Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum


Scud's Studs (12th off the bench): Cards vs. Skins

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-18-2011, 09:34 PM   #31
doughtydoubter
Impact Rookie
 
doughtydoubter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: the glorious city of DC
Posts: 740
Re: Scud's Studs (12th off the bench): Cards vs. Skins

i gotta go with shanny on thi sone...i think it was a pretty well coached game..
doughtydoubter is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 09-18-2011, 09:41 PM   #32
Bucket
Playmaker
 
Bucket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Martinsburg, WV
Posts: 3,881
Re: Scud's Studs (12th off the bench): Cards vs. Skins

Why would you trade Cooley? We run A LOT of two TE sets now.. Why not have both and create double mismatches in 2wr/2te sets?
__________________
I need something to cheer about
Redskin Fan since '88
Be friends on Twitter! @thecasualhero
Bucket is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2011, 09:43 PM   #33
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 51
Posts: 99,430
Re: Scud's Studs (12th off the bench): Cards vs. Skins

CC isn't going anywhere. No sense in even discussing it.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2011, 09:44 PM   #34
12thMan
MVP
 
12thMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,460
Re: Scud's Studs (12th off the bench): Cards vs. Skins

Quote:
Originally Posted by doughtydoubter View Post
i gotta go with shanny on thi sone...i think it was a pretty well coached game..
You really can't say this enough. The team didn't get rattled when they fell behind, they didn't lose focus and commit costly penalties in the red zone like they did last year. And Shanny and Kyle used Helu brilliantly.

I have to say Has and his staff was throwing some stuff at Kolb. After Fitz 7 catches, the next leading receiver had 2 receptions. Not bad.
12thMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2011, 09:45 PM   #35
12thMan
MVP
 
12thMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,460
Re: Scud's Studs (12th off the bench): Cards vs. Skins

I don't understand the mentality that says we need a Pro-Bowler at every position. If this year's draft is any indication, we'll be picking up more studs next year.

Get it...studs.
12thMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2011, 09:47 PM   #36
mooby
Hug Anne Spyder
 
mooby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,356
Re: Scud's Studs (12th off the bench): Cards vs. Skins

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bucket View Post
Why would you trade Cooley? We run A LOT of two TE sets now.. Why not have both and create double mismatches in 2wr/2te sets?
Right! Why should we create on-field advantages? What have those ever done for us?
__________________
Hail to the Football Team
mooby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2011, 10:22 PM   #37
VegasSkinsFan
Impact Rookie
 
VegasSkinsFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 551
Re: Scud's Studs (12th off the bench): Cards vs. Skins

Quote:
Originally Posted by mooby View Post
As much as I love Cooley, I'd have to be seriously high to think a team would offer a Pro Bowl caliber guard that fits Shanny's scheme for him, even if he was fully healthy.
I won't pretend I can evaluate talent well enough to determine which players fit Shanny's scheme. That said while I don't see us getting a guy without risks, I could easily see us getting a guy with baggage similar to what cooley has a boarder line pro bowl player with injury problems that could still produce in the right situation. A guy similar to Davin Joseph. Not saying we would get him exactly, but I could see Cooley returning some value. Especially to a team that is looking to horde some cash as cooley would drive some merchandise sales.
VegasSkinsFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2011, 10:23 PM   #38
rbanerjee23
The Starter
 
rbanerjee23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,440
Re: Scud's Studs (12th off the bench): Cards vs. Skins

Fred Davis has had two really good games -- that doesn't mean we are ready to get rid of Cooley, guy has a manageable salary and is a threat at the TE position. We have so little depth at so many positions, why would be reduce it?
__________________
"Tough times don't last but tough people do"

-Mike Shanahan

HTTR
rbanerjee23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2011, 10:26 PM   #39
mooby
Hug Anne Spyder
 
mooby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,356
Re: Scud's Studs (12th off the bench): Cards vs. Skins

Quote:
Originally Posted by rbanerjee23 View Post
Fred Davis has had two really good games -- that doesn't mean we are ready to get rid of Cooley, guy has a manageable salary and is a threat at the TE position. We have so little depth at so many positions, why would be reduce it?
Not trying to disagree with your point here, because I agree with it, but these first two games haven't been the first time Davis has stepped up when given the opportunity. He filled in fine for Cooley when Cooley had the injury problems in 2009. I think right now he's showing that he's ready to step up and play a big time role for us, and Cooley is definitely no slouch when healthy either. I hope we have the both of them for at least a couple more years, although I do agree Davis is showing he's worthy of being our #1 at this point.
__________________
Hail to the Football Team
mooby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2011, 10:28 PM   #40
VegasSkinsFan
Impact Rookie
 
VegasSkinsFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 551
Re: Scud's Studs (12th off the bench): Cards vs. Skins

Quote:
Originally Posted by rbanerjee23 View Post
Fred Davis has had two really good games -- that doesn't mean we are ready to get rid of Cooley, guy has a manageable salary and is a threat at the TE position. We have so little depth at so many positions, why would be reduce it?
I don't think anyone is talking about doing an inseason trade. If we could swing something in the offseason while also grabbing another TE to develop in the draft we would have to consider it.
VegasSkinsFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2011, 12:21 AM   #41
SFREDSKIN
Living Legend
 
SFREDSKIN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Pacifica, CA
Posts: 15,164
Re: Scud's Studs (12th off the bench): Cards vs. Skins

Let's not forget:

Moss
Rocca
Gano
Westbrook
__________________
Joe Gibbs- The best coach of all time, Lombardi trophy should be renamed Gibbs.

Art Monk- Art was like an OL playing WR, doing the dirty work and not getting the glory.

Darrell Green- Best DB ever.


Purveyor of fine Filth
SFREDSKIN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2011, 12:23 AM   #42
SFREDSKIN
Living Legend
 
SFREDSKIN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Pacifica, CA
Posts: 15,164
Re: Scud's Studs (12th off the bench): Cards vs. Skins

Now why would the Redskins get rid of Cooley? Look at what NE is doing with 2 TE sets.
__________________
Joe Gibbs- The best coach of all time, Lombardi trophy should be renamed Gibbs.

Art Monk- Art was like an OL playing WR, doing the dirty work and not getting the glory.

Darrell Green- Best DB ever.


Purveyor of fine Filth
SFREDSKIN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2011, 12:26 AM   #43
Ruhskins
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,221
Re: Scud's Studs (12th off the bench): Cards vs. Skins

I would throw Orakpo's name in here. The guy has been a machine, and along with Kerrigan , makes a QB-killing duo out there. I think (and hope) that our pass rush is going to have a field day with a banged up Romo.
__________________
R.I.P. #21
Ruhskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2011, 12:35 AM   #44
Ruhskins
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,221
Re: Scud's Studs (12th off the bench): Cards vs. Skins

Quote:
Originally Posted by SFREDSKIN View Post
Now why would the Redskins get rid of Cooley? Look at what NE is doing with 2 TE sets.
New England is stupid, they need to trade one of their TEs!!! [/sarcasm]
__________________
R.I.P. #21
Ruhskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2011, 12:38 AM   #45
Dirtbag59
Naega jeil jal naga
 
Dirtbag59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 38
Posts: 14,750
Re: Scud's Studs (12th off the bench): Cards vs. Skins

Not that I advocate trading Cooley but most of our pass catchers are possession first guys. Armstrong is the only real deep threat thats regularly on the field. Moss these days is more quick and smart then he is fast. Kind of wish they would give Austin more playing time just to stretch the field a bit.
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice."
- Scooter

"I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now."
- FRPLG
Dirtbag59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.12460 seconds with 10 queries