrier's offenses put up a -7.0% in 2002 and -6.7% in 2003.

This level of offense has gotten Snyder to change coaches before.
First off, DVOA is about as meaningful as ESPN's new Quarterback rating system. That being said, comparing one year to the next: 2012 DVOA when we had RG3 healthy for most of it: 16.1%

Stats I care about: 2012 offense was #5 in the NFL yds/G, #4 pts/G, and our rushing was #1 yds/G and #4 pts/G.

Tell me with RG3 healthy we aren't an offensive juggernaut.
HailGreen28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2013, 05:52 PM   #34
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 51
Posts: 99,427
Re: Just a question for the Redskins diehard faithful....

Serious question for anyone who thinks Mike deserves another year.

WTF is wrong with you?
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2013, 05:53 PM   #35
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
Re: Just a question for the Redskins diehard faithful....

Quote:
Originally Posted by HailGreen28 View Post
First off, DVOA is about as meaningful as ESPN's new Quarterback rating system. That being said, comparing one year to the next: 2012 DVOA when we had RG3 healthy for most of it: 16.1%

Stats I care about: 2012 offense was #5 in the NFL yds/G, #4 pts/G, and our rushing was #1 yds/G and #4 pts/G.

Tell me with RG3 healthy we aren't an offensive juggernaut.
With RG3 healthy we are not an offensive juggernaut.

I think if you can make a really good case in favor of this rushing offense being as strong as any, but the passing game was an adventure every one of the last four years. Even last year, I thought the passing game was sloppy and unproductive at 3-6. That changed on the seven game winning streak when they put in some spread plays that Griffin ran at Baylor, but they haven't used that part of the playbook this year, and we can't execute anything else.

The bigger point is that THIS LEVEL OF OFFENSE GETS PEOPLE FIRED. So whether or not the team is likely to rebound with an influx of talent and a more confident RG3 is irrelevant. Coaches know you can't let it sink to this level and keep your job. The Cousins play was the last bullet in the barrel. Shanahan is defenseless.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.

Last edited by GTripp0012; 12-22-2013 at 05:59 PM.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2013, 05:54 PM   #36
diehardskin2982
Another Year, another mess.
 
diehardskin2982's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,581
Re: Just a question for the Redskins diehard faithful....

I wonder if this Redskins experience has hurt his chances to Join the Hall of Fame?
__________________
That got ugly fast
diehardskin2982 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2013, 05:56 PM   #37
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
Re: Just a question for the Redskins diehard faithful....

Quote:
Originally Posted by diehardskin2982 View Post
I wonder if this Redskins experience has hurt his chances to Join the Hall of Fame?
Hurt? Yes of course. Will it prevent him from getting in? It probably should, but the HOF process is highly politicized, and this is only going to hurt him if he gets on the wrong side of too many of the voters. Losing two votes for the Washington area voters is likely not the difference.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2013, 06:00 PM   #38
budw38
Playmaker
 
budw38's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Northern,Va.
Posts: 2,706
Re: Just a question for the Redskins diehard faithful....

Steve Spurrier won 7 games with , Ramsey (R) , Mathews and Wuerffel as our qb's . MS has had 4 years , and this is the worst team I think I have ever seen in Washington . Sorry Mike .... you must go .
budw38 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2013, 06:14 PM   #39
skinsfaninok
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
skinsfaninok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UNITED STATES
Age: 37
Posts: 35,999
Quote:
Originally Posted by budw38 View Post
Steve Spurrier won 7 games with , Ramsey (R) , Mathews and Wuerffel as our qb's . MS has had 4 years , and this is the worst team I think I have ever seen in Washington . Sorry Mike .... you must go .
It's not a think it is , this is worse than zorn
__________________
“Mediocre people don’t like high achievers, and high achievers don’t like mediocre people.”
― Nick Saban
skinsfaninok is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2013, 06:17 PM   #40
EARTHQUAKE2689
You did WHAT?!?
 
EARTHQUAKE2689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: In The Kitchen With Dyna.
Age: 35
Posts: 14,143
Re: Just a question for the Redskins diehard faithful....

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
Serious question for anyone who thinks Mike deserves another year.

WTF is wrong with you?
brain aneurysm??
__________________
https://open.spotify.com/artist/1NG9zNxqMP8cYNP72QqUQT

Shameless self-promotion. It is what it is.
EARTHQUAKE2689 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2013, 06:41 PM   #41
HailGreen28
Playmaker
 
HailGreen28's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 3,754
Re: Just a question for the Redskins diehard faithful....

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
With RG3 healthy we are not an offensive juggernaut.

I think if you can make a really good case in favor of this rushing offense being as strong as any, but the passing game was an adventure every one of the last four years. Even last year, I thought the passing game was sloppy and unproductive at 3-6. That changed on the seven game winning streak when they put in some spread plays that Griffin ran at Baylor, but they haven't used that part of the playbook this year, and we can't execute anything else.

The bigger point is that THIS LEVEL OF OFFENSE GETS PEOPLE FIRED. So whether or not the team is likely to rebound with an influx of talent and a more confident RG3 is irrelevant. Coaches know you can't let it sink to this level and keep your job. The Cousins play was the last bullet in the barrel. Shanahan is defenseless.
I'm not sure whether to agree with you about whether we ran the spread offense more late last season. But our offense was a juggernaut last season. To argue otherwise is historical revisionism. We went on a great run, and were kicking Seattle's *** until RG3 got hurt right before our second TD.

I know Shanny's overall record doesn't justify a 5th year here. I know our D and ST are ****. But now you're saying the offense is no good and others are talking about Shanny's "relationship" with RG3 as a factor in this situation?

This is classic Redskins under Snyder's ownership. Historical revisionism and blame-gaming.

Sure, let's fire another coach early, and be a circus here about "how it really went down".

No wonder we're a ****ing laughingstock.
HailGreen28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2013, 06:49 PM   #42
Bigreds77
Special Teams
 
Bigreds77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 214
Re: Just a question for the Redskins diehard faithful....

I would love to see a Redskin guy take over but nobody would want Russ Grimm because everyone thinks a big name coach is the answer. It looks to me the big name coaches are like the big name players they come to DC to retire.
Bigreds77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2013, 06:51 PM   #43
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
Re: Just a question for the Redskins diehard faithful....

Quote:
Originally Posted by HailGreen28 View Post
I'm not sure whether to agree with you about whether we ran the spread offense more late last season. But our offense was a juggernaut last season. To argue otherwise is historical revisionism. We went on a great run, and were kicking Seattle's *** until RG3 got hurt right before our second TD.

I know Shanny's overall record doesn't justify a 5th year here. I know our D and ST are ****. But now you're saying the offense is no good and others are talking about Shanny's "relationship" with RG3 as a factor in this situation?

This is classic Redskins under Snyder's ownership. Historical revisionism and blame-gaming.

Sure, let's fire another coach early, and be a circus here about "how it really went down".

No wonder we're a ****ing laughingstock.
Okay, so "revisionism" is pointing to 2012 and building an argument about how good our offense was in a sample less than half the length of which we have struggled in this year. Taking four years as a whole and pointing out that the passing game has not been good throughout many different factors is not revisionism, it is analysis. They have been worse then their average this year.

In short, we have been bad at throwing the football since the Shanahan's got here. We have been worse more recently.

With their successes last year, Mike, Kyle, Jim et al earned the right to have 2013 be the deciding year on their tenure here. That's what they earned by winning the NFC East in 2012. We're at the end of 2013 now and, well, you have to wait a week for the verdict to be read, but no one thinks it's in doubt.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2013, 07:15 PM   #44
skinsfan69
Living Legend
 
skinsfan69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,143
Re: Just a question for the Redskins diehard faithful....

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
Serious question for anyone who thinks Mike deserves another year.

WTF is wrong with you?
Regardless of what all the fans think, many of the respected vets have lobbied for MS. Even Cooley has said very positive things about MS.
skinsfan69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2013, 07:20 PM   #45
HailGreen28
Playmaker
 
HailGreen28's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 3,754
Re: Just a question for the Redskins diehard faithful....

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
Okay, so "revisionism" is pointing to 2012 and building an argument about how good our offense was in a sample less than half the length of which we have struggled in this year. Taking four years as a whole and pointing out that the passing game has not been good throughout many different factors is not revisionism, it is analysis. They have been worse then their average this year.
And the past six years the Redskins offense has been bad. So what does that change about the Shanny's offense clicking with a healthy RG3?

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
In short, we have been bad at throwing the football since the Shanahan's got here. We have been worse more recently.
Your franchise QB playing on one leg tends to do that.

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
With their successes last year, Mike, Kyle, Jim et al earned the right to have 2013 be the deciding year on their tenure here. That's what they earned by winning the NFC East in 2012. We're at the end of 2013 now and, well, you have to wait a week for the verdict to be read, but no one thinks it's in doubt.
I was unaware year 4 was the deciding year per Mike Shanahan's contract.

I agree Shanny's tenure here has been pretty bad. I think he's done the best he could here. And looking at past coaches, seems par for the course. Turner - fired middle of a disappointing season, one year after making the playoffs. Schotty - fired in one season even after the team rallied for him. Spurrier - quit after only two seasons, doing fine in SC now. Gibbs - made playoffs twice, but even he couldn't make a +.500 tenure here. Zorn - .

Sure, let the circus continue. Think the best up and coming Head Coaches will be beating down Snyder's door at this rate?

Would love for Shanny, Snyder, and RG3 to go to the next photo op, and collectively flip the bird to the press. And Shanny and Co. have the team make the playoffs next season. But I guess my fantasy just isn't happening. It's just business as usual: Blaming and historical revisionism and a revolving door at the Head Coach office. Wonderful.
HailGreen28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.15580 seconds with 10 queries